Recruiting

Direct HIS/LBB Pacing vs. Conventional CRT in Symptomatic Heart Failure Patients with LBBB

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
Study Aim

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Direct HIS/LBB Pacing and conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in symptomatic heart failure patients with Left Bundle Branch Block, by evaluating the change in Left ventricular end-systolic volume after 6 months and the success rate of implanting a HIS-bundle or LBB lead.

What is being tested

HIS/LBB pacing

+ LV pacing

Device
Who is being recruted

Cardiac Conduction System Disease+6

+ Arrhythmias, Cardiac

+ Bundle-Branch Block

Over 18 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Interventional
Study Start: December 2023
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Study ContactDaniel Keene, MBChBMore contacts
Last updated: January 28, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Study start date: December 1, 2023

Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This study focuses on heart failure patients who have a condition called Left Bundle Branch Block, despite receiving the best medical treatments. These patients usually receive a type of treatment called biventricular pacing, but it has some drawbacks. The study is exploring a new approach called Direct HIS/Left Bundle Branch (LBB) pacing, which could potentially provide better results. The goal is to see if this new method can improve heart function and overcome the challenges of the current treatment, possibly offering a new solution for heart failure patients with this specific condition. In this single-center study, 125 patients are randomly assigned to either the conventional treatment (CRT) group or the new Direct HIS/LBB pacing group. For those in the new treatment group, Direct HIS-pacing is tried first. If it's not possible or the pacing threshold is too high, a Left Bundle Branch lead is used instead. The study measures the success of the treatment by looking at the decrease in left ventricular systolic volume after 6 months, and the success rate of implanting a pacing lead. The study also ensures that the new treatment is not worse than the current one by more than 10%.

Official TitleDirect HIS/LBB Pacing as an Alternative to Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure Despite Optimal Medical Treatment and ECG With Typical Left Bundle Branch Block
NCT05814263
Principal SponsorImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Study ContactDaniel Keene, MBChBMore contacts
Last updated: January 28, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details

40 patients to be enrolled

Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.

Treatment Study

These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.



Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria

Any sex

Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.

Over 18 Years

Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.

Healthy volunteers not allowed

If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.

Conditions

Pathology

Cardiac Conduction System DiseaseArrhythmias, CardiacBundle-Branch BlockCardiovascular DiseasesHeart BlockHeart DiseasesHeart FailurePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients over 18 years of age, ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤ 35% assessed by echocardiography, NYHA class II-IV heart failure symptoms despite optimal medical treatment and * Either planned new implantation of a biventricular pacing system (CRT-P or CRT-D), where the ECG is with sinus rhythm and a typical left bundle branch block (see definition below) * Or planned upgrade of an existing pacemaker or ICD to a biventricular pacing system (CRT-P or CRT-D), where the ECG is with sinus rhythm and a typical left bundle branch block or there has been\> 90% right ventricular pacing from an existing pacemaker for at least 2 months prior to enrollment * Signed informed consent * Typical left bundle branch block: * QRS width \> 130 msec for women and \> 140 msec for men QS or rS pattern in leads V1 and V2, and mid-QRS plateau phase with or without extras in at least 2 of leads V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL Exclusion Criteria: * Existing biventricular pacing system * Permanent atrial fibrillation * Severe renal failure with eGFR \< 30 ml/min * AMI or CABG within the last three months * The patient does not want to participate

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives

2 intervention groups are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups

Group I

Experimental
In this arm a right ventricular (RV) lead or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead is placed first and then implantation of a HIS-pacing lead is attempted. If it is not possible to find and pace HIS, to correct the LBBB or the threshold for correcting the LBBB is \> 2.5 V at 1 ms, implantation of a LBB-pacing lead is attempted instead. If that is not possible either, a left ventricular (LV) lead is implanted. Intervention: Device: HIS/LBB pacing

Group II

Active Comparator
In this arm an RV-lead or ICD-lead is placed first and then implantation of a LV-pacing lead is attempted. If this is not possible due to anatomical difficulties (no coronary sinus (CS) access, no available branches other than v cordis anterior or v cordis media) or electrical difficulties (no capture below 4 V at 1.0 msec or phrenic nerve stimulation \< 2x pacing threshold), implantation of a HIS-pacing lead is attempted instead. If that is not possible or the threshold for correcting the LBBB is \> 2.5 V at 1 ms, implantation of a LBB-pacing lead is attempted instead. Intervention: Device: LV pacing

Study Objectives

Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.

This study has 1 location

Recruiting

Hammersmith Hospital

London, United KingdomOpen Hammersmith Hospital in Google Maps
Recruiting
One Study Center