Completed

Standard vs Long IV Catheter Long-Term IV Survival Comparison

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Standard Long IV 4.78 cm 20 g catheter

+ Ultra-Long IV 6.35 cm 20 g catheter

Device
Who is being recruted

Over 18 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Interventional
Study Start: October 2018
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorCorewell Health East
Last updated: January 28, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Study start date: October 29, 2018

Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Patients with poor intravenous (IV) access present a daily challenge to emergency department (ED) practitioners. Placement of an ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral IV catheter in this patient population is a viable and safe option. Ultrasound-guided IVs are often the last recourse for IV access before resorting to more invasive procedures in patients with difficult access. Successful cannulation with US-guided IV occurs in more than 90% of cases compared with 25-35% with traditional IV placement in patients with difficult vascular access. Once cannulated, however, the failure rate of IV catheters placed under ultrasound guidance is concerning compared with traditional blind IV placement. Overall failure rates after successful IV cannulation for US-guided IVs is 45-56% when compared to traditional IV placement which is 19-25%. Because failure rate is high, it is important to approach insertions methodically to improve survival rates. A variable that may alter the survival of US-guided IVs that has not been studied is the length of catheter that resides in the vein. Currently the general accepted rule is that an "adequate" amount of the catheter should be in the vein to avoid failure of the catheter. Our preliminary data focused on defining this relationship. In our study, 100% of catheters failed in which less than 30% of the catheter was placed within the vein and no failures in those IVs in which at least 65% of the catheter was in the vein. This study was performed by the PI at Beaumont this past year and is published in Emergency Medicine Journal. This study is a prospective randomized controlled study of catheter longevity comparing a 4.78 cm (1.88 in) catheter to a longer 6.35 cm (2.5 in) catheter. Subjects will consist of a convenience sample of patients with difficult IV access presenting to the Beaumont Hospitals emergency department that require US-guided IV access. Standard of care is defined as use of a readily available 1.88 inch IV catheter that is used daily by emergency department personnel. Following consent, patients will be randomized to the control arm using the standard 4.78 cm catheter, or the experimental arm using a 6.35 cm catheter. All catheters are 20 gauge in diameter. After patient enrollment, the insertion tech, nurse or physician who has been credentialed in ultrasound-guided vascular access will place catheters in study subjects. Staff are expected to attempt a minimum of 3 attempts before enlisting another provider for help. After initial assessment, follow-up functionality of the catheter will be assessed every 24 hours by the research team as long as the patient is hospitalized, up to 30 days. Function of the catheter will be assessed daily by research staff. Function is defined by a catheter's ability to draw back 5 ml of blood, flush with 5 ml normal saline without resistance, or if IV fluids or medication are continually infusing through the IV. Other data variables collected include: patient pertinent medical history, vitals, age, sex, cannulation success or failure, vein diameter, length of catheter in vein as well as % length of the catheter in the vein, angle of insertion, number of venous access attempts, time to IV insertion (tourniquet to tegaderm), location of IV insertion, medications infused or use for ionic contrast injection for computed tomography.

Official TitleStandard vs Long IV Catheter Long-Term IV Survival Comparison
NCT03655106
Principal SponsorCorewell Health East
Last updated: January 28, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details

270 patients to be enrolled

Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.

Treatment Study

These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.



Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Criteria

Any sex

Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.

Over 18 Years

Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.

Healthy volunteers not allowed

If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years or older Self-reported difficult IV Access Patient and any one of the following: * Greater than 2 sticks in previous admission/hospital encounter * History of rescue vascular access device (such as US-guided IV, PICC line, midline, or CVC) * End-stage renal disease on dialysis * History of IV Drug Use * History of Sickle Cell Disease Exclusion Criteria: Age under 18 years old * Voluntary withdrawal or refusal to participate * Previous enrollment into the study

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives

2 intervention groups are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups

Group I

Active Comparator
Placement of Standard Long IV 4.78 cm 20 g catheter

Group II

Experimental
Placement of Ultra-Long length IV 6.35 cm 20 g catheter

Study Objectives

Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.

This study has 1 location

Suspended

Beaumont Hospitals

Royal Oak, United StatesOpen Beaumont Hospitals in Google Maps
CompletedOne Study Center