Suspended

Natalizumab in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Subjects Receiving Methotrexate

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

natalizumab

+ placebo
Drug
Who is being recruted

Rheumatoid Arthritis

From 18 to 75 Years
+26 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Placebo-Controlled
Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: May 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorBiogen
Last updated: July 18, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: May 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of natalizumab in subjects diagnosed with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving concomitant treatment with methotrexate (MTX). It is thought that natalizumab may stop the movement of certain white blood cells, known as lymphocytes, into joint tissue. These cells are thought to cause damage in the joints leading to the symptoms of RA.

Official TitleA Phase II, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Natalizumab (300 mg) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Receiving Concomitant Treatment With Methotrexate (MTX) 
Principal SponsorBiogen
Last updated: July 18, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
299 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a placebo-controlled study, some participants receive the experimental treatment, while others receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. This method helps to isolate the effect of the treatment from the psychological effects of receiving any treatment at all.

Other Options
Non-placebo-controlled
: No placebo is used. All participants receive the actual treatment or alternative interventions (often the Standard of Care), and comparisons are made between these treatments.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Neither participants nor researchers know who is receiving which treatment. This is the most rigorous way to reduce bias, ensuring that expectations do not influence the results.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 75 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Criteria
8 inclusion criteria required to participate
ubjects will be eligible to begin study participation if they meet all of the following inclusion criteria

Subject is able to read, understand, and voluntarily sign the approved Informed Consent form prior to the performance of any study-specific procedures

Male or female subjects, ≥18 to ≤75 years of age, who has a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis Functional Class 1 to 3 by the 1987 Revised American Rheumatism Association Criteria for the Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis for at least 6 months prior to screening

Subject is on a stable dose of MTX of at least 10 mg/week for ≥3 months prior to randomization (Month 0) without an adequate response


18 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
ubjects will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following exclusion criteria

Subject is pregnant or lactating

Subject who has experienced an inadequate therapeutic response after at least 3 months of treatment with at least one TNF-alpha inhibitor

Subject who has received treatment with anakinra


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
2 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

50% chance 

of being blinded to the placebo group

Treatment Groups
Group I
Active Comparator
Group II
Placebo
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

≥20% reduction from baseline in painful/tender joint count and swollen joint count and ≥20% improvement in at least three of five secondary clinical parameters (e.g., subject global assessment, physician global assessment, pain scale, disability score, and an acute phase reactant)
Secondary Objectives

≥50% reduction from baseline in painful/tender joint count and swollen joint count and ≥50% improvement in at least three of five secondary clinical parameters (e.g., subject global assessment, physician global assessment, pain scale, disability score, and an acute phase reactant)

≥70% reduction from baseline in painful/tender joint count and swollen joint count and ≥70% improvement in at least three of five secondary clinical parameters (e.g., subject global assessment, physician global assessment, pain scale, disability score, and an acute phase reactant)

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 12 locations
Suspended
University of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Clinical Research Unit / University of ArizonaTucson, United States
Suspended
Arthritis Medical Clinic of North County, Inc.Escondido, United States
Suspended
Jacksonville Center for Clinical ResearchJacksonville, United States

Suspended12 Study Centers