Completed

Temozolomide and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Brain Metastasis Secondary to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Temozolomide

+ Radiation therapy
Drug
Radiation
Who is being recruted

Lung Cancer

+ Metastatic Cancer
Over 18 Years
+43 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: December 2005

Summary

Principal SponsorEastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Last updated: June 29, 2023
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: December 20, 2005Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs such as temozolomide may make the tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. Combining temozolomide with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving temozolomide together with whole-brain radiation therapy works in treating patients with brain metastasis secondary to non-small cell lung cancer. OBJECTIVES: Primary * Determine the intracranial response rate in patients with brain metastasis secondary to non-small cell lung cancer treated with whole brain radiotherapy and temozolomide. Secondary * Determine the time to radiological progression in patients treated with this regimen. * Determine the time to neurological progression (confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) in patients treated with this regimen. * Determine the overall survival of patients treated with this regimen. * Determine the toxicity of this regimen in these patients. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients undergo whole brain radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks (10 fractions). Patients also receive concurrent oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-14. Beginning 3 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of neurologic (Central Nervous System, CNS) progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were followed every 3 months for 2 years. ACCRUAL: A total of 26 patients were accrued for this study.

Official TitleA Phase II Study of Temozolomide and Radiation Therapy in Patients With Brain Metastasis From Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) 
Principal SponsorEastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Last updated: June 29, 2023
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
26 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, all participants receive the same treatment. Since there is only one group, there is no need for randomization or assignment to different arms. This type of study is often used to test a new treatment without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned randomly, like flipping a coin, to ensure fairness and reduce bias.

Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Lung Cancer
Metastatic Cancer
Criteria
30 inclusion criteria required to participate
Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including the following histologies

Squamous cell carcinoma

Adenocarcinoma

Large cell carcinoma


13 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
HIV positive

AIDS-related illness

Poor medical risks due to active nonmalignant systemic disease

Frequent vomiting


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
One single intervention group 

is designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Temozolomide:administered orally. Radiation: whole brain radiation therapy
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Response was assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) by brain MRI in the 21 eligible and treated patients.Complete response (CR): complete disappearance of the clinically detectable malignant brain metastasis(es) being followed on MRI scan off corticosteroids and a stable or improving neurologic exam. Partial response (PR): greater than or equal to a 50% reduction in the sum of the product(s) of the maximal cross-sections on MRI scan with a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids and a stable or improving neurologic exam. Response = CR + PR
Secondary Objectives

1-year CNS progression free rate is the percentage of patients who had no CNS progression after being followed for 1 year . Progressive disease (CNS) was defined as a 25% or greater increase in the sum of the product(s) of the maximal cross-sections on MRI scan, reappearance of any lesion that has disappeared, development of any new lesion(s), stable disease with a deterioration of neurologic exam, or clear worsening of any evaluable disease.

Time to non-CNS progression was calculated from time of protocol entry to time of first systemic progressive disease or death. Patients alive and non-CNS progression-free at last follow-up were censored. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter (per RECIST criteria). Development of new lesions in non-CNS sites also constituted non-CNS progression. The 21 eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis.

Overall survival (months) was calculated from time of protocol entry to time of death from any cause. Patients alive at last follow-up were censored. The 21 eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has no location dataSave this study to your profile to know when the location data is available. 

CompletedNo study centers