Completed

The Use of Campath-1H, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus Followed by Sirolimus Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Patients

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Alemtuzumab

+ Sirolimus
+ Tacrolimus
Drug
Procedure
Who is being recruted

Urogenital Diseases
+3

+ Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
+ Kidney Diseases
From 18 to 65 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 1 & 2
Interventional
Study Start: November 2003
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: November 1, 2003Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Drugs that suppress the immune system, such as sirolimus and tacrolimus, have contributed to increased success of transplantation. However, to prevent organ rejection, transplant recipients need to take immunosuppressive drugs for the rest of their lives, and these drugs make patients more susceptible to infection, endangering their health and survival. Regimens that are less toxic to or can eventually be withdrawn from transplant recipients are needed. Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to and depletes excess T cells in the bone marrow of leukemia patients. This study will determine the effects of intravenous alemtuzumab and oral sirolimus and tacrolimus after kidney transplantation. The study will also evaluate this regimen's potential to allow eventual discontinuation of components of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. This study will last up to 4 years. Participants will undergo kidney transplantation on Day 0 and will receive intravenous doses of alemtuzumab, acetaminophen, and diphenhydramine on Days 0, 1, and 2, as well as methylprednisolone on Day 0. After transplant, patients will receive up to 10 days of valganciclovir or acyclovir. Participants will take tacrolimus daily by mouth for at least 60 days after transplant and sirolimus daily by mouth for at least 12 months after transplant. As part of opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis, participants will also take sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim by mouth 3 times a week, valganciclovir or acyclovir for up to 10 days post-transplant, and clotrimazole or nystatin by mouth for at least 3 months post-transplant. There will be a minimum of 62 study visits spread out over 4 years after transplant. Vital signs measurement, adverse event and OI reporting, medication history, physical exam, and blood collection will occur at selected visits. Sirolimus withdrawal will begin when a participant meets certain study criteria. The withdrawal process will occur over a minimum of 3 months at an approximate rate of 33% of the pre-withdrawal dose per month. Participants eligible for sirolimus withdrawal will undergo several kidney biopsies, including one 2 weeks prior to the start of withdrawal, 6 and 12 months after completion of withdrawal, 1 year after study enrollment, and annually thereafter.

Official TitleThe Use of Campath-1H, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus Followed by Sirolimus Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Patients 
NCT00585130NCT00078559
Principal SponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
10 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are assigned to groups based on specific criteria, such as their medical history or a doctor's recommendation. This approach ensures that treatments are given to those who may benefit the most, based on known factors.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned randomly, like flipping a coin, to ensure fairness and reduce bias.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the effectiveness of the treatment is controlled
In a non placebo-controlled study, no participants receive an inert substance (placebo) to compare outcomes. Instead, all participants receive either the experimental treatment or an alternative treatment (often the Standard of Care). This method allows researchers to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of a different active intervention, rather than a placebo.

Other Options
Placebo-Controlled
: A placebo is used to compare the effects of the experimental treatment with those of an inert substance, isolating the true treatment effect.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 18 to 65 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Urogenital Diseases
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Kidney Diseases
Urologic Diseases
Female Urogenital Diseases
Male Urogenital Diseases
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria * Kidney transplant with primary cadaveric or non-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-identical living donor kidney (0-3 HLA-antigen mismatch) * Receiving only a kidney and no other organs * Able to take medications by mouth * Willing to use acceptable methods of contraception Exclusion Criteria * Received HLA-identical living-donor kidney transplant * HLA-antigen mismatch greater than 3 * Panel reactive antibody (PRA) value greater than 10% at any time prior to enrollment * Received a non-heart-beating donor allograft * Received a kidney from a donor who is greater than 60 years of age * End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD) due to Focal Segmental Glomulerosclerosis (FSGS) * Previous kidney transplant * Received multiorgan transplant * Concomitant systemic corticosteroid therapy for other medical diseases * Known hypersensitivity to alemtuzumab, tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, or sirolimus * Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infected * Hepatitis C virus infected * Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen * Received dual or en-bloc pediatric kidneys * Anti-human Globulin (AHG) or T cell crossmatch positive * Investigational drug within 6 weeks of study entry * Known clinically significant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease * Previous or current history of cancer or lymphoma. Patients with adequately treated basal or squamous cell skin carcinoma are not excluded. * Clinically significant coagulopathy or a requirement for chronic anti-coagulation therapy precluding biopsy * Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-negative recipient, if received kidney is from a CMV-positive donor * History of a psychological illness or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study * Graves disease. Patients who have been previously adequately treated with radioiodine ablative therapy are not excluded. * Active systemic infections * Platelets less than 100,000 cells/mm\^3 at study entry * Pregnant or breastfeeding

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
One single intervention group 

is designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Experimental

30mg intravenous infusion on days 0 (transplant), 1, and 2

2mg/day orally within 24-48 hrs post-transplant, and adjusted to achieve blood levels of 8-12 ng/mL for 1 year

2mg orally twice daily, on days 1-60

Kidney transplant with primary cadaveric or non-HLA-identical living donor kidney (0-3 HLA-antigen mismatch)

250 mg intravenous infusion 60 minutes prior to first dose of alemtuzumab

650 mg may be given 30-60 minutes prior to start of each infusion of alemtuzumab to prevent infusion related side effects such as fever, skin rash and pruritis

25 mg may be given 30-60 minutes prior to start of each infusion of alemtuzumab to prevent infusion related side effects such as fever, skin rash and pruritis

1 double strength tablet 3 times a week from day 1 through 1 year post-transplant.

Given orally beginning on day 1 for up to 10 days post-transplant (until participant discharged from hospital if prior to 10 days). Dose adjusted based on participants calculated creatinine clearance

400 mg orally twice daily or 800 mg orally four times daily (dose adjusted based on calculated creatinine clearance and cytomegalovirus antibody serologic status of donor and recipient) for a minimum of 3 months starting when valganciclovir discontinued.

300 mg/6 mL inhalation therapy once monthly for a total of 6 treatments. First treatment given within one week post-transplant for participants with a known allergy or intolerance to sulfa

10 mg orally four times daily for a minimum of 3 months post-transplant (subjects take either clotrimazole or nystatin, not both)

500,000 units/5 mL orally four times daily for a minimum of 3 months post-transplant (subjects take either nystatin or clotrimazole, not both)
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Number of acute rejections\[1\] in all enrolled subjects from the time of transplantation to the end of the trial (four years post-transplant) 1. Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff\[2\] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine. 2. Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999
Secondary Objectives

Following sirolimus withdrawal, the number of acute rejections\[1\] in all enrolled participants 1\] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff\[2\] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine. \[2\] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999

Acute rejections\[1\] between initiation of sirolimus withdrawal and end of study 1\] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff\[2\] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine. \[2\] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999

Time (days) to acute rejection\[1\] for participants where sirolimus was not initiated 1\] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff\[2\] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine. \[2\] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999

Time (days) to acute rejection\[1\] for participants occurring during the year following transplantation 1\] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff\[2\] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine. \[2\] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999

Participants who died during the study, all cause(s)

Participants who experienced graft loss\[1\] during study \[1\]Graft loss is defined as the institution of chronic dialysis (at least 6 consecutive weeks, excluding participants with delayed graft function), transplant nephrectomy, or retransplantation

Participants who experienced severe acute rejections\[1\] during study 1. Severe acute rejection is defined as that which requires treatment with anti-lymphocyte antibody or is histologically evaluated as Type IIA or greater using the Banff 1997 criteria\[2\] 2. Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999

Participants who experienced acute rejection\[1\] during study which required anti-lymphocyte (OKT3, ATG) therapy 1\] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-prove rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff\[2\] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine. \[2\] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999

Side effects of conventional immunosuppression include increased body weight and hypertension

Mean change from transplantation to Month 48 in serum creatinine. Normal serum creatinine range is from 0.7 - 1.4 mg/dL. In a transplant population, starting serum creatinine is higher than normal range. A negative change indicates better renal function

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 1 location
Suspended
University of Wisconsin - Department of MedicineMadison, United StatesSee the location
CompletedOne Study Center