Completed

Safety and Efficacy of Thymosin Beta 4 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Dry Eye

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Thymosin beta 4

+ Placebo
Drug
Who is being recruted

Dry Eye Syndrome

+ Dry Eye
From 18 to 85 Years
+16 Eligibility Criteria

See all eligibility criteria

How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Placebo-Controlled
Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: August 2011

See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorReGenTree, LLC
Last updated: July 10, 2015
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: August 1, 2011Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Thymosin Beta 4 (Tβ4) is a synthetic copy of the naturally-occurring 43-amino acid peptide that is found in a variety of tissues. Tβ4 promotes/accelerates wound repair in dermal, ocular, and cardiac animal models. Two recent pre-clinical evaluations have demonstrated that Tβ4 promotes corneal ocular surface defects healing in animal models of dry eye. RGN-259 (formulation of Tβ4 ophthalmic solution) mechanism of action offers potential to be a product that meets a major unmet medical need in patients with dry eye. Tβ4 promotes wound repair and regeneration in various tissues. In the eye, it promotes corneal epithelial cell migration, decreases inflammation and has anti-apoptotic activities. It up-regulates the gene expression of laminin-5, a major subepithelial adhesion protein, located in the basement membrane region of the cornea, conjunctiva, and important in wound healing. In compassionate-use cases, Tβ4 has demonstrated efficacy in repairing non-healing neurotrophic corneal ulcers and other corneal epithelial wounds. In twenty-four nonclinical toxicology and safety pharmacology studies, the safety of Tβ4 has been demonstrated for its current and planned uses in man. The results of the two recent dry eye murine mouse model studies show that Tβ4 reduced corneal staining more than positive controls and demonstrated statistically significant reduction in staining compared to vehicle control. The results of these studies, in addition to data from compassionate use studies in patients with non-healing corneal surface defects, suggests that Tβ4 has a significant potential to be an important new safe and effective therapeutic in the treatment of dry eye syndrome.

Official TitleA Double-Masked, Randomized, Single-Center Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of 0.1% Tβ4 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Vehicle on the Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye in the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) Model 
Principal SponsorReGenTree, LLC
Last updated: July 10, 2015
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
72 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.
None (Single-arm trial): If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment: Everyone gets the same treatment.
Cross-over assignment: Participants switch between treatments during the study.
Factorial assignment: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.
Sequential assignment: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.
Other assignment: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a placebo-controlled study, some participants receive the experimental treatment, while others receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. This method helps to isolate the effect of the treatment from the psychological effects of receiving any treatment at all.

Other Options
Non-placebo-controlled: No placebo is used. All participants receive the actual treatment or alternative interventions (often the Standard of Care), and comparisons are made between these treatments.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers do not know which treatment is being given. This is the most complete way to prevent bias and keep the study as neutral as possible.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.
Single-blind: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.
Double-blind: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.
Triple-blind: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 85 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Dry Eye Syndrome
Dry Eye
Criteria
7 inclusion criteria required to participate
Have given a written, informed consent
Be able and willing to follow instructions, including participation in study assessments, and be present for the required study visits for the duration of the study
Have a best corrected visual acuity
Have a patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes

Show More Criteria

9 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
Have contraindications to the use of the study drug
Have known allergy or sensitivity to the study drug or components thereof
Have anterior blepharitis
Be diagnosed with an on-going ocular infection or active ocular inflammation

Show More Criteria

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
2 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

50% chance 

of being blinded to the placebo group

Treatment Groups
Group I
Active Comparator
RGN-259 is a preservative-free, sterile eye drop solution containing 0.1% (w/w) Tβ4
Group II
Placebo
The placebo solution is composed of the same excipients as RGN-259 but does not contain Tβ4. The Placebo is identical to the RGN-259 eye drops in color, consistency, and odor.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

This is a test that uses orange dye (fluorescein) and a blue light to detect ocular surface defects associated with dry eye. If the test result is normal, the dye remains in the tear film on the surface of the eye and does not adhere to the eye itself. The test is carried out throughout the study till end of treatment Day 29. However, the primary outcome measure itself is determined on Day 29. The scale used to determine the difference in corneal fluorescein staining between RGN-259 and placebo is the ORA scale: 0= no staining (no detectable ocular defect)to 4= confluent staining( severe ocular defect). Worst eye: In the case that both eyes were eligible for analysis, the worst eye was chosen as the eye with the greater increase of inferior corneal staining from Visit 1 to Visit 2. If both eyes were equal, the eye with greater ocular discomfort at Visit 2 was chosen as the worst eye. If both eyes were equal at Visit 2, then the right eye was chosen as the worst eye.

Dry eye causes ocular discomfort, which is measured using a validated 4-point ORA Scale from the start of the dosing till the end of treatment (Day 29). 0 = no discomfort to 4 = constant discomfort. If the measurement is lower, then improvement of ocular discomfort can be inferred. The test is carried out throughout the study till end of treatment Day 29. However, the primary outcome measure itself is determined on Day 29. Worst eye: In the case that both eyes were eligible for analysis, the worst eye was chosen as the eye with the greater increase of inferior corneal staining from Visit 1 to Visit 2. If both eyes were equal, the eye with greater ocular discomfort at Visit 2 was chosen as the worst eye. If both eyes had were equal at Visit 2, then the right eye was chosen as the worst eye.
Secondary Objectives

The Adverse events, which will be followed, are: impairment of visual acuity, an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), and an increase in corneal sensitivity in both eyes.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has no location dataSave this study to your profile to know when the location data is available. 
CompletedNo study centers