Completed

Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

irinotecan hydrochloride

+ oxaliplatin
+ leucovorin calcium
Drug
Biological
Who is being recruted

Adenocarcinoma of the Colon

+ Stage III Colon Cancer
From 18 to 99 Years
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 3
Interventional
Study Start: February 2004

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: May 13, 2020
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: February 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This randomized phase III trial was originally designed to compare three different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work. As of September 1, 2004, the study was expanded to a total of 6 arms (the original 3 arms (A, B, C) and 3 additional arms which were the same as the first 3 but with cetuximab) in treating patients who have undergone surgery for stage III colon cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan hydrochloride, fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with monoclonal antibody therapy and giving them after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells. It was not known at the time this study was developed which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective after surgery in treating colon cancer. This study had several key changes, based on the results of other phase III trials. As of 6/1/2005, patients no longer received irinotecan on this study and treatment arms B, C, E, and F were discontinued. Patients on arms B and C crossed to arm A. Patients on arms E and F crossed to arm D. Patients on arms C and F who had not gotten to irinotecan continued on arms A and D, respectively. As of 8/18/2008, pre-screening for Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) status was added with mutant KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) patients put on arm G and wild-type KRAS patients randomized between arm A and arm D. Patients on arm G were treated per physician discretion and followed for disease and survival status. KRAS was determined in a central laboratory and was process for all patients on this study. The primary endpoint of this study was modified on 8/18/2008 to focus on patients having wild-type KRAS tumors. All modifications were approved by the Central Institution Review Board, local Institutional Review Boards, NCI, and the NCCTG Data Safety Monitoring Board. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients) II. Disease-free Survival III. Overall Survival IV. Toxicity OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to positive lymph node involvement (1-3 vs 4 or more), histology (high \[poorly differentiated or undifferentiated\] vs low \[well to moderately differentiated\]), and clinical T stage (T1 or T2 vs T3 vs T4). Patients are randomized to 1 of 6 treatment arms (as of 6/1/2005, patients are randomized to treatment arms I and IV only; arms II, III, V, and VI are closed to accrual). As of 8/18/2008, pre-screening for KRAS status was added with mutant KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) patients put on arm G and wild-type KRAS patients randomized between arm A and arm D. ARM A: Patients receive oxaliplatin intravenously (IV) over 2 hours, leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours, and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46-48 hours on days 1. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM B (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm I for remainder of therapy): Patients receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV over 2 hours on day 1 and leucovorin calcium and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM C (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm I for remainder of therapy): Patients receive the same treatment as in arm A for 6 courses followed by the same treatment as in arm B for 6 courses (total of 12 courses). Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM D: Patients receive cetuximab\* IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM E (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm D for remainder of therapy): Patients receive cetuximab\* as in arm D and irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm B. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease. ARM F (closed to accrual as of 6/1/2005--currently enrolled patients may cross over to arm D for remainder of therapy): Patients receive cetuximab\* as in arm D and chemotherapy as in arm C. ARM G (added as of 8/18/2008, mutant KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) patients): Locally directed therapy. NOTE: \*Cetuximab is administered over 2 hours at a higher dose on day 1 of course 1 only. Quality of life (QOL) is assessed at baseline, 3 months, and at the end of therapy. As of 8/18/2008, QOL was discontinued. Patients are followed for a maximum of 8 years from randomization.

Official TitleA Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer 
Principal SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last updated: May 13, 2020
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
3397 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 99 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Adenocarcinoma of the Colon
Stage III Colon Cancer
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon * Stage III disease * No resected stage IV disease * No rectal cancer * Gross inferior (caudad) margin of the primary tumor must be ≥ 12 cm from the anal verge by rigid proctoscopy * Stage III tumor must have been completely resected within the past 56 days * Must have documented en bloc resection in patients with tumor adherence to adjacent structures * Tumor-related obstructions and colonic perforation are allowed * Tumor samples must be available * At least 1 pathologically confirmed positive lymph node * No evidence of residual involved lymph node disease * Synchronous primary colon cancer allowed * No distant metastatic disease * Performance status - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2 * Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3 * Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3 * Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL * Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN * No uncontrolled high blood pressure * No unstable angina * No symptomatic congestive heart failure * No myocardial infarction with the past 6 months * No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease * No symptomatic pulmonary fibrosis * No symptomatic interstitial pneumonitis * No prior allergic reaction (known sensitivity) to chimerized or murine monoclonal antibody therapy * No known allergy to platinum compounds * No documented presence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) * No active uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or systemic fungal infection * HIV negative * No clinically defined AIDS * Not pregnant or nursing * Negative pregnancy test * No men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception * No inadequately treated gastrointestinal bleeding * No ≥ grade 2 pre-existing peripheral sensory or motor neuropathy * No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or lobular carcinoma in situ in 1 breast * No other concurrent medical condition that would preclude study participation * No concurrent biologic therapy * No prior chemotherapy for colon cancer * No other concurrent chemotherapy * No prior radiotherapy for colon cancer * No concurrent targeted agents * No prior agents directed against epidermal growth factor-receptor * No other concurrent anticancer therapy


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
7 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental
Patients received oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours, leucovorin calcium IV over 2 hours, and fluorouracil IV continuously over 46-48 hours on days 1. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease.
Group II
Experimental
Patients received irinotecan IV over 2 hours on day 1 and leucovorin calcium and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease.
Group III
Experimental
Patients received the same treatment as in arm A for 6 courses followed by the same treatment as in arm B for 6 courses (total of 12 courses). Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease.
Group IV
Experimental
Patients received cetuximab IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm A. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease.
Group 5
Experimental
Patients received cetuximab as in arm D and irinotecan, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil as in arm B. Treatment repeated every 14 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or recurrent disease.
Group 6
Experimental
Patients received cetuximab as in arm D and chemotherapy as in arm C.
Group 7
Patients determined to have mutated KRAS (or KRAS not evaluable) were assigned to an event monitoring arm in which adjuvant therapy was determined and assigned by the treating oncologist. The determination of the type of therapy, duration of treatment, and dose modification was the responsibility of the treating oncologists.
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

The primary endpoint for this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.
Secondary Objectives

A secondary endpoint for this study was to investigate the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event free rates (percentage) are reported below for Wild-type KRAS Patients.

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event-free rates (percentage) are report below for mutant KRAS patients.

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 894 locations
Suspended
Northeast Alabama Regional Medical CenterAnniston, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Clearview Cancer InstituteHuntsville, United States
Suspended
Mobile Infirmary Medical CenterMobile, United States
Suspended
Providence HospitalMobile, United States

Completed894 Study Centers