Suspended

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Isoniazid (INH) in Preventing Tuberculosis Disease and Latent Tuberculosis Infection Among Infants With Perinatal Exposure to HIV

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Isoniazid (INH)

+ Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX)
+ Isoniazid Placebo (PL)
Drug
Who is being recruted

Actinomycetales Infections
+12

+ Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
+ Bacterial Infections
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Prevention Study

Placebo-Controlled
Phase 2 & 3
Interventional
Study Start: February 2004
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorInternational Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: February 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Tuberculosis (TB) and the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) are major public health problems in southern Africa, and the incidence of TB in South Africa is among the highest in the world. TB is caused by the highly contagious bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The use of Isoniazid (INH) prophylaxis in adults has been associated with reduced risk of TB disease in high-risk populations. Delay in initiating INH prophylaxis in children has resulted in more cases of childhood TB infection. This study evaluated the effectiveness of INH prophylaxis in preventing TB infection in infants born to HIV-infected mothers in southern Africa. Infants were randomly assigned to receive either INH or placebo by mouth daily, beginning between the 91st and 120th day of life, and at least 90 days after Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination. At sites in South Africa, HIV-infected infants received daily trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis until at least 1 year of age; HIV-uninfected infants received TMP/SMX until at least 6 months of age. The study was to follow participants for 192 weeks. Study visits occurred at study entry and every 12 weeks until week 192. A physical exam and blood collection occurred at each study visit. Infants were assessed for peripheral neuropathy every 12 weeks until week 96 and for TB at weeks 96, 144, and 192. The study also assessed medication adherence. As of November 12, 2008, follow-up was revised. All participants were permanently discontinued from study follow-up by February 28, 2009 and no later than May 31, 2009. Only clinical evaluations were performed for all participants. For HIV-infected participants, the study drug was stopped at the next scheduled visit. For HIV-uninfected subjects, the study drug was discontinued immediately.

Official TitleA Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Isoniazid (INH) in Preventing Tuberculosis Disease and Latent Tuberculosis Infection Among Infants With Perinatal Exposure to HIV 
NCT00080119
Principal SponsorInternational Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
1354 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Prevention Study
Prevention studies aim to stop a disease from developing. They often involve people at risk and test things like vaccines, lifestyle changes, or preventive medications.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a placebo-controlled study, some participants receive the experimental treatment, while others receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. This method helps to isolate the effect of the treatment from the psychological effects of receiving any treatment at all.

Other Options
Non-placebo-controlled
: No placebo is used. All participants receive the actual treatment or alternative interventions (often the Standard of Care), and comparisons are made between these treatments.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is being given. This helps reduce bias not just during the study, but also when the results are being evaluated.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Actinomycetales Infections
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Bacterial Infections
Infections
Lung Diseases
Lung Diseases, Fungal
Mycobacterium Infections
Mycoses
Pneumonia
Pneumonia, Pneumocystis
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Respiratory Tract Infections
Tuberculosis
Pneumocystis Infections
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Mother is HIV-infected. Hard copy documentation of the mother's HIV infection is unnecessary if a positive DNA PCR from her infant is available. * Received Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine up to and including the 30th day of life and at least 90 days prior to study entry * Able to complete all study requirements * Physician assessment of age-appropriate neurodevelopment in which the chronological age is corrected for gestational age for prematurely born infants * Parent or legal guardian able and willing to provide signed informed consent * Plan to live in the study area for at least 4 years * For inclusion in HIV-infected stratum, infant must have a positive HIV-1 DNA PCR; for inclusion in HIV-uninfected stratum, infant must have a negative HIV-1 DNA PCR performed at \>= 4 weeks of age Exclusion Criteria: * Previous diagnosis of TB infection, TB disease or current treatment for TB infection or TB disease * Previous receipt of INH * Contact with a known acid fast bacilli (AFB) sputum smear or culture-positive case of TB before study entry * Current acute or recurrent (3 or more prior episodes) lower respiratory tract disease * Chronic persistent diarrhea * Failure to thrive * Contraindications for use of INH or TMP/SMX * Require certain medications * Known or suspected immune system diseases other than HIV * Current or previous diagnosis of or treatment for cancer * Current immunosuppressive therapy greater than 1 mg/kg/day of prednisone or equivalent * Anticipated long-term oral or intravenous corticosteroid therapy (greater than 3 weeks). Those receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and inhaled corticosteroids are not excluded. * Grade 3 or greater AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, ANC, hemoglobin, platelet count, rash, neuropathy, or myopathy at screening * Any Grade 4 clinical or laboratory toxicity within 14 days prior to study entry * Other acute or chronic conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
4 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

50% chance 

of being blinded to the placebo group

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Perinatally exposed, HIV-uninfected (HIVneg) children receiving Isoniazid (INH)10-20 mg/kg orally once a day for 96 weeks + Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) 5 mg/kg of TMP component orally once a day until HIV status is confirmed and child is no longer at risk of acquiring HIV through breastfeeding

Antibiotic for the prevention and treatment of TB

Antibiotic for the prevention and treatment of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP)
Group II
Experimental
HIV-infected (HIVpos) children receiving Isoniazid (INH) 10-20 mg/kg orally once a day for 96 weeks + TMP/SMX 5 mg/kg of TMP component orally once a day until one year of age. TMP/SMX may have been continued after one year of age according to WHO guidelines.

Antibiotic for the prevention and treatment of TB

Antibiotic for the prevention and treatment of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP)
Group III
Placebo
Perinatally exposed, HIV-uninfected (HIVneg) children receiving Isoniazid placebo (PL) orally once a day for 96 weeks + TMP/SMX 5 mg/kg of TMP component orally once a day until HIV status is confirmed and child is no longer at risk of acquiring HIV through breastfeeding

Isoniazid placebo and TMP/SMX
Group IV
Placebo
HIV-infected (HIVpos) children receiving Isoniazid placebo (PL) orally once a day for 96 weeks + TMP/SMX 5 mg/kg of TMP component orally once a day until one year of age. TMP/SMX may have been continued after one year of age according to WHO guidelines.

Isoniazid placebo and TMP/SMX
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Criteria for diagnosis with TB disease: Definite-isolation of Mycobacterium TB (M.tb) or +ve stain on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); Probable- +ve acid fast bacilli (AFB) stain on fluids/tissues other than CSF and sufficient clinical criteria/radiographic evidence suggestive of TB; Possible-abnormal chest radiograph suggestive of pulmonary TB (PTB) and either a +ve tuberculin skin test (TST) or minimum score on algorithm for clinical TB. Records reviewed by Endpoint Review Group. Results report percent of participants reaching TB disease/death by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Criteria for diagnosis with TB infection were outlined in the protocol. TB infection included TB disease (see primary outcome measure 1 for definition) and latent TB infection. Latent TB infection was diagnosed by a positive tuberculin skin test (TST) based on a purified protein derivative (PPD) performed at week 96. Participant records were reviewed by an Endpoint Review Group to verify that participants had met the criteria for TB infection. Results report percent of participants reaching TB infection or death by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Secondary Objectives

Criteria for diagnosis with TB infection were outlined in the protocol. TB infection included TB disease (see primary outcome measure 1 for definition) and latent TB infection. Latent TB infection was diagnosed by a positive TST based on a PPD performed at week 96. Participant records were reviewed by an Endpoint Review Group to verify that participants had met the criteria for TB infection. Results report percent of participants reaching TB infection or death by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

HIV disease progression was defined as any advancement in Centers for Disease Control (CDC) disease category from entry or death. If a participant was CDC disease category C at entry progression was defined as death. Results report percent of participants with HIV progression or death by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Criteria for diagnosis with TB disease were: Definite-isolation of M.tb or positive stain on CSF; Probable-positive AFB stain on fluids/tissues other than CSF and sufficient clinical criteria/radiographic evidence suggestive of TB; Possible-abnormal chest radiograph suggestive of PTB and either a +ve TST or minimum score on algorithm to diagnose clinical TB. All records were reviewed by an Endpoint Review Group to verify that participants had met the criteria for TB disease. Results report percent of participants reaching TB disease/death by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Criteria for diagnosis with TB disease were: Definite-isolation of M.tb or positive stain on CSF; Probable-positive AFB stain on fluids/tissues other than CSF and sufficient clinical criteria/radiographic evidence suggestive of TB; Possible-abnormal chest radiograph suggestive of PTB and either a +ve TST or minimum score on algorithm to diagnose clinical TB. All records were reviewed by an Endpoint Review Group to verify that participants had met the criteria for TB disease. Results report percent of participants reaching TB disease/death by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Criteria for diagnosis with TB infection were outlined in the protocol. TB infection included TB disease (see primary outcome measure 1 for definition) and latent TB infection. Latent TB infection was diagnosed by a positive TST based on a PPD performed at week 96. Participant records were reviewed by an Endpoint Review Group to verify that participants had met the criteria for TB infection. Results report percent of participants reaching TB infection by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Deaths from any cause were included. Results report percent of participants dying by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Signs, symptoms and laboratory values were graded according to the Division of AIDS Adverse Event Grading System. Any event of grade 3 or higher not present at entry that occurred after randomization was classified as a new event. Results report percent of participants with a new event by week 96 calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 6 locations
Suspended
Princess Marina HospitalGaborone, BotswanaSee the location
Suspended
University of Cape Town, Red Cross Children's HospitalCape Town, South Africa
Suspended
University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg HospitalCape Town, South Africa
Suspended
Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, DurbanDurban, South Africa

Suspended6 Study Centers
;