Completed

Depsipeptide in Unresectable Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

romidepsin

Drug
Who is being recruted

Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx
+1

+ Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx
+ Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity
Over 18 Years
+24 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: June 2005

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: March 5, 2021
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: June 1, 2005Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This phase II trial is studying how well FR901228 works in treating patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (cancer) of the head and neck. Drugs used in chemotherapy such as FR901228 work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the rate of disease control (i.e., achievement of complete response, partial response, or stable disease) of the single agent depsipeptide in patients with unresectable recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the duration of response, time to progression, and overall survival for patients with incurable head and neck cancer treated with depsipeptide. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the extent of histone hyperacetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as a readout of depsipeptide activity before and after depsipeptide administration, to correlate this activity with observed histone hyperacetylation in tumor and mucosal cells, and to correlate extent of depsipeptide activity with tumor response. II. To determine depsipeptide-induced changes in the gene expression profile of tumor cells from biopsies of accessible tumor tissue and of mucosal cells from transepithelial oral brush biopsies using cDNA microarrays containing 28,000 clones, and to correlate these changes with extent of histone hyperacetylation observed in PBMCs and tumor tissues. III. To determine depsipeptide-induced changes in methylation of candidate genes in tumor cells and oral mucosa epithelia. IV. To demonstrate altered expression of signaling and cell cycle-related proteins in tumor tissue in response to depsipeptide. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients receive FR901228 (depsipeptide) IV over 4 hours on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years.

Official TitleA Phase II Study of Single Agent Depsipeptide (FK228; NSC 630176; IND 51,810) in Patients With Unresectable Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck 
Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: March 5, 2021
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
14 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, all participants receive the same treatment. Since there is only one group, there is no need for randomization or assignment to different arms. This type of study is often used to test a new treatment without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned randomly, like flipping a coin, to ensure fairness and reduce bias.

Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx
Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx
Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity
Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx
Criteria
17 inclusion criteria required to participate
histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (MedDRA code 90002024), excluding nasopharyngeal primaries, which is unresectable or metastatic; the disease must be incurable with surgery or radiation therapy; the tumor should preferably be present at the primary site, and it must be accessible to planned biopsy methods

Measurable disease by RECIST

May have received any number of prior systemic chemotherapy regimen for unresectable, recurrent or metastatic disease; if the only site of measurable disease is a previously irradiated area, the patient must have documented progressive disease or biopsy-proven residual carcinoma; persistent disease after radiotherapy must be biopsy-proven at least 8 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy

Life expectancy of greater than 3 months


7 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
Patients should not have had prior therapy with depsipeptide and may not be receiving any other investigational agents or drugs known to have histone deacetylase inhibitor activity such as sodium valproate

Patients with known brain metastases should be excluded from this clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse events

Significant cardiac disease including congestive heart failure that meets New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV definitions (see Appendix II), history of myocardial infarction within one year of study entry, uncontrolled dysrhythmias, or poorly controlled angina

History of serious ventricular arrhythmia (VT or VF, > 3 beats in a row), QTc \> 500 msec, or LVEF < 40%


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
One single intervention group 

is designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Patients receive FR901228 (depsipeptide) IV over 4 hours on days 1, 8, and 15. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Tumor response was assessed every eight weeks per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions as assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. Stable disease (SD) was defined as having no evidence of response (CR or PR) as best response to therapy, and no evidence of disease progression (appearance of new lesions or \>/= 30% increase in target lesions) at 8 weeks.
Secondary Objectives

All time to event endpoints will be evaluated using Kaplan Meier estimates and survival curves will be generated based on these estimates.

All time to event endpoints will be evaluated using Kaplan Meier estimates and survival curves will be generated based on these estimates. One and two-year survival and median survival time (if attained) will be estimated and reported with 95% confidence limits. If the sample sizes are sufficient, subgroup analysis based on baseline factors will be performed using the log rank test to compare survival curves.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 2 locations
Suspended
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteBoston, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Montefiore Medical CenterBronx, United States

Completed2 Study Centers