Completed

Open Label, Phase II Dosing Study of Ara-C Chemotherapy in Combination With EL625 and Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

cenersen

+ Idarubicin
+ Cytarabine
Drug
Who is being recruted

Hematologic Diseases
+3

+ Leukemia
+ Leukemia, Myeloid
Over 18 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: April 2004
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorEleos, Inc.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: April 1, 2004Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This clinical trial is designed to assess the ability of cenersen sodium (EL625) in combination with Idarubicin alone or with Cytarabine to either: (1) induce remissions in patients who have previously failed to go into remission in response to chemotherapy; or (2) provide patents who have relapsed after going into a chemotherapy-induced remission with a longer remission. Cenersen sodium is one of a new class of drugs called antisense oligonucleotides (oligos). Oligos are designed to block the production of specific proteins and thereby inhibit their function. Cenersen sodium targets p53, a widely studied protein. In cancer, p53 occurs either in the un-mutated ("normal") or mutated forms. The majority of participants in this trial are expected to have un-mutated p53. Cenersen sodium is anticipated to sensitize cancers with un-mutated p53 to most established cancer therapeutics. p53 has a pivotal role in protecting the body from cells that have suffered genetic damage and, as a result, do not function properly. The protein first senses the level of the damage and then forces the damaged cell to respond to the damage either by repairing itself or committing suicide. In general, the greater the level of damage the more likely the cellular response will be suicide. Many cancer therapeutics, including both chemotherapy and radiation, cause the types of genetic damage that activate p53 and, consequently, cause either damage repair or cellular suicide. Laboratory studies suggest that cancer cells have a host of defenses that reduce the chances that these cells will respond to genetic damage by committing suicide. So compared to normal cells, cancer cells are more likely to repair the damage caused by cancer therapeutics while normal cells are more likely to commit suicide. Thus, blocking un-mutated p53 is more likely to prevent repair in cancer cells while preventing suicide in normal cells. This provides the basis for a differential effect of cenersen sodium on cancer cells verses normal cells. When p53-dependent repair is prevented in cancer cells they begin to copy their damaged genetic information in preparation for cell division. This copying of the genetic damage triggers a p53-independent backup suicide mechanism and, as a result, the cancer cells are eliminated. This is the presumed mechanism whereby cenersen sodium is able to sensitize cancer cells with normal p53 function to numerous cancer therapeutics. At higher doses however, chemotherapy sometimes blocks cells from copying their genes in preparation for division. Thus, it is possible that a chemotherapeutic agent used at a high dose could block any sensitizing effect that cenersen sodium might otherwise have on the cancer. The chemotherapeutic agent Idarubicin is known to produce the type of genetic damage that effects p53 expression, causes p53-dependent responses and has been shown to be made more effective at killing cancer cells by cenersen sodium. Cytarabine (Ara-C) is the most widely used chemotherapeutic agent for AML. Cenersen sodium does not appear to sensitize cancer cells to Cytarabine and at higher doses Cytarabine may reduce the capacity of cenersen sodium to sensitize cancer cells. Hence, this AML study will examine the effects of Cenersen sodium used in combination with Idarubicin and one of three different doses of Cytarabine (i.e. 0, 0.1 and 1.0 gm/m2/day), on the responsiveness of participants to these chemotherapeutic agents.

Official TitleOpen Label, Phase II Dosing Study of Ara-C Chemotherapy in Combination With EL625 and Idarubicin in Refractory and Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) 
NCT00074737
Principal SponsorEleos, Inc.
Last updated: January 18, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
53 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
In this study, all participants receive the same treatment. This approach is often used to evaluate the effects of a single intervention without comparing it to another.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Parallel assignment
: Participants are split into separate groups, each receiving a different treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Hematologic Diseases
Leukemia
Leukemia, Myeloid
Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria * Subjects with either refractory AML (not achieving a CR after a single course of induction), or relapsed AML that have a CR for less than one year. * greater or equal to 18 years old. * Life expectancy of more than 4 weeks following initiation of treatment. * Performance status (Zubrod) less or equal to 3. * Total Bilirubin less or equal to 1.5 x upper normal limit (UNL) unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia, and ALT(SGPT) less or equal to 2.5 x UNL. * Creatinine less or equal to 1.5 x UNL unless attributable to organ infiltration by leukemia. * If plasma creatinine value is borderline, creatinine clearance greater or equal to 60 ml/min (actual or calculated), serum magnesium should be within the normal value. * Subjects with liver and/or renal dysfunction due to organ infiltration by leukemia are eligible. * Left Ventricular Ejection Volume (LVEF) of \>50% as determined by multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram. * Able to comply with scheduled follow-up and with management of toxicity. * Sexually active patients must use an effective method of contraception during the study dosing period. The following are considered acceptable methods of contraception: (i) oral contraceptive pill, (ii) condom, (iii) diaphragm plus spermicide, (iv) patient or partner surgically sterile, (v) patient or partner more than 2 years post-menopausal or (vi) injectable or implantable agent/device. * Informed consent form obtained, signed and dated prior to initiation of treatment Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects with M3 AML. * Subjects receiving other anti-leukemia investigational agents (i.e., unapproved drugs). However, individual cases will be considered on a case-by-case basis for other investigational agents (e.g., antibiotics, antifungals). * Pregnant or lactating subjects. Chemotherapy (including hydroxyurea) within three (3) weeks prior to initiation of therapy, unless there is evidence of rapidly progressive disease; then subjects may be enrolled with a minimum of two (2) weeks from previous treatments. Prohibited Medications during the first week of each course: * Acetaminophen * Hi-Dose antioxidants (e.g., Vitamins C, E; Multivitamins)


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
3 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Active Comparator
cenersen, idarubicin, no cytarabine

cenersen with standard of care

standard of care for AML
Group II
Active Comparator
cenersen, idarubicin, HDAC (high dose cytarabine)

cenersen with standard of care

standard of care for AML

standard of care Ara-C and High dose Ara-C
Group III
Active Comparator
cenersen, idarubicin, standard dose cytarabine

cenersen with standard of care

standard of care for AML

standard of care Ara-C and High dose Ara-C
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

Cenersen plus standard of care
Secondary Objectives

Standard of care plus cenersen

Standard of care plus cenersen

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 6 locations
Suspended
University of California, San DiegoLa Jolla, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
University of Miami Health CenterMiami, United States
Suspended
Washington University Medical Center (Siteman Cancer Center)St. Louis, United States
Suspended
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteBuffalo, United States

Completed6 Study Centers
;