Completed

Comparison of Aurora Lancing Device and Commercially Available Devices for Blood Glucose Testing

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
Study Aim

This observational study aims to compare the Aurora lancing device with commercially available devices for blood glucose testing, focusing on the blood glucose reading and the associated pain levels when used on different body parts such as the palm and forearm.

What is being collected

Data Collection

Collected at a single point in time - Cross-sectional
Who is being recruted

Autoimmune Diseases+6

+ Diabetes Mellitus

+ Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Over 18 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Case-Control

Comparing exposures between individuals with and without disease in order to identify potential risk factors.
Observational
Study Start: August 2009
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorFacet Technologies
Last updated: January 27, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Study start date: August 1, 2009

Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

A low-pain lancing is being developed code name Aurora) for use with a 33g proprietary lancet (code name Velvet). This study evaluates the pain associated with finger lancing using this device and compares that pain to other commercially available lancing devices and associated lancets. All lancets used in the study are currently commercially available except the Facet 33g lancet, which is a prototype version of commercially available lancets. The Roche Multiclix, Roche Softclix, One Touch Comfort and Bayer Microlet 2 lancing devices are all commercially available. The Aurora Lancing Device is effective in obtaining a sufficient blood sample for performing an accurate blood glucose measurement; and the benefits of using the Aurora Lancing Device outweighs any residual risks associated with the product. Literature concerning blood glucose testing was researched by using popular medical databases such as pubmed.gov, diabeteshealth.com, clinicaltrial.gov and search terms lancing device, clinical study, blood volume and pain. Using other popular search engines such as Google was beneficial in helping to support claims concerning safety and efficacy. A commercial database company, NERAC was used as a part of the literature research effort. Our review, together with preliminary in-house bench testing, shows that the Aurora Lancing Device should be able to: * Obtain enough blood volume for a meter reading that measures blood glucose levels; * Is as safe as comparative lancing devices currently on the market; * Produces no more pain than comparative lancing devices currently on the market using a 28 gauge needle; and * Is representative of "current state of the art" The Aurora Lancing Device uses a 33 gauge, uniquely designed lancet developed under project Velvet. The blood lancet is designed so that it can only be used in the Aurora lancing device. The lancing device features multiple depth settings and includes alternate site test capability. The lancet guidance system is designed to maximize lancet control thereby increasing comfort and reducing pain perception. The Aurora lancing device is comparable to the Roche Softclix and other lancing devices already in commercial distribution. Like Aurora the Roche Softclix lancing device offers diabetics a unique lancet design and precise lancet motion. Roche Softclix uses a 28 gauge lancet and has eleven depth settings as well as alternative site test capability.

Official TitleLancing Device Comparison Study
NCT01740778
Principal SponsorFacet Technologies
Last updated: January 27, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details

200 patients to be enrolled

Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.

Case-Control

These studies compare people who have a disease (cases) with those who don't (controls). The goal is to look back at previous exposures or risk factors to identify what might have contributed to the disease.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria

Any sex

Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.

Over 18 Years

Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.

Healthy volunteers not allowed

If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.

Conditions

Pathology

Autoimmune DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Endocrine System DiseasesImmune System DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesGlucose Metabolism Disorders

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Must have been diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes for at least 1 year Must be doing SMBG, at least twice daily for at least 6 months Must be 18 years of age and older Must have healthy fingers and hands Must be able to read instructions in English. Must be able to perform all tasks in the protocol. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects with neuropathy or any other nerve damage in the hand or fingers (this will be discovered through the monofilament test) Subjects who are taking prescription anti-coagulants or more than one full aspirin per day during the past week or have clotting problems that may prolong bleeding (persons taking Plavix or a daily low dose aspirin will not be excluded but this will be recorded). Subjects taking prescription medications for neuropathy. Subjects with hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder. subjects with infection with a blood borne pathogen (e.g., HIV, hepatitis). Subjects having a condition such as a cognitive disorder, which in the opinion of the Investigator would put the person at risk or seriously compromise the integrity of the study (PI will sign CRF if subject is excluded). Subjects with missing digits. Subjects who are pregnant or nursing. Subjects on chemotherapy.

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Study Objectives

Study Objectives

Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has no location dataSave this study to your profile to know when the location data is available.
CompletedNo study centers