Completed

Lexapro and Pramipexole and to Treat Major Depression

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Pramipexole

+ Escitalopram
Drug
Who is being recruted

Major Depression

From 18 to 65 Years
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: June 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Last updated: January 28, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: June 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This study compares the effectiveness of the combination of antidepressants: Lexapro and Pramipexole, with the effectiveness of each antidepressant alone. Purpose: Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with Major Depressive Disorder without psychotic features may be eligible for this 9-week study. Candidates must currently be in a major depressive episode of at least 4 weeks' duration, have failed to respond to treatment with an SSRI (Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Luvox, Celexa), and not have failed to respond to more than four antidepressants for the current episode. Candidates are screened with a physical examination, psychiatric evaluation, blood tests, review of vital signs, height and weight measurements, electrocardiogram (ECG), urine test for illegal drugs, and pregnancy test for women. Participants are tapered off antidepressants or other medications prohibited during the study and remain drug-free for 1 week before starting treatment. They are then randomly assigned to take pramipexole and escitalopram, pramipexole alone, or escitalopram alone for 6 weeks. During the study, participants come to the clinic eight times for health assessments and symptoms assessments, which include a check of vital signs and rating scales for depression and anxiety, adverse events, and sexual functioning. Blood and urine samples are collected periodically to monitor health, detect pregnancy in women, and detect illicit drug use. At the end of the 6-week treatment period, participants have a physical examination, ECG, blood test, and check of vital signs. Short-term anti-depressant treatment is offered, and plans are made for long-term treatment. Atendemos pacientes de habla hispana. ... Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors \[SSRIs\]) treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Furthermore, these medications may take weeks to months to achieve their full effects, and in the meantime, patients continue to suffer from their symptoms and continue to be at risk of self-harm as well as harm to their personal and professional lives. Thus, there is a clear need to develop novel and improved therapeutics for treatment-resistant major depression that are more effective and have a rapid onset of action. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that antidepressants with a combined mechanism of action (e.g., combination of a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) may be more effective than either agent alone in achieving remission (Nelson et al 2004). Thus, it stands to reason that other combinations of antidepressants with other mechanisms of action when combined may have a synergistic effect that is superior to an antidepressant with a single mechanism of action. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that the dopaminergic system may play a major role in the pathophysiology of depression. Preclinical studies suggest synergistic antidepressant effects with the combination of a SSRI and a selective D3 receptor agonist in animal models of depression. Similarly, preliminary clinical studies suggest synergism with combination treatment that affects the serotonin and dopamine systems. Together, these data suggests that treatments which affect the serotonin and dopamine systems will be more effective than agents which use a single mechanism. We propose to compare the combination of a selective dopaminergic agonist and a SSRI in patients with treatment-resistant major depression. To our knowledge, this will be the only controlled double-blind study to date that will examine the efficacy of a serotonin and dopamine combination given from the start of treatment. Patients, ages 18 years or older, with a diagnosis of major depression (without psychotic features), will be randomized to the combination of a selective dopaminergic receptor agonist and a SSRI or either drug alone for a period of 6 weeks. Acute efficacy will be determined by demonstrating a greater remission rate using specified criteria. Approximately 115 patients with acute major depression will be enrolled in the study.

Official TitleCombining a Dopamine Agonist and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor for Treatment of Depression: A Double-Blind, Randomized Study 
Principal SponsorNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Last updated: January 28, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
39 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers do not know which treatment is being given. This is the most complete way to prevent bias and keep the study as neutral as possible.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 65 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Major Depression
Criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA: 1. Male or female subjects, 18 to 65 years of age. 2. Female subjects of childbearing potential must be using a medically accepted means of contraception. 3. Each subject must have a level of understanding sufficient to agree to all required tests and examinations and sign an informed consent document. 4. Subjects must fulfill DSM-IV criteria for Major Depression (296.33) without psychotic features, based on clinical assessment and confirmed by a structured diagnostic interview, SCID-P. 5. Subjects must have an initial score of greater than or equal to 20 on the MADRS at Visit 1 and Visit 2. 6. Subjects must not have a greater than a 25% decrease in the MADRS total scores during washout (between Visits 1 and 2). 7. Current or past history of lack of response to at least one adequate antidepressant trial (SSRI) operationally defined using the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) (Sackeim 2001b). If this criteria has not been met, a four-week prospective trial of a standard antidepressant (at the patients' and clinicians' discretion) may be given. Subjects are excluded if greater than four failed antidepressant trials for the current major depressive (adequate dose and duration as defined by the ATHF). 8. Current major depressive episode of at least 4 weeks duration. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 9. Presence of psychotic features or a diagnosis of Schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder as defined in the DSM-IV. 10. Subjects with a history of DSM-IV drug or alcohol dependency or abuse (except for nicotine or caffeine) within the preceding 3 months. 11. Previously failed to respond to an adequate trial (dose and duration) of escitalopram. 12. Female subjects who are either pregnant or nursing. 13. Serious, unstable illnesses including hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, cardiovascular (including ischemic heart disease), endocrinologic, neurologic, immunologic, or hematologic disease. 14. Subjects with uncorrected hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. 15. Subjects with one or more seizures without a clear and resolved etiology. 16. Previous treatment with pramipexole. 17. Treatment with a reversible MAOI within 2 weeks prior to Visit 2. 18. Treatment with fluoxetine within 5 weeks prior to Visit 2. 19. Treatment with any other concomitant medication not allowed (Appendix A) 7 days prior to study Visit 2. 20. Treatment with clozapine or ECT within 3 months prior to study Visit 2. 21. Judged clinically to be an acute suicidal risk. 22. Psychotherapy will not be permitted during the study.


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
3 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Active Comparator
Patients receive pramipexole and placebo. The dosage of pramipexole is 0.125 milligrams (mg) three times per day in the first week, 0.250 mg three times per day in the second week, 0.5 mg three times per day in the third week, and 0.75 mg three times per day in the fourth week and thereafter.
Group II
Active Comparator
Patients receive escitalopram and placebo. The dosage of escitalopram is 10 milligrams (mg) per day.
Group III
Experimental
Patients receive escitalopram and pramipexole. The dosage of escitalopram is 10 milligrams (mg) per day. The dosage of pramipexole is 0.125 mg three times per day in the first week, 0.250 mg three times per day in the second week, 0.5 mg three times per day in the third week, and 0.75 mg three times per day in the fourth week and thereafter.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10 item scale for assessing the severity of depression. Items are rated on a scale of 0 to 6, so the maximum score is 60 and the minimum is 0, where 60 is the most severe depression. Scores of 18 or greater are generally considered to indicate a moderate level of depression.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 1 location
Suspended
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville PikeBethesda, United StatesSee the location

CompletedOne Study Center