Completed

Comparing Smoking Treatment Programs for Lighter Smokers - 1

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

nicotine transdermal system

+ bupropion
+ Medication Management
Drug
Behavioral
Who is being recruted

Tobacco Use Disorder

From 18 to 75 Years
+2 Eligibility Criteria

See all eligibility criteria

How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Placebo-Controlled
Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: September 2003

See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorUniversity of Pennsylvania
Last updated: August 6, 2019
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: September 1, 2003Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

The purpose of this study was to compare two different types of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved smoking cessation medications (nicotine patch or bupropion) used in conjunction with two levels of counseling. It was hypothesized that the higher level of counseling would have the highest rates of treatment completion and highest rates of abstinence. The study compared a minimal level counseling model to a higher level counseling model plus one of two types of FDA approved smoking cessation products (bupropion or the nicotine patch)used to achieve long term abstinence among lighter smokers. Each participant received both products under blinded conditions meaning that neither the participant nor the counselor knew which product was real or a placebo. The primary goal was to determine the combination or combinations of high or low intensity counseling and pharmacotherapy (either bupropion or the nicotine patch) that were most effective for lighter smokers. The main hypothesis was that higher level counseling would contribute to improved outcomes meaning that more counseling would be associated higher abstinence rates following the completion of treatment and at longer term follow-up.

Official TitleComparing Smoking Treatment Programs for Lighter Smokers 
Principal SponsorUniversity of Pennsylvania
Last updated: August 6, 2019
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
260 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.
None (Single-arm trial): If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment: Everyone gets the same treatment.
Cross-over assignment: Participants switch between treatments during the study.
Factorial assignment: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.
Sequential assignment: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.
Other assignment: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a placebo-controlled study, some participants receive the experimental treatment, while others receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. This method helps to isolate the effect of the treatment from the psychological effects of receiving any treatment at all.

Other Options
Non-placebo-controlled: No placebo is used. All participants receive the actual treatment or alternative interventions (often the Standard of Care), and comparisons are made between these treatments.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers do not know which treatment is being given. This is the most complete way to prevent bias and keep the study as neutral as possible.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.
Single-blind: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.
Double-blind: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.
Triple-blind: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 75 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Tobacco Use Disorder
Criteria
1 inclusion criteria required to participate
entally and physically stable, non-pregnant, light smokers (6-15 cigarettes per day)
1 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
lease contact site for more information

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
4 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

25% chance 

of being blinded to the placebo group

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
bupropion and MM counseling with placebo patch
Group II
Experimental
bupropion and Mayo counseling with placebo patch.
Group III
Placebo
patch and MM counseling with placebo pills
Group IV
Experimental
patch and Mayo counseling with placebo pills
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Completion of Treatment and Smoking Cessation by Two Different Types of Medications and Counseling Types at 12, 26, and 52 Weeks Post-treatment Initiation. The counseling types were Medication Management (MM) and Mayo counseling models. MM counseling was a 4 session lower intensity counseling model and Mayo counseling was a 10 session higher intensity model. A twofold definition of treatment completion included both medication and counseling session adherence. Treatment completion was defined as consistently taking the active medication as prescribed (80%) of the time during the medication period and attending at least 7 of the 10 required High C sessions or 3 of the 4 Low C sessions. Participants had to meet both requirements to be designated as full treatment completers. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence was the primary measure of abstinence at follow-up Weeks 12, 24, and 52. Abstinence was confirmed by biochemical testing.
Secondary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 1 location
Suspended
University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, United StatesSee the location
CompletedOne Study Center