Completed

Peak Study - A Study of Pegasys (Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD)) in Combination With Copegus (Ribavirin) in Interferon-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC).

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Ribavirin

+ Peginterferon alfa-2b (PEG-Intron)
+ Ribavirin
Drug
Who is being recruted

Hepatitis C, Chronic

Over 18 Years
+7 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 4
Interventional
Study Start: January 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorHoffmann-La Roche
Last updated: July 1, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: January 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This study will examine the viral kinetics and pharmacokinetics of Pegasys plus ribavirin and PEG-Intron plus ribavirin in interferon-naive patients with CHC. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Official TitleA Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Study Evaluating the Viral Kinetics and Pharmacokinetics of Pegasys® Plus Copegus® and PEG-Intron® Plus Rebetol® in Interferon-naïve Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C. 
Principal SponsorHoffmann-La Roche
Last updated: July 1, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
385 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Hepatitis C, Chronic
Criteria
3 inclusion criteria required to participate
adult patients at least 18 years of age

CHC infection, genotype 1

use of 2 forms of contraception during study in both men and women

4 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
previous systemic therapy with anti-viral, anti-neoplastic, or immunomodulatory agents

medical condition associated with chronic liver disease (e.g., hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, metabolic liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, toxin exposure)

decompensated liver disease

women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
2 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Participants received Peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) \[Pegasys\] at a dosage of 180 microgram (μg), subcutaneously (SC), once a week plus Ribavirin \[Copegus\] 1000 or 1200 milligram (mg)/day), orally, \[according to body weight, lesser than or greater than/equal to (\< or \>/=) 75 kilogram (kg), respectively\] twice daily during the randomized treatment period for 12 weeks. Participants who completed the randomized treatment period of 12 weeks and wished to continue therapy were given Peginterferon alfa-2a 180 μg SC once weekly plus Ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day orally (\< or \>/=75 kg body weight, respectively twice daily for an additional 36 weeks to complete a full 48-week treatment course. After treatment completion, participants were followed-up for safety for 24 weeks.
Group II
Active Comparator
Participants received Peginterferon alfa-2b (12 kD) \[PEG-Intron\] at a dosage of 1.5 μg/kg SC once weekly plus Ribavirin \[Rebetol\] 1000 or 1200 mg/day orally (\< or \>/=75 kg body weight, respectively) twice daily during the randomized treatment period for 12 weeks. Participants who completed the randomized treatment period of 12 weeks and wished to continue therapy were given Peginterferon alfa-2a 180 μg SC once weekly plus Ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg/day orally (\< or \>/=75 kg body weight, respectively) twice daily for an additional 36 weeks to complete a full 48-week treatment course. After treatment completion, participants were followed-up for safety for 24 weeks.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

The viral load was determined quantitatively and qualitatively by Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HCV RNA was measured qualitatively using the Roche amplicor PCR assay (lower limit of detection 60 international units per milliliter (U/mL), changed from 50 IU/mL with amendment B) and quantitatively using the Roche amplicor HCV monitor® test v2.0 (lower limit of quantification 600 IU/mL). Log transformations were performed for HCV RNA, and the analyses were done on a log10 scale. The average value of the difference between viral load levels in the serum from baseline to Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10, are presented.
Secondary Objectives

The viral load was determined quantitatively and qualitatively by HCV-PCR. HCV RNA was measured qualitatively using the Roche amplicor PCR assay (lower limit of detection 60 IU/mL, changed from 50 IU/mL with amendment B) and quantitatively using the Roche amplicor HCV monitor® test v2.0 (lower limit of quantification 600 IU/mL). Log transformations were performed for HCV RNA, and the analyses were done on a log10 scale. The average value of the difference between viral load levels in the serum from baseline to week 4 and week 8, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 are presented.

The viral load was determined quantitatively and qualitatively by HCV-PCR. HCV RNA was measured qualitatively using the Roche amplicor PCR assay (lower limit of detection 60 IU/mL, changed from 50 IU/mL with amendment B) and quantitatively using the Roche amplicor HCV monitor® test v2.0 (lower limit of quantification 600 IU/mL). Log transformations were performed for HCV RNA, and the analyses were done on a log10 scale. The viral load levels in the serum at baseline and for each week, were expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10, and averaged for all participants.

The area under the HCV-RNA curve (HCV AUC) was defined as the area under the polygonal line defined by the HCV RNA values from the beginning of the time window to the end of the time window. Each of these areas was a sum of one or more trapezoids determined from the concentrations over the 7-day interval. The HCV AUC to Week 12 was the sum of the 12 weekly HCV AUCs divided by the time (12 weeks). Summary of weekly HCV AUC values estimated from the two adjacent pre-dose assessments are presented.

The HCV AUC was calculated for each week as the area under the polygonal line defined by the HCV RNA values from the beginning of the time window to the end of the time window. Each of these areas was a sum of one or more trapezoids determined from the concentrations over the 7-day interval. The weekly AUCMB was calculated by subtracting the Week -1 HCV AUC (i.e., baseline) from the weekly HCV AUC and presented.

The area under the HCV-RNA curve (HCV AUC) was calculated for each week as the area under the polygonal line defined by the HCV RNA values from the beginning of the window to the end of the window. Each of these areas was a sum of one or more trapezoids determined from the concentrations over the 7-day interval. The weekly AUCMB was calculated by subtracting the Week -1 HCV AUC (i.e., baseline) from the weekly HCV AUC. The HCV AUCMB to Week 12 was the sum of the 12 weekly HCV AUCMBs divided by the time (12 weeks).

The area under the HCV-RNA curve (HCV AUC) was defined as the area under the polygonal line defined by the HCV RNA values from the beginning of the window to the end of the window. For the frequent-sampling cohort, HCV AUCs over 7 days were calculated for Weeks 1 and 8, with intervals calculated beginning at the dose after which the frequent sampling began (different from the 7-day calendar period used for other AUC calculations). The AUCs for Weeks 1 and 8 in the frequent-sampling cohort (Sparse samples \[SS\] and frequent samples \[FS\]) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule.

The virological response was determined as the proportion/percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-log10 decrease or undetectable HCV RNA at each week. Detection of \>= 2-log10 decrease of \<60 IU/mL HCV-RNA was done by amplicor PCR assay at each week. Detection of \>=2-log10 decrease or undetectable HCV RNA at Week 12 was considered an early virological response (EVR).

The viral load was determined quantitatively and qualitatively by HCV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Qualitative viral titers will be assessed by Roche amplicor HCV Monitor® test v2.0 (\< 600 IU/mL). The virological response was determined as the percentage of participants with undetectable HCV RNA at each week. A \<60 IU/mL HCV-RNA was measured by amplicor PCR assay.

The values outside the marked reference range for any hematology parameter that represents a defined, clinically relevant change from baseline are considered marked hematology abnormalities. The Roche standard reference ranges for the hematology parameters for which subjects had marked abnormalities were hematocrit \[(RR) is 0.42 - 0.52 (fraction)\], hemoglobin (RR is 13.0 - 18.0 gram/deciliter), platelets (RR is 150 - 450 10\^9 cells/L), white blood cells (WBC) (RR is 4.3 - 10.8 10\^9 cells/L), basophils (RR is 0.00 - 0.15 10\^9 cells/L), lymphocytes (RR is 1.50 - 4.00 10\^9 cells/L), monocytes (RR is 0.20 - 0.95 10\^9 cells/L), neutrophils (RR is 1.83 - 7.25 10\^9 cells/L), prothrombin time (PT) (RR is 9 - 13 seconds), partial thromboplastin time (Partial Throm.) (Time) (RR is 25.0 - 38.0 seconds) and PT International normalized ratio (INR) \[RR is 0.70 - 1.30 (ratio)\]. Summary data of number of participants with only marked hematology abnormalities are presented.

Values outside the marked RR for biochemical test parameters that represent a defined, clinically relevant change from baseline are considered marked biochemical test abnormalities. Roche's standard RR for biochemical parameters were used for this analysis. The biochemical test parameters with marked abnormalities were alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) (RR is 0 - 30 units per liter \[U/L\]), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) (RR is 0 - 25 U/L), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (RR is 0 - 60 U/L), total bilirubin (RR is 0 - 17 micromole/liter \[umol/L\]), creatinine (RR is 0 - 133 umol/L), total protein (RR is 60 - 80 g/L), triglycerides (RR is 0.45 - 1.70 millimole/liter \[mmol/L\]), chloride (RR is 100 - 108 mmol/L), potassium (RR is 3.5 - 5.0 mmol/L), sodium (RR is 133 - 145 mmol/L), calcium (RR is 2.10 - 2.60 mmol/L), random glucose (RR is 3.89 - 7.83 mmol/L), uric acid (140 - 500 umol/L). Summary data of number of participants with only marked biochemical test abnormalities are presented.

Values outside the marked reference ranges for thyroid function test parameters that represent a defined, clinically relevant change from baseline are considered marked thyroid function test abnormalities. Roche's standard reference ranges for thyroid function test parameters were used for the analysis. The thyroid function parameters with marked abnormalities were triiodothyronine (T3) (RR is 1.20 - 3.00 nanomole/liter \[nmol/L\]), thyroxine (T4) (RR is 51 - 154 nmol/L) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (RR is 0.0 - 5.0 milliunits per liter \[mU/L\]). Summary data of number of participants with only marked abnormalities in thyroid function tests are presented.

The weekly Interferon (IFN) concentrations were calculated using the trapezoid rule. The trough IFN concentration was analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with limits of quantification of 250 picograms per milliliter \[pg/mL\] for Pegasys and 150 pg/mL for PEG-Intron respectively.

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Interferon (IFN) for Week 1 and Week 8 in the frequent-sampling cohort were calculated using the trapezoidal rule.

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who is administered a study treatment regardless of whether or not the event has a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE, therefore, could be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the study treatment, whether or not related to the treatment. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect. Number of participants with at least one AE and SAE were reported.

The determination of evolution of HCV quasispecies in participants was planned through analyzing viral sequences in serum samples drawn at baseline and at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 if HCV RNA tests were positive and if the levels were sufficient to do the analysis.

The estimation of weekly AUC for IFN concentrations for Pegasys and PEG-Intron was planned through population pharmacokinetic modeling. A population pharmacokinetic method deals with modelling in a cohort which has many participants (usually more than 40). The estimation of weekly AUC for IFN concentrations for Pegasys and PEG-Intron was planned to be studied in the population rather than the individuals in Peginterferon alfa-2a + Ribavirin and Peginterferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin groups.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 41 locations
Suspended
Unknown FacilityBirmingham, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Unknown FacilityLittle Rock, United States
Suspended
Unknown FacilitySacramento, United States
Suspended
Unknown FacilitySan Diego, United States

Completed41 Study Centers