Completed

Safety and Efficacy Study of Teduglutide in Subjects With Short Bowel Syndrome

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Placebo

+ Teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg/d
+ Teduglutide 0.1 mg/kg/d
Drug
Who is being recruted

Short Bowel Syndrome

Over 18 Years
+16 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Placebo-Controlled
Phase 3
Interventional
Study Start: May 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorShire
Last updated: June 9, 2021
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: May 25, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of teduglutide compared with placebo in subjects with parenteral nutrition (PN)-dependent short bowel syndrome (SBS). Teduglutide is an analog of glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2), a naturally occurring hormone that regulates the growth, proliferation, and maintenance of cells lining the gastrointestinal tract. Teduglutide has been shown in animal studies and previous human clinical trials to increase the size and number of these cells, thereby increasing the absorptive surface area of the intestines. The multicenter, double-blind, international Phase III trial will randomly assign approximately 80 patients to receive daily subcutaneous injections of 0.05 milligrams or 0.10 milligrams of teduglutide per kilogram of body weight, or a placebo. Dosing will continue for a period of six months. The primary endpoint in the study is a reduction in the use of intravenous feeding, which is often required to sustain life in patients with SBS.

Official TitleA Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Teduglutide in Subjects With Parenteral Nutrition-Dependent Short Bowel Syndrome 
Principal SponsorShire
Last updated: June 9, 2021
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
84 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a placebo-controlled study, some participants receive the experimental treatment, while others receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. This method helps to isolate the effect of the treatment from the psychological effects of receiving any treatment at all.

Other Options
Non-placebo-controlled
: No placebo is used. All participants receive the actual treatment or alternative interventions (often the Standard of Care), and comparisons are made between these treatments.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is being given. This helps reduce bias not just during the study, but also when the results are being evaluated.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Short Bowel Syndrome
Criteria
6 inclusion criteria required to participate
Men and women, aged 18 years of age or older at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF)

SBS as a result of major intestinal resection resulting in at least 12 months intravenous feeding

Body weight must be less than 90 kg

At baseline, subjects must require PN treatment to meet their caloric or electrolyte needs due to ongoing malabsorption at least 3 times weekly and to be on a stable PN regimen for 4 weeks before dosing


10 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
History of cancer or clinically significant lymphoproliferative disease with fewer than 5 years documented disease-free state

History of alcohol or drug abuse (within previous year)

Participation in a clinical study within 30 days prior to signing the ICF, or concurrent participation in any clinical study

Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities at the time of randomization


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
3 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

33.333% chance 

of being blinded to the placebo group

Treatment Groups
Group I
Placebo
Placebo injectable subcutaneously daily into the thigh or abdomen
Group II
Experimental
teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg/d
Group III
Experimental
teduglutide 0.1 mg/kg/d
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

The intensity of the response relied on a reduction from Baseline in weekly parenteral nutrition (PN) volume (minimum reduction of 20% and a maximum of 100%). Duration of the response incorporated responses at Weeks(Wk) 16-20 and at Wk20-24. Zero (0 - lowest) assigned if \<20% reduction at Wk20-24 and reduction at Wk16-20 of \< 20%, 20-39%, or \>=40%. One (1) assigned if reduction of 20-39% at Wk20-24 but \< 20% at Wk16-20. Two(2) assigned if reductions of 40-99% at Wk20-24 AND \<20% at Wk16-20 OR 20-39% at Wk20-24 AND 20-39% at Wk16-20. Three (3) assigned if reductions of 100% at Wk20-24 AND \<20% at Wk16-20 OR 40-99% at Wk20-24 AND 20-39% at Wk16-20 OR 20-39% at Wk20-24 AND \>=40% at Wk16-20. Four (4) assigned if reductions of 100% at Wk20-24 AND 20-39% at Wk16-20 OR 40-99% at Wk20-24 AND \>=40% at Wk16-20.
Secondary Objectives

An efficacy responder was defined as achieving at least a 20% reduction from Baseline to Week 20 and maintained at Week 24 in weekly actual PN infusion volume.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 32 locations
Suspended
Mayo Clinic ScottsdaleScottsdale, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Georgetown UniversityWashington, United States
Suspended
Emory University HospitalAtlanta, United States
Suspended
Northwestern Center for Clinical ResearchChicago, United States

Completed32 Study Centers