Completed

Oral Enzastaurin in Participants With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

enzastaurin

Drug
Who is being recruted

Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

Over 18 Years
+7 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: March 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorEli Lilly and Company
Last updated: July 1, 2020
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: March 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

The purposes of this study are to determine the safety of oral enzastaurin and any side effects that might be associated with it and whether enzastaurin can help participants with mantle cell lymphoma.

Official TitleA Phase 2 Study of Oral Enzastaurin HCl in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma 
Principal SponsorEli Lilly and Company
Last updated: July 1, 2020
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
60 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, all participants receive the same treatment. Since there is only one group, there is no need for randomization or assignment to different arms. This type of study is often used to test a new treatment without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned randomly, like flipping a coin, to ensure fairness and reduce bias.

Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Mantle-Cell Lymphoma
Criteria
5 inclusion criteria required to participate
Mantle cell lymphoma

Previous treatment for mantle cell lymphoma

Previously relapsed mantle cell lymphoma with no more than 4 chemotherapy regimens

Have discontinued all previous therapies for cancer, except corticosteroids up to 25 milligrams per day (mg/day)


2 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
Inability to swallow tablets

Must not have significant heart problems

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
One single intervention group 

is designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. The percentage of FFP was computed as the number of participants documented to be progression free after 3 cycles of treatment divided by the number of treated participants and then multiplied by 100.
Secondary Objectives

PFS time was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, participants were considered to have progressive disease if there was a 50% increase in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of the dominant nodal and non-nodal sites or appearance of new-involved site or lesion. Progression-free survival time was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were still alive and who had not had documented progressive disease.

OS was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of death due to any cause. For each participant who was not known to have died as of the data-inclusion cut-off date, OS was censored for that analysis at the date of the last assessment visit prior to the cut-off date.

Duration of overall response for responders was measured from the date that measurement criteria were met for CR, CRu, PR or SD (whichever status occurred first) until the first date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using the Standardized Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas Guidelines, CR was defined as the disappearance of all lesions. CRu was the disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, normal appearance of spleen and greater than 75% regression in lymph node mass. PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the six largest dominant nodes. SD was when the response was poorer than partial response with no new lesions consistent with progressive disease. Duration of response was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for responders who were still alive and had not had documented progressive disease.

Time to new treatment was as the time from enrollment to the date new treatment for the cancer under study was initiated. Time to new treatment was censored at the date of the last assessment visit for participants who were not documented to have initiated a new treatment.

The B symptoms, tumor-related symptoms, participant functioning, and health-related quality of life were assessed with FACT-Lym v. 4. FACT-Lym v. 4 consists of 42 items with 5-point rating scales for each item, where 0 = "not at all" and 4 = "very much." Physical well-being, social/family well-being and functional well-being subscales consist of 7 items each with scores ranging from 0-28. The emotional well-being subscale consists of 6 items with a score ranging from 0-24. The lymphoma tumor - specific subscale consists of 15 items with a score ranging from 0-60. Fact-Lymphoma total score ranges from 0-168. A higher score represents better quality of life.

Overall health status and participant utility values were measured with the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. EuroQol-5D describes health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is divided into 3 levels: 1 (no problem), 2 (some problem), and 3 (extreme problem). The questionnaire records the level of problems on each of 5 dimensions and is converted into the EuroQol-5D index based on preference weights (Dolan 1997), where a score of 0.0 = death and 1.0 = perfect health.

IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine PKCβ expression. Staining intensity was measured on a semiquantitative scale of 0 (or negative) to 3 (high intensity). The final score combined the components of staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells and was defined as \[1 \* (percentage of cells staining at 1)\] + \[2 \* (percentage of cells staining at 2)\] + \[3 \* (percentage of cells staining at 3)\]. Score ≥100 and staining intensity ≥2 indicates high expression for PKCβ, while score \<100 and staining intensity ≤1 indicates low expression for PKCβ.

IHC staining of tumor samples was carried out to determine Ki-67 expression. High expression is defined as the percentage of positive cells ≥40%.

Data presented are the number of participants who experienced SAEs, AEs, deaths due to progressive disease (PD), and deaths due to AEs while on treatment and death during the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

The Steady-state plasma concentrations of total analytes (enzastaurin plus its active metabolite, LSN326020) observed after once-daily dosing were evaluated using sparse sampling methodology.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 17 locations
Suspended
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Monday-Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physicianWoolloongabba, AustraliaSee the location
Suspended
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Monday-Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physicianParkville, Australia
Suspended
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Monday-Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physicianPrahran, Australia
Suspended
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Monday-Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physicianWodonga, Australia

Completed17 Study Centers