Completed

Study Evaluating Tigecycline vs Levofloxacin in Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

tigecycline

Drug
Who is being recruted

Community Acquired Pneumonia

+ Bacterial Pneumonia
+ Cross Infection
Over 18 Years
+6 Eligibility Criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 3
Interventional
Study Start: November 2003

Summary

Principal SponsorWyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Last updated: February 8, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: November 1, 2003Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

To compare the efficacy and safety of tigecycline with those of levofloxacin in the treatment of subjects with CAP requiring hospitalization. The co-primary efficacy endpoints in the study will be the clinical response in the clinically evaluable population and the clinical response in the clinical modified intent-to-treat population at the TOC visit. The primary efficacy analyses will first determine whether tigecycline is noninferior to levofloxacin. If tigecycline is found to be noninferior, the analyses will determine whether tigecycline is statistically better than levofloxacin.

Official TitleA Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Tigecycline Vs Levofloxacin To Treat Subjects Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia 
Principal SponsorWyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Last updated: February 8, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
430 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Neither participants nor researchers know who is receiving which treatment. This is the most rigorous way to reduce bias, ensuring that expectations do not influence the results.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Community Acquired Pneumonia
Bacterial Pneumonia
Cross Infection
Criteria
3 inclusion criteria required to participate
Male and female subjects ≥ 18 years of ag

Subjects hospitalized with CAP for whom IV antibiotic treatment is indicated

The presence of fever (within 24 hours prior to randomization), defined as oral temperature >38°C/100.4°F, axillary temperature \>38.1°C/100.6°F, tympanic temperature \>38.5°C/ 101.2°F, or a rectal/core temperature \>39°C/102.2°F OR hypothermia (within 24 hours prior to randomization), core temperature <35°C/95°

3 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
Any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude an evaluation of a response or make it unlikely that the contemplated course of therapy could be completed (eg, life expectancy <30 days)

Hospitalization within 14 days prior to the onset of symptoms

Residence in a long-term care facility or nursing home ≥14 days before the onset of symptoms


Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has no location dataSave this study to your profile to know when the location data is available. 

CompletedNo study centers