Completed

Peripheral Blood Mobilized Hematopoietic Precursor Cell Transplantation Followed by T Cell Add-Back for Hematological Malignancies - Effect of Peri-transplant Cyclosporine on Chimerism

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Device
Who is being recruted

Hematologic Diseases
+1

+ Neoplasms
+ Neoplasms by Site
From 2 to 80 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: January 2004
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: January 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Bone marrow stem cell transplant studies carried out by the National Heart Lung \& Blood Institute (NHLBI) Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) Unit have focused on approaches to optimize the stem cell and lymphocyte dose in order to improve transplant survival and increase the graft-versus-leukemia effect. The aim is to create the transplant conditions that permit rapid donor immune recovery without causing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by using reduced post-transplant immunosuppression in conjunction with a transplant depleted of T cells to a fixed low dose, below the threshold known to be associated with GVHD. We have found that the outcome from transplant is improved by controlling the stem cell (CD34+ cell) and T lymphocyte (CD3+ cell) dose. We use the "Nexell Isolex 300i" system to obtain high CD34+ doses depleted of lymphocytes to a fixed CD3+ T cell dose of 2 x 104/kg. The use of the cell separator and the monoclonal antibodies is covered by an Investigational Device Exemption. A persisting problem with these T cell depleted transplants has been the slow acquisition of full donor T cell engraftment (T cell chimerism). Two previous protocols have failed to increase the speed of donor T cell chimerism. Patients with mixed donor-recipient T cell populations are known to be at higher risk for late graft rejection and leukemic relapse after transplant. Therefore, the achievement of full donor chimerism remains an important therapeutic goal. In this study we will test whether cyclosporine given between day -6 and +21 after transplant can significantly improve day 30 T cell chimerism (the principle end-point). The study also will measure the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD, day 100 transplant related mortality, cytomegalovirus reactivation, relapse, and disease-free survival with appropriate safety stopping rules. This protocol follows closely previous studies in this series. Three additional modifications will be made however: 1) The first T cell add-back will be delayed until day 60 (instead of day 45) so as to continue to allow a 45 day period without cyclosporine immunosuppression. 2) No day 100 T cell add-back will be given. (In previous studies many patients have, for protocol-defined reasons, not received the second transfusion and there is no evidence that it is required). 3) Patients with high-risk leukemias with a high relapse probability will receive an additional chemotherapy agent prior to transplant using etoposide (VP16) 60mg/kg to improve the chance of remaining in remission.

Official TitlePeripheral Blood Mobilized Hematopoietic Precursor Cell Transplantation Followed by T Cell Add-Back for Hematological Malignancies - Effect of Peri-transplant Cyclosporine on Chimerism 
NCT00076778NCT00079391
Principal SponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
50 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, all participants receive the same treatment. Since there is only one group, there is no need for randomization or assignment to different arms. This type of study is often used to test a new treatment without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned randomly, like flipping a coin, to ensure fairness and reduce bias.

Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 2 to 80 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Hematologic Diseases
Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Hematologic Neoplasms
Criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA: RECIPIENT: * 1. Ages 10-55 years inclusive (but less than 56) * 2. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase * 3. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) categories 1. Adults in first remission with high-risk features 2. All second or subsequent remissions, primary induction failure, partially responding or untreated relapse * 4. Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) 1. AML in first remission Except AML with good risk karyotypes 2. All AML in second or subsequent remission, primary induction failure and resistant relapse * 5. Myelodysplastic syndromes categories 1. refractory anemia with transfusion dependence 2. refractory anemia with excess of blasts 3. transformation to acute leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia * 6. Myeloproliferative disorders in transformation to acute leukemia * 7. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia refractory to fludarabine treatment and with bulky progressive disease or with thrombocytopenia (less than or equal to 100,000 /micro L) or anemia (less than or equal to 10g/dl) not due to recent chemotherapy * 8. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma including Mantle cell lymphoma relapsing or refractory to current chemotherapy and monoclonal antibody treatment and unsuitable for autologous stem cell transplantation * 9. No major organ dysfunction precluding transplantation * 10. Diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) greater than or equal to 60% predicted * 11. Left ventricular ejection fraction: greater than or equal to 40% * 12. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 * 13. Able to give informed consent * 14. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age INCLUSION CRITERIA: DONOR * 1. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) 6/6 identical family donor * 2. Weight greater than or equal to 18 kg * 3. Age greater than or equal to 2 or less than or equal to 80 years old * 4. Fit to receive granulocyte colony -stimulating factor(G-CSF) and give peripheral blood stem cells (normal blood count, normotensive, no history of stroke) EXCLUSION CRITERIA: RECIPIENT * 1. Patient pregnant * 2. Age less than 10 years and 56 years or more * 3. Patients with CML in chronic phase who are 41 years or over in whom imatinib mesylate (STI-571)is the treatment of choice * 4. ECOG performance status of 2 or more * 5. Severe psychiatric illness * 6. Major anticipated illness or organ failure incompatible with survival from BMT * 7. DLCO less than 60% predicted * 8. Left ventricular ejection fraction: less than 40% * 9. Serum creatinine greater than 3mg/dl * 10. Serum bilirubin greater than 4 mg/dl * 11. HIV positive 12. Debilitation or age making the risk of intensive myeloablative therapy unacceptable EXCLUSION CRITERIA: DONOR * 1. Pregnant or lactating * 2. Donor unfit to receive G-CSF and undergo apheresis * 3. HIV positive * 4. Weight less than 18 kg * 5. Age less than 2 or greater than 80 years * 6. Severe psychiatric illness


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
One single intervention group 

is designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) using Nexell Isolex system

Manipulated Peripheral Blood Stem Cell graft on Day 0. Target CD34+ dose 6 x10e6/kg, (range 3 to 8x10e6/kg) CD3+ dose fixed to 2 x 10e4/kg.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

The proportion of patients who develop full donor CD3+ lymphocyte chimerism by day 30. Full chimerism is defined as \>95% donor alleles by molecular profiling (Short Tandem Repeat analysis).
Secondary Objectives

Kaplan Meier estimate of survival

Non relapse mortality: death without relapse Kaplan Meier estimate

Kaplan Meier-estimate of relapse incidence

Incidence of acute Graft versus host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV (before day 60 T cell add back) Modified "Glucksberg" grading

Incidence of acute GVHD grades II-IV (before and after T cell add back) Modified Glucksberg grading

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 1 location
Suspended
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville PikeBethesda, United StatesSee the location

CompletedOne Study Center
;