Suspended

Azithromycin in Combination With Chloroquine Versus Chloroquine in the Eradication of Asymptomatic Plasmodium Falciparum

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Azithromycin/Chloroquine

+ Chloroquine
Drug
Who is being recruted

Malaria, Falciparum

From 18 to 60 Years
+15 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: August 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorPfizer
Last updated: April 26, 2011
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: August 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

The purpose of this study is to determine if Azithromycin in combination with chloroquine is superior to chloroquine alone in eradicating P. falciparum asexual parasitemia in asymptomatic, semi-immune adults in Western Kenya. The trial was terminated prematurely 9 November 2004 due to the inability to recruit the planned number of subjects. There were no safety or efficacy concerns regarding the study in the decision to terminate the trial.

Official TitleA Phase II, Randomized, Comparative Trial Of Azithromycin In Combination With Chloroquine Versus Chloroquine In The Eradication Of Asymptomatic Plasmodium Falciparum Infection In Semi-Immune Adults 
Principal SponsorPfizer
Last updated: April 26, 2011
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
14 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Neither participants nor researchers know who is receiving which treatment. This is the most rigorous way to reduce bias, ensuring that expectations do not influence the results.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 60 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Malaria, Falciparum
Criteria
5 inclusion criteria required to participate
Healthy adult: male or female

Asymptomatic mono-infection with P. falciparum parasitemia with a parasite density of 1000 - 30,000 parasites/μL

Age 18 years to 60 years

Willingness to sign and ability to understand consent form


10 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
Mixed malaria infection by Giemsa smear

History of allergy to or hypersensitivity to chloroquine, Azithromycin or other macrolides (e.g. erythromycin, clarithromycin)

Any of the following: a.) Antimalarial therapy administered in the past 4 weeks, including quinine therapy or an artemisinin derivative; or b.) An antibacterial with known antimalarial activity (including, erythromycin, doxycycline, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole) within one week prior to enrollment into the study

Fever, history of fever in past 48 hours, or signs/symptoms of malaria (including acute or subacute headache, nausea, or vomiting)


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Study Objectives
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives


Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has no location dataSave this study to your profile to know when the location data is available. 

SuspendedNo study centers