Completed

A 1 Year, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Omalizumab in Children (6 - < 12 Years) With Moderate-severe, Persistent, Inadequately Controlled Allergic Asthma

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Omalizumab

+ Fluticasone
+ Placebo
Drug
Who is being recruted

Asthma
+6

+ Bronchial Diseases
+ Hypersensitivity
From 6 to 11 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Placebo-Controlled
Phase 3
Interventional
Study Start: April 2004
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorNovartis Pharmaceuticals
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: April 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This study was designed to provide one year efficacy and safety data for subcutaneous (SC) omalizumab, compared to placebo in children (6 to < 12 years) with moderate to severe persistent asthma who have inadequate asthma control despite treatment according to National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) step 3 or 4 (at least medium dose inhaled corticosteroids with or without other controller asthma medications).

Official TitleA 1 Year, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Omalizumab in Children (6 - < 12 Years) With Moderate-severe, Persistent, Inadequately Controlled Allergic Asthma 
NCT00079937
Principal SponsorNovartis Pharmaceuticals
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
628 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a placebo-controlled study, some participants receive the experimental treatment, while others receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. This method helps to isolate the effect of the treatment from the psychological effects of receiving any treatment at all.

Other Options
Non-placebo-controlled
: No placebo is used. All participants receive the actual treatment or alternative interventions (often the Standard of Care), and comparisons are made between these treatments.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers do not know which treatment is being given. This is the most complete way to prevent bias and keep the study as neutral as possible.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 6 to 11 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Asthma
Bronchial Diseases
Hypersensitivity
Hypersensitivity, Immediate
Immune System Diseases
Lung Diseases
Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Respiratory Hypersensitivity
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Parent or legal guardian was informed of the study procedures and medications and gave written informed consent. * Outpatient males and females aged 6 - \< 12 years on study entry, with body weight between 20 and 150 kg. * Total serum IgE level ≥ 30 to ≤ 1300 IU. * Diagnosis of allergic asthma ≥ 1 year duration, according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria, and a screening history consistent with clinical features of moderate or severe persistent asthma according to National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines. * Positive prick skin test to at least one perennial allergen, documented within the past 2 years or taken at Screening. A radioallergosorbent test (RAST) could have been performed for patients with a borderline skin prick test result after consultation with Novartis clinical personnel. * Patients with ≥ 12% increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) over starting value within 30 minutes of taking up to 4 puffs (4x100 µg) salbutamol (albuterol) or nebulized salbutamol up to 5 mg (or equivalent of alternative B2-agonist) documented within the past year, at screening, during the run-in period, or prior to randomization. Patients were not to take their long acting B2-agonist (LABA) medication within 12 hours of reversibility testing. * Clinical features of moderate or severe persistent asthma (at least step 3) despite therapy at step 3 or 4 (at least medium dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) - fluticasone dry-powder inhaler (DPI) ≥ 200 mg/day or equivalent with or without other controller medications). * Documented history of experiencing asthma exacerbations and demonstrated inadequate symptom control during the last 4 weeks of run-in despite receiving an equivalent dose of fluticasone DPI ≥ 200 mg/day total daily ex-valve dose. Exclusion criteria: * Patients who received systemic corticosteroids for reasons other than asthma, beta-adrenergic antagonists by any route, anticholinergics within 24 hours of Screening, methotrexate, gold salts, cyclosporin or troleandomycin, or had received desensitization therapy with less than 3 months of stable maintenance doses prior to Screening. * Patients with a history of food or drug related severe anaphylactoid or anaphylactic reaction, a history of allergy to antibiotics, with aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-related asthma (unless the NSAID could be avoided), with active lung disease or acute sinusitis/chest infection, elevated serum IgE levels for other reasons, presence/history of a clinically significant uncontrolled systemic disease, cancer, abnormal, electrocardiogram (ECG) in the previous month, or platelets ≤ 100 x 109/L or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities at Screening.

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
2 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

50% chance 

of being blinded to the placebo group

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Participants received omalizumab administered by subcutaneous injection every 2 or 4 weeks for a duration of 52 weeks. The omalizumab dose was based on the patient's body weight and total serum IgE level at Screening. The first 24 weeks of the treatment period was a fixed steroid phase where the steroid dose was maintained constant; in the following 28 weeks the steroid dose was adjustable, depending on the patient's condition. Following the 52-week treatment period, patients were followed up for an additional 16 weeks.

The omalizumab dose administered, based on the patient's body weight and total serum IgE level at Screening, and the number of injections and injection volume was determined from the dosing tables in the protocol. Omalizumab 75 to 375 mg was administered subcutaneous (SC) every 2 or 4 weeks depending on the dose.

Patients entered the study using their current formulation of any inhaled steroid (proprietary drug and device) ≥ 200 μg/day equivalent of fluticasone administered with a dry-powder inhaler.
Group II
Placebo
Placebo was administered by subcutaneous injection every 2 or 4 weeks depending on the dosing schedule in the protocol for a total of 52 weeks. The first 24 weeks of the treatment period was a fixed steroid phase where the steroid dose was maintained constant; in the following 28 weeks the steroid dose was adjustable, depending on the patient's condition. Following the 52-week treatment period, patients were followed up for an additional 16 weeks.

Placebo was administered subcutaneous (SC) every 2 or 4 weeks depending on the dosing schedule in the protocol.

Patients entered the study using their current formulation of any inhaled steroid (proprietary drug and device) ≥ 200 μg/day equivalent of fluticasone administered with a dry-powder inhaler.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

A clinically significant asthma exacerbation was defined as a worsening of asthma symptoms, as judged clinically by the investigator, requiring doubling of the baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose and/or treatment with systemic rescue corticosteroids for at least 3 days. The exacerbations rate per patient was derived using Poisson model adjusted by time at risk and the following covariates: country, exacerbation history, and dose schedule. A patient's person-days at risk was taken as the total amount of time (in days) he/she spent in the 24-week fixed-dose steroid treatment period.

See Adverse Events module for details.
Secondary Objectives

Nocturnal asthma symptom was measured daily on a scale of 0 to 4 in response to the question "How did you sleep last night?", with 0 as the best response and 4 as the worst response. The mean of the last 4 weeks of the 24-week fixed-dose steroid treatment period was calculated; for patients who discontinued prematurely, the mean of the last 28 days before discontinuation was calculated. A negative change in mean score indicated improvement.

A clinically significant asthma exacerbation was defined as a worsening of asthma symptoms, as judged clinically by the investigator, requiring doubling of the baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose and/or treatment with systemic rescue corticosteroids for at least 3 days. The exacerbations rate per patient was derived using Poisson model adjusted by time at risk and the following covariates: country, exacerbation history, and dose schedule. A patient's person-days at risk was taken as the total amount of time (in days) he/she spent in the 52-week treatment period.

Patients were instructed to record the number of puffs of rescue medication they took twice daily in a diary. The mean daily number of puffs during the last 4 weeks of the 24-week fixed-dose steroid treatment period was calculated; for patients who discontinued prematurely, the mean of the last 28 days before discontinuation was calculated. A negative change in mean daily number of puffs indicated reduced use of rescue medication.

PAQLQ measures functional problems that are most troublesome to children with asthma. PAQLQ has 23 questions in 3 domains (activity limitation=5, emotional function=8, symptoms=10). Patients responded to each question on a 7-point Likert scale. Overall PAQLQ score is mean of 23 questions; each domain score is mean of questions in that domain. Minimum possible value is 1 (maximum impairment); maximum possible value is 7 (no impairment). Positive change indicated improvement. The analysis included country, baseline PAQLQ value, and dosing schedule (2-weekly/4-weekly) as factors and covariates.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 56 locations
Suspended
Alabama Allergy and Asthma CenterBirmingham, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle Rock, United States
Suspended
Clinical Research CenterLittle Rock, United States
Suspended
Allergy and Asthma Specialists Medical GroupHuntington Beach, United States
Completed56 Study Centers