Suspended

Phase II Trial of 5-FU, Leucovorin, Gemcitabine, and Cisplatin for Adenocarcinomas of the Urothelial Tract and Urachal Remnant

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)

+ Leucovorin
+ Cisplatin
Drug
Who is being recruted

Urogenital Diseases
+10

+ Urinary Bladder Diseases
+ Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Over 18 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: April 2003
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Last updated: January 13, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: April 23, 2003Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Determine the response rate and overall survival of patients with metastatic or unresectable adenocarcinoma of the urothelium or urachal remnant treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. Secondary * Determine the toxicity of this regimen in these patients. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to diagnosis (adenocarcinoma of the urothelium vs adenocarcinoma of the urachal remnant). Patients receive fluorouracil by vein (IV) continuously, leucovorin calcium IV once daily, and cisplatin IV once daily on days 1-5 and gemcitabine IV on days 1 and 5. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients are followed every 3-6 months. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 23-46 patients (7-18 with adenocarcinoma of the urachal remnant and 16-28 with adenocarcinoma of the urothelium) will be accrued for this study.

Official TitlePhase II Trial of 5-FU, Leucovorin, Gemcitabine, and Cisplatin for Adenocarcinomas of the Urothelial Tract and Urachal Remnant 
NCT00082706
Principal SponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Last updated: January 13, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
46 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, all participants receive the same treatment. Since there is only one group, there is no need for randomization or assignment to different arms. This type of study is often used to test a new treatment without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned randomly, like flipping a coin, to ensure fairness and reduce bias.

Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Urogenital Diseases
Urinary Bladder Diseases
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Urethral Diseases
Urethral Neoplasms
Urogenital Neoplasms
Urologic Diseases
Urologic Neoplasms
Female Urogenital Diseases
Male Urogenital Diseases
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Histologic proof of cancer originating from the urinary tract with adenocarcinoma as the predominant (\>/= 50%) histology. Dr. Czerniak and/or Dr. Tamboli will be consulted in equivocal cases of mixed histology. The Study Chairman is the final arbiter in questions of mixed histology. 2. Bi-dimensionally measurable disease. All patients must have measurable or evaluable disease. In general, liver and lung lesions should be at least 1 cm, and patients with node-only disease should have lesions of \>/= 1.5 cm in greatest dimension. Patients with disease confined to bone may be eligible if a measurable lytic defect, or soft-tissue component in present. Those without measurable disease may be eligible if a serum marker is elevated (\>/= 4 x ULN) (ie: CEA, CA-125, CA19-9, bhCG, etc). 3. (# 2 cont'd) The Study Chairman is the final arbiter in questions related to measurability. Patients with a three-dimensional mass or pelvic sidewall fixation on bladder examination under anesthesia are considered to have measurable disease. 4. Patients are eligible if they have evidence of metastatic disease, or if their tumor is surgically unresectable. In the absence of grossly metastatic disease, all patients should be seen and evaluated by a member of the Urology staff to assess their potential for resection. 5. Patients must have adequate physiologic reserves as evidenced by: • Life expectancy of at least 9 months (based on co-morbidity) \& at least 9 weeks based on the natural history of their cancer. • Zubrod Performance Status (PS) of \</= 2; or 3 if of recent onset and due entirely to the cancer and not to comorbidity, and especially if the compromised performance status is due to uncontrolled pain which is expected to be rapidly reversible when therapy starts. 6. (#5 cont'd) • Adequate bone marrow function as defined by absolute neutrophil count \>/= 1,800 and platelet count \>/= 150,000. Supranormal values judged to be of benign or inconsequential etiology are acceptable. • Transaminase (either SGPT or SGOT) \</= 2x the upper limit of normal. • Conjugated bilirubin \</= 2x the upper limit of normal. • Creatinine clearance (either measured or estimated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault) of \>/= 35 mL/min: CLcr = \[(140-age) • wt(kg)\]/\[72 •Creat (mg/dL)\] (For females, x 0.85) 7. Patients must sign an informed consent indicating that they are aware of the investigational nature of this study, in keeping with the policies of this hospital. 8. Patients must be at least 6 weeks out from pelvic irradiation, and must not have had more than 10% of the bone marrow irradiated. 9. Patients with a history of cardiac disease, or evidence of ischemic heart disease on EKG must have adequate cardiac function with an EF \>/= 40% to participate. 10. Patient must be at least 18 years of age to participate in this study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with metastases to the bladder from a primary adenocarcinoma arising outside the urinary tract are ineligible. 2. Overt psychosis or mental disability or otherwise incompetent to give informed consent. 3. A life threatening illness (unrelated to tumor) that would prevent completion of protocol therapy. 4. Pregnant or nursing women, as the drug therapy regimen, and support medications pose significant potential risks to the fetus and newborn. 5. Patients with second malignancies are eligible provided that the expected outcome from the second cancer is such that this will not interfere in the delivery of this therapy, or the assessment of response. 6. Patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases are not eligible.

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
One single intervention group 

is designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
5-FU continuous infusion over Days 1 - 5; Leucovorin once a day as a short infusion on Days 1 - 5; Cisplatin infusion over a few hours (usually 2-4 hours) once a day on Days 1 - 5; Gemcitabine infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1 \& 5 only.

Day: 1 - 5 Dose: 200 mg/m2 IVCI daily x 5 days

Day: 1 - 5 Dose:10 mg/m2 daily x 5 days

Day: 1 - 5 Dose: 20 mg/m2 daily x 5 days

Day: 1 \& 5 Dose: 200 mg/m2 (Two doses only)
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Complete Response: Participants counted as complete response if they have no radiological evidence of tumor, have no signs or symptoms of disease, and have normalized tumor markers (in those with initially elevated markers). Participants with an intact, tumor-containing bladder, must have a cystoscopy and exam under anesthesia to confirm a complete response. Partial response: Any response less than a complete response. Progressive disease: Progressive disease is at least 25% increase in tumor volume, or any new site of involvement, including the CNS. Increasing severity of symptoms, if judged by treating physician to be due to progressive disease, also counted as progression, even if these are not accompanied by an "objective" indicator. Any unequivocal increase (i.e. to greater than 5 mi.u./mL in beta-hCG) in a male patient taken to represent progressive disease, as will two consecutive rises amounting to a total of at least 125% of baseline for any other tumor marker.
Secondary Objectives

For each single arm trial, a stopping boundary also imposed to monitor toxicity of the new combination chemotherapy. Trial should be stopped for the 90% probability that the dose-limiting toxicity is greater than 40%. Participants monitored in groups of 3 sequentially. Stopping boundary obtained using a Bayesian monitoring rule.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 1 location
Suspended
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, United StatesSee the location
SuspendedOne Study Center