Completed

Gemcitabine With or Without Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

gemcitabine hydrochloride

+ bevacizumab
+ placebo
Drug
Biological
Other
Who is being recruted

Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
+2

+ Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer
+ Stage II Pancreatic Cancer
Over 18 Years
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 3
Interventional
Study Start: June 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: June 5, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: June 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and bevacizumab to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine alone in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Bevacizumab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by stopping blood flow to the tumor. Combining gemcitabine with bevacizumab may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without bevacizumab in treating pancreatic cancer. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and bevacizumab achieves superior survival compared to gemcitabine and placebo in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the objective response rates, duration of response, progression free survival, and toxicity of these two regimens in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. II. To measure baseline levels of VEGF and correlate with treatment outcome. III. To measure baseline and on treatment levels of additional growth factors that may be co- or counter- regulated with VEGF and correlate with response to treatment. IV. To measure baseline and on treatment levels of coagulation and endothelial cell activation markers that may predict for thrombotic or bleeding risks related to treatment. V. To generate protein expression profiles using a MALDI-TOF based platform from serum samples. To analyze and compare protein expression profiles to elucidate ion peaks that differentiate patients who respond to therapy from patients who do not respond. To identify proteins responsible for the differentially expressed ion peaks. To develop quantitative assays for each of these proteins. VI. To assess any differences in overall survival within the treatment arm (gemcitabine + bevacizumab), between the two VEGF genotypic groups: Group 1 denoted by individuals with CT or TT genotypes and Group 2 consisting of individuals with CC genotypes. VII. To conduct an exploratory analysis of gene-toxicity, gene-response, and gene-survival relationships for the various polymorphisms described in the genes implicated in gemcitabine pharmacology (CDA, DCK, DCTD, SLC29A1, SLC28A1, SLC29A2). An exploratory quantitative interaction between the genotypes (group 1 or 2) and the treatment arms (gemcitabine + bevacizumab or gemcitabine + placebo) in predicting overall survival will also be evaluated. VIII. To identify specific SNPs and genetic variation that are associated with differences among patients in the risk of toxicity. IX. To compare the effects of gemcitabine + bevacizumab versus gemcitabine + placebo on resource utilization, cost, and utilities, and if applicable, to make estimates of marginal cost-utility. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2), disease extent (metastatic vs locally advanced), and prior radiotherapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15. Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV as in arm I and placebo IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15. In both arms, courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for 3 years. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 590 patients (295 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 26.8 months.

Official TitleA Randomized Phase III Trial Of Gemcitabine Plus Bevacizumab (NSC#704865 IND#7621) Versus Gemcitabine Plus Placebo In Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer 
Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: June 5, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
590 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Neither participants nor researchers know who is receiving which treatment. This is the most rigorous way to reduce bias, ensuring that expectations do not influence the results.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer
Stage II Pancreatic Cancer
Stage III Pancreatic Cancer
Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Histologic or cytologic documentation of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; documentation of disease extent by CT scan is required; radiologically measurable disease is not required; patients with documented invasion of adjacent organs (e.g., duodenum, stomach) by CT scan are not eligible * No prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease * If the patient received adjuvant therapy, it must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment on this study; the patient must have recovered from all treatment related toxicities and must have evidence of disease progression following adjuvant treatment * Prior radiation therapy, with or without a radiosensitizing dose of fluoropyrimidines, is allowed provided the patient has disease outside of the radiation port; at least 4 weeks must have elapsed from completion of the radiation therapy and all signs of toxicity must have resolved * No prior treatment with gemcitabine or bevacizumab in the adjuvant or metastatic setting * No current or recent (within 1 month) use of a thrombolytic agent * Patients may not have had prior therapy with other VEGF inhibitors * No recent invasive surgical procedures; this includes: * Major surgical procedure (e.g. exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy), open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to registration * Fine needle aspirations or venous access device within 7 days prior to registration * Anticipation of need for major surgical procedures during the course of the study * No clinically significant cardiovascular disease; this includes: * Uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure \> 150/90 on medication) * New York Heart Association grade II or greater congestive heart failure * Serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication * No recent (within 6 months) arterial thrombotic events, including transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), unstable angina, or myocardial infarction (MI); patients with clinically significant peripheral artery disease (i.e., claudication on less than one block) are also ineligible * No evidence of CNS disease, including primary brain tumor, or any brain metastasis * No serious or non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture * No serious active infection (viral, fungal bacterial); no infection requiring parenteral antibiotics at time of registration * Patients with known hypersensitivity of Chinese hamster ovary cell products or other recombinant human antibodies are not eligible * Patients with a "currently active" second malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancers are not to be registered; patients are not considered to have a "currently active" malignancy if they have completed therapy and considered by their physician to be at less than 30% risk of relapse * Women must be non-pregnant and non-breast feeding * ECOG Performance status of 0, 1 or 2 * Granulocytes ≥ 1,500/μl * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/μl * Creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min * Total bilirubin ≤ 1 x upper limit of normal * SGOT(AST) ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal * PT INR =\< 1.5, unless patient is on full dose warfarin * Urine protein; for ≥ 1+ proteinuria, 24 hour urine collection must demonstrate \< 1 gm of protein/24 hours * Required diagnostic procedures: * CT of the abdomen * Chest x-ray


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
2 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and bevacizumab IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15.
Group II
Active Comparator
Patients receive gemcitabine IV as in arm I and placebo IV over 30-90 minutes on days 1 and 15.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Based on the stratified logrank test.

This analysis will be done in the context of a two-way multiplicative logistic model with genotype and treatment as the two factors.

Secondary Objectives

The two-way multiplicative Cox model will be used.

The two-way multiplicative Cox model will be used.

This endpoint will be analyzed in the framework of a 3x6 singly ordered contingency table.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 1 location
Suspended
Cancer and Leukemia Group BChicago, United StatesSee the location

CompletedOne Study Center