Reformer Pilates vs Conventional Physiotherapy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two different rehabilitation methods for people with lumbar disc herniation: Reformer Pilates and Conventional Physiotherapy. Lumbar disc herniation can cause significant back pain and discomfort, impacting daily activities and quality of life. By determining which method is more effective in managing pain and other symptoms like fatigue and anxiety, the study seeks to improve treatment approaches for those suffering from this condition, ultimately enhancing their overall well-being. Participants in the study followed a rehabilitation program for six weeks. Those in the Reformer Pilates group attended 12 Pilates sessions, each lasting 45-50 minutes, twice a week. Meanwhile, the Conventional Physiotherapy group completed 30 sessions, five days a week, with each session also lasting 45-50 minutes. The study measured outcomes using various questionnaires to assess pain, fatigue, sleep quality, anxiety, fear of movement, and overall quality of life, both before and after the treatment. Results showed that Reformer Pilates was particularly effective for reducing pain, while Conventional Physiotherapy excelled in managing fatigue. Both methods proved beneficial for addressing fear of movement and fatigue, indicating the importance of choosing the right therapy based on individual patient needs.