Completed

PREVAIL: PREvention of VTE After Acute Ischemic Stroke With LMWH Enoxaparin ( - VTE: Venous Thromboembolism - LMWH: Low Molecular Weight Heparin)

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Enoxaparin sodium

Drug
Who is being recruted

Acute Ischemic Stroke

Over 18 Years
How is the trial designed

Prevention Study

Phase 4
Interventional
Study Start: August 2003

Summary

Principal SponsorSanofi
Last updated: January 11, 2011
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: August 1, 2003Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Primary objective: * To demonstrate superiority of enoxaparin 40 mg sc qd in the prevention of VTE compared to UFH (unfractionated heparin) 5000 U sc q12 hours given for 10 ± 4 days following acute ischemic stroke. Secondary objectives: * To compare the incidence of VTE between the 2 treatment groups at 30, 60, and 90 days from the time of randomization * To compare neurologic outcomes between the 2 treatment groups, including incidence of stroke recurrence, rate of stroke progression, and patient functional status, during the 10 ± 4 days of treatment, and after 30, 60, and 90 days from the time of randomization * To evaluate the safety of using enoxaparin compared to UFH for VTE prevention in patients following acute ischemic stroke

Official TitleAn Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Following Acute Ischemic Stroke 
Principal SponsorSanofi
Last updated: January 11, 2011
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
Prevention Study
Prevention studies aim to stop a disease from developing. They often involve people at risk and test things like vaccines, lifestyle changes, or preventive medications.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Acute ischemic stroke, any territory, with an appropriate neuroradiologic study (head CT scan or brain MRI scan) providing results consistent with non hemorrhagic stroke * Onset of symptoms of qualifying stroke within 48 hours prior to randomization. In patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for the acute stroke, such as tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), administration of study drug may not start until at least 24 hours after completion of thrombolytic therapy * Significant motor impairment of the leg, as indicated by a NIHSS score ≥2 on item 6 * Inability to walk without assistance Exclusion criteria: * Females who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or of childbearing potential and not using medically acceptable and effective contraception * Clinical evidence of VTE at screening * Any evidence of active bleeding on the basis of clinical judgment * Prior history of intracranial hemorrhage (including that at screening) * Spinal or epidural analgesia or lumbar puncture within the preceding 24 hours * Thrombolytic therapy (e.g., tPA) or intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy within the preceding 24 hours.Thrombolytic therapy is permitted for treatment of the acute stroke but must have been completed 24 hours prior to randomization. * Comatose at screening (NIHSS score ≥2 on item 1a) * Known or suspected cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation * Confirmed malignancy that may pose an increased risk for bleeding or otherwise compromise follow-up or outcome assessment (e.g., lung cancer) * Impaired hemostasis, i.e., known or suspected coagulopathy (acquired or inherited); baseline platelet count \<100,000/mm3; aPTT 1.5 X the laboratory upper limit of normal; or international normalized ratio(INR) \>1.5 * Major surgery or recent major trauma within the previous 3 months * Anticipated need for full-dose treatment with therapeutic levels of an anticoagulant (LMWH, UFH, oral anticoagulant), e.g., for cardiogenic source of embolism or dissection * Treatment with a LMWH or UFH at prophylactic dose for more than 48 hours prior to randomization(patients receiving LMWH or UFH less than 48 hours prior to randomization may be randomized) * Allergy to heparin or enoxaparin sodium, or known hypersensitivity to heparin, enoxaparin, or pork products * History of heparin or enoxaparin induced thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia \[HIT\], heparin-associated thrombocytopenia \[HAT\], or heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome \[HITTS\]) * History of hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media and/or iodine * Bacterial endocarditis * Prosthetic heart valve * Known or suspected severe anemia (Hg \<10.0 g/dL) * Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (systolic blood pressure \[BP\] \>180 mmHg or diastolic BP \>100 mmHg) at the time of randomization or clinical hypertensive urgency * Any other clinically relevant serious diseases, including severe liver disease or renal failure \[creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min on at least two occasions\]. * Treatment with other investigational agents or devices within the previous 30 days, planned use of other investigational drugs or devices, or previous enrollment in this study.


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Study Objectives
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives


Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 15 locations
Suspended
Sanofi-AventisBridgewater, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Sanofi-AventisNorth Ryde, Australia
Suspended
Sanofi-AventisVienna, Austria
Suspended
Sanofi-AventisSao Paulo, Brazil

Completed15 Study Centers