Completed

Cilengitide, Temozolomide, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

cilengitide

+ temozolomide
+ radiation therapy
Drug
Radiation
Other
Who is being recruted

Adult Giant Cell Glioblastoma

+ Adult Glioblastoma
+ Adult Gliosarcoma
Over 18 Years
+19 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 1
Interventional
Study Start: April 2005

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: February 25, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: April 1, 2005Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Cilengitide may stop the growth of cancer by stopping blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Giving cilengitide together with temozolomide and radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. This randomized phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of cilengitide when given together with temozolomide and radiation therapy and to compare how well they work in treating patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess the safety profile of EMD 121974 (cilengitide) when administered as a one-hour infusion twice a week concurrently with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide with radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. (Safety Run-In) II. To estimate overall survival in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with EMD 121974 concurrently with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide with radiation therapy. (Phase II) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate and compare overall survival between a low dose treatment group and a high dose treatment group in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with EMD 121974 concurrently with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide with radiation therapy. (Phase II) II. To determine the toxicity of EMD 121974 (cilengitide) when it is administered in conjunction with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. (Phase II) III. To evaluate the molecular profile of individual patients and correlate molecular expression profiles with clinical outcomes. (Phase II) IV. To characterize tumor blood volume, tumor blood flow, and permeability ratios using perfusion MR in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme and follow these parameters during treatment with EMD 121974 (cilengitide). (Phase II) OUTLINE: This is an open-label, multicenter, safety run-in study of cilengitide followed by a randomized phase II study. Safety Run-In: INITIATION COURSE: Patients receive cilengitide IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats weekly for 10 weeks. Patients also receive oral temozolomide and undergo radiotherapy one hour later on days 1-5 of weeks 1-6. MAINTENANCE COURSES: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-5 in courses 1-6. Patients also receive cilengitide IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Cohorts of 3-6 patients receive escalating doses of cilengitide (3 Pre-defined study dose levels are defined as: 500, 1000 and 2000mg). The MTD is defined as the dose preceding that at which 2 of 3 or 3 of 6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity. If no MTD (maximum tolerable dose) is defined through three steps of the dose escalation process, we will pursue the phase II safety/efficacy study with randomized treatment allocation. Patients will be randomized into one of two pre-specified treatment dosage arms, 500mg group or 2000mg group. PHASE II: Patients are stratified according to age (50 and under vs over 50), Karnofsky performance score (60%-80% vs 90%-100%), and tumor status (measurable vs nonmeasurable). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive radiotherapy and temozolomide as in safety run-in initiation course and cilengitide at the lower dose as in safety run-in initiation and maintenance courses. ARM II: Patients receive radiotherapy and temozolomide as in safety run-in initiation course and cilengitide at the higher dose as in safety run-in initiation and maintenance courses. Patients are followed every 2 months. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 9-112 patients (9-18 for safety run-in and 94 \[47 per treatment arm\] for phase II) will be accrued for this study within 1.5-37 months

Official TitleA Safety Run-in/Randomized Phase II Trial of EMD 121974 in Conjunction With Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme 
Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: February 25, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
112 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Adult Giant Cell Glioblastoma
Adult Glioblastoma
Adult Gliosarcoma
Criteria
13 inclusion criteria required to participate
Patients must have histologically confirmed supratentorial grade IV astrocytoma (glioblastoma multiforme)

Patients must not have received prior radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy or therapy with biologic agent (including immunotoxins, immunoconjugates, antisense, peptide receptor antagonists, interferons, interleukins, TIL, LAK or gene therapy), or hormonal therapy for their brain tumor; glucocorticoid therapy is allowed

Patients must have a Karnofsky performance status >= 60% (i.e. the patient must be able to care for himself/herself with occasional help from others)

Absolute neutrophil count >= 1500/mm\^3


6 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
Patients with serious concurrent infection or medical illness, which would jeopardize the ability of the patient to receive the treatment outlined in this protocol with reasonable safety

Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding

Patients receiving concurrent therapy for their tumor (i.e. chemotherapeutics or investigational agents)

Patients with a concurrent or prior malignancy are ineligible unless they are patients with curatively treated carcinoma-in-situ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin; patients who have been free of disease (any prior malignancy) for >= five years are eligible for this study


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
3 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
INITIATION COURSE: Patients receive cilengitide IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats weekly for 10 weeks. Patients also receive oral temozolomide and undergo radiotherapy one hour later on days 1-5 of weeks 1-6. MAINTENANCE COURSES: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-5 in courses 1-6. Patients also receive cilengitide IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Doses of cilengitide: 500mg, 1000mg and 2000mg Temozolimide, Radiation Therapy, laboratory biomarker analysis, pharmacological study
Group II
Experimental
INITIATION COURSE: Patients receive cilengitide (500mg) IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats weekly for 10 weeks. Patients also receive oral temozolomide and undergo radiotherapy one hour later on days 1-5 of weeks 1-6. MAINTENANCE COURSES: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-5 in courses 1-6. Patients also receive cilengitide IV (500mg) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. cilengitide, Temozolimide, Radiation Therapy, laboratory biomarker analysis, pharmacological study
Group III
Experimental
INITIATION COURSE: Patients receive cilengitide (2000mg) IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats weekly for 10 weeks. Patients also receive oral temozolomide and undergo radiotherapy one hour later on days 1-5 of weeks 1-6. MAINTENANCE COURSES: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-5 in courses 1-6. Patients also receive cilengitide IV (2000mg) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, and 25. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. cilengitide,Temozolimide, Radiation Therapy, laboratory biomarker analysis, pharmacological study
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

pts will be evaluated from first dose through end of initiation cycle. (6 weeks of RT+TMZ +EMD and 4 weeks of EMD alone) to review dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (Phase I) DLT defined as: Known TMZ hematological toxicities will not be considered dose limiting. Nonhematological toxicities Grades 3-4 severity (except nausea and vomiting without sufficient antiemetic prophylaxis)

pts will be evaluated from first dose through end of initiation cycle. (6 weeks of RT+TMZ +EMD and 4 weeks of EMD alone) to review any dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (safety run-in) DLT defined as: Known TMZ hematological toxicities will not be considered dose limiting. cohorts at these 3 defined doses: 500mg, 1000mg and 2000mg MTD defined as: dose producing DLT in 2 out of 6 patients or dose level below the dose which produced DLT in \>/= 2 out of 3 patients, or in \>/= 3 out of 6 patients If no MTD (maximum tolerable dose) was defined through 3 steps of dose escalation, phase 2 will proceed with a randomized treatment allocation of the two pre-specified dosage arms: low dose; 500mg and high dose; 2000mg

The overall survival is calculated from time of histological diagnosis to death occurance - median based on all 112 patients, all dose levels
Secondary Objectives

survival calculated from date of initial histologic diagnosis and occurence of death. Pts at 500mg dose compared against Pts treated at 2000mg dose. Calculated using median

The proportion of patients with grade 3 and grade 4 hematologic and non hematologic adverse events per CTCAE 4.0

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 8 locations
Suspended
University of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Emory UniversityAtlanta, United States
Suspended
Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, United States
Suspended
Massachusetts General HospitalBoston, United States

Completed8 Study Centers