Suspended

A Trial of Reduced Intensity Conditioning and Transplantation of Haplotype Mismatched and KIR Class I Epitope-Mismatched Highly Purified CD34 Cells

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

alemtuzumab

+ cyclosporine
+ fludarabine phosphate
Biological
Drug
Procedure
Radiation
Who is being recruted

Blood Protein Disorders
+37

+ Bone Marrow Diseases
+ Cardiovascular Diseases
From 18 to 60 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 1 & 2
Interventional
Study Start: May 2006
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: May 1, 2006Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

OBJECTIVES: * Determine the ability of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen comprising alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan with or without cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and low-dose total body radiotherapy followed by haplotype-mismatched, KIR class I epitope-mismatched CD34-positive allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation to facilitate engraftment by day 35 post-transplantation in at least 85% of patients with relapsed, refractory, or poor-risk hematological malignancies. * Determine the risk of graft-versus-host-disease in patients treated with these regimens. * Determine, preliminarily, the efficacy of these regimens, in terms of progression-free survival, in these patients. * Correlate outcomes, engraftment, and progression-free survival with the number of detectable alloreactive natural killer cell clones before transplantation and after engraftment in patients treated with these regimens. * Determine immune reconstitution in patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, pilot study. Patients are initially treated with conditioning regimen A. If adequate donor engraftment is not achieved, subsequent patients are treated with conditioning regimen B. * Conditioning regimen A: Patients receive alemtuzumab IV over 2 hours on days -14 to -12; fludarabine IV over 30 minutes on days -7 to -3; and melphalan IV over 20-30 minutes on day -2. * Conditioning regimen B: Patients receive oral or IV cyclosporine twice daily and oral or IV mycophenolate mofetil twice daily on days -15 to 0. Patients also receive alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan as in conditioning regimen A. Patients undergo low-dose total body irradiation twice daily on days -2 and -1. All patients undergo allogeneic, T-cell-depleted, CD34-positive peripheral blood stem cell transplantation on day 0. Patients receive sargramostim (GM-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 1 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for 5 years. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 14-56 patients (14-28 per regimen) will be accrued for this study.

Official TitleA Trial of Reduced Intensity Conditioning and Transplantation of Haplotype Mismatched and KIR Class I Epitope-Mismatched Highly Purified CD34 Cells 
NCT00085449
Principal SponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, all participants receive the same treatment. Since there is only one group, there is no need for randomization or assignment to different arms. This type of study is often used to test a new treatment without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned randomly, like flipping a coin, to ensure fairness and reduce bias.

Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 60 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Blood Protein Disorders
Bone Marrow Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Disease
Hematologic Diseases
Hemorrhagic Disorders
Immune System Diseases
Immunoproliferative Disorders
Leukemia
Leukemia
Lymphatic Diseases
Lymphoma
Lymphoma
Lymphoma
Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Myeloproliferative Disorders
Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Paraproteinemias
Paraproteinemias
Pathologic Processes
Plasmacytoma
Plasmacytoma
Precancerous Conditions
Preleukemia
Preleukemia
Syndrome
Vascular Diseases
Hemostatic Disorders
Hemostatic Disorders
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell
Myelodysplastic-Myeloproliferative Diseases
Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed hematological malignancy of 1 of the following types: * Acute myeloid leukemia meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: * Poor-risk cytogenetics, including -5, 5q-, -7, 7q-, 11q23, and Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive in first or subsequent complete remission (CR) * Relapsed or primary refractory disease with ≤ 10% blasts in the peripheral blood and ≤ 20% blasts in the bone marrow * Standard-risk cytogenetics in second CR AND autologous transplantation is not feasible * Standard-risk cytogenetics in third or subsequent CR * Acute lymphoblastic leukemia meeting 1 of the following criteria: * Second or subsequent CR * High-risk cytogenetics, including Ph chromosome-positive and t(4:11) in first CR * Relapsed or primarily refractory disease with ≤ 10% blasts in the peripheral blood and ≤ 20% blasts in the bone marrow * High-risk myelodysplasia * International Prognostic Scoring System Score ≥ 2.5 * Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)\* with an inadequate response to imatinib meeting 1 of the following criteria: * Second or subsequent chronic phase * Accelerated phase NOTE: \*Patients with CML in blast crisis (\> 30% promyelocytes and myeloblasts in the bone marrow) are not eligible * Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma meeting 1 of the following criteria: * Primarily refractory disease or in refractory relapse * Relapsed disease after autologous stem cell transplantation * Chemosensitive relapsed disease without CR to standard salvage therapy AND no option for autologous stem cell transplantation due to blood or marrow involvement or failure to harvest sufficient autologous stem cells * Chronic lymphocytic leukemia meeting both of the following criteria: * Stage III or IV disease * Refractory to fludarabine * Multiple myeloma meeting 1 of the following criteria: * Primarily refractory disease or in refractory relapse * Relapsed disease after autologous stem cell transplantation * No relapsed disease \< 6 months after autologous stem cell transplantation * No available eligible HLA-matched (i.e., 5 of 6 or 6 of 6 antigen match for HLA-A, -B, and -DR loci) family donor by serological or molecular typing * Available suitable family donor meeting the following criteria: * Parent, sibling, or child of the recipient * ≥ 16 years of age * Identical for only one HLA haplotype (i.e., haploidentical) AND incompatible at the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DR loci of the unshared haplotype by serological or molecular typing * Mismatched with respect to KIR class I epitopes graft-vs-host directional activity * Mismatching that predicts both graft-vs-host and host-vs-graft bi-directional activity eligible * No mismatching that predicts only host-vs-graft directional activity PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age * 18 to 60 Performance status * ECOG 0-1 Hepatic * Bilirubin \< 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * AST and ALT \< 2 times ULN Renal * Creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dL Cardiovascular * LVEF \> 40% (corrected) Pulmonary * DLCO \> 50% of predicted Other * No active infection requiring oral or IV antibiotics * HIV negative * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * Fertile patients must use effective contraception PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy * See Disease Characteristics Chemotherapy * See Disease Characteristics Endocrine therapy * Concurrent corticosteroids allowed for adrenal failure, treatment of graft-vs-host disease, or as premedication during study * No concurrent corticosteroids for antiemesis

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
One single intervention group 

is designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Conditioning regimen A: Patients receive alemtuzumab IV over 2 hours on days -14 to -12; fludarabine IV over 30 minutes on days -7 to -3; and melphalan IV over 20-30 minutes on day -2. Conditioning regimen B: Patients receive oral or IV cyclosporine twice daily and oral or IV mycophenolate mofetil twice daily on days -15 to 0. Patients also receive alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan as in conditioning regimen A. Patients undergo low-dose total body irradiation twice daily on days -2 and -1. All patients undergo allogeneic, T-cell-depleted, CD34-positive peripheral blood stem cell transplantation on day 0. Patients receive sargramostim (GM-CSF) subcutaneously beginning on day 1 and continuing until blood counts recover. Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for 5 years.

Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 24 locations
Suspended
Moores UCSD Cancer CenterLa Jolla, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos Angeles, United States
Suspended
UCSF Comprehensive Cancer CenterSan Francisco, United States
Suspended
CCOP - Christiana Care Health ServicesNewark, United States
Suspended24 Study Centers