Completed
ILIADE

Phase II/III Study Evaluating the Effect of IL-2 on Preservation of the CD4 T-Lymphocytes After Interruption of Anti-Retroviral TX in HIV Infected Patients With CD4 T-Lymphocyte Count Greater Than 500 Cells/mm(3) Who Have Received Anti-Retroviral TX

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Interleukin 2

+ HAART
+ Treatment interruption
Drug
Who is being recruted

Blood-Borne Infections
+11

+ Urogenital Diseases
+ Genital Diseases
Over 18 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 2
Interventional
Study Start: October 2003
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: October 1, 2003Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

The use of antiretroviral (ARV) medications has greatly improved morbidity and mortality of HIV-infected patients but long-term use of these agents has been associated with significant toxicities and medication fatigue that can lead to problems with adherence and eventual development of virologic resistance. The spectrum of ARV toxicities is broad including the development of lipodystrophy syndrome with lipid abnormalities and glucose intolerance or diabetes, while increasing evidence suggests an increased risk of cardiovascular complications in ARV-treated HIV-infected individuals. Current PHHS treatment guidelines recommend deferring ARV treatment initiation in asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals with CD4 count greater than or equal to 350 cells/micro liter, and treatment initiation after the CD4 count is less than 350 cells/micro liter. Several patients who started antiretroviral therapy at higher CD4 counts (based on older treatment initiation guidelines) or have experienced significant immunologic reconstitution after ARV initiation, elect to interrupt antiretroviral therapy until their CD4 count reaches the level of current recommendations for therapy initiation (less than 350 cells/micro liter). Studies to date suggest that baseline and nadir CD4 count are the best predictors of a longer duration of treatment interruption that may be more beneficial with respect to reversal or delay of long-term ARV-associated toxicity and improved quality of life. It is known that intermittent cycles of IL-2 administration can lead to expansion of the CD4 pool and prolong survival of CD4 T cells. In this study the hypothesis tested is that IL-2 given prior to ARV treatment interruption could significantly prolong the period of ARV treatment interruption with preservation of CD4 counts above 350 cells/micro liter, and that this prolongation will be beneficial with respect to antiretroviral related toxicity and quality of life. The study will have two parts: during the first part (24 weeks) patients will be randomized 1:1 to either receive three cycles or IL-2 with their ARV therapy or ARV therapy alone. In the second part (week 24 to week 120), all participants will interrupt therapy and restart when CD4 is less than 350 cells/micro liter. The main comparison will be at week 72, when the proportion of patients from the two groups who remain off drugs and have a CD4 greater than 350 cells/micro liter will be compared. At regular intervals (every 24 weeks) lipodystrophy measurements and quality of life questionnaires will be evaluated.

Official TitlePhase II/III Study Evaluating the Effect of IL-2 on Preservation of the CD4 T-Lymphocytes After Interruption of Anti-Retroviral TX in HIV Infected Patients With CD4 T-Lymphocyte Count Greater Than 500 Cells/mm(3) Who Have Received Anti-Retroviral TX 
NCT00071890
Principal SponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Last updated: January 14, 2026
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
148 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Treatment Study
These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How treatments are given to participants
Participants are divided into different groups, each receiving a specific treatment at the same time. This helps researchers compare how well different treatments work against each other.

Other Ways to Assign Treatments
Single-group assignment
: Everyone gets the same treatment.

Cross-over assignment
: Participants switch between treatments during the study.

Factorial assignment
: Participants receive different combinations of treatments.

Sequential assignment
: Participants receive treatments one after another in a specific order, possibly based on individual responses.

Other assignment
: Treatment assignment does not follow a standard or predefined design.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Everyone involved in the study knows which treatment is being given. This is typically used when it's not possible or necessary to hide the treatment details from participants or researchers.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Double-blind
: Neither participants nor researchers know which treatment is given.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 18 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Blood-Borne Infections
Urogenital Diseases
Genital Diseases
Communicable Diseases
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
Immune System Diseases
Infections
Retroviridae Infections
RNA Virus Infections
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Virus Diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
HIV Infections
Lentivirus Infections
Criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: Age greater than or equal to 18 years. HIV-1 infection confirmed by ELISA and Western Blot before screening. Category A or B HIV-1 infection. Antiretroviral treatment: * started at least 12 months prior to screening visit; * stable and continuous for at least 12 weeks prior to screening visit; * modified no more than once for virologic failure. IL-2 naive CD-4(+) T-lymphocyte count greater than or equal to 500 cells/mm(3) in the twelve weeks prior to screening (historical) and at screening. Nadir CD4(+) T-lymphocyte count greater than or equal to 200 cells/mm(3) prior to screening visit (that is, no measurement whose values may be less than 200/mm(3) since diagnosis of the HIV infection. Plasma HIV RNA less than 50 copies/ml in the 12 weeks preceding screening (historical, less than limit of detection if different method and/or cut off used) and at screening. For women of child-bearing age: use of effective contraception (hormonal such as birth control pill or injections, intrauterine device, surgical sterilization and/or mechanical barrier methods such as diaphragm or condoms); for all participants agreement to fully comply with prevention of transmission recommendations during periods of viremia if sexually active (latex condoms with or without additional barrier methods). Desire to interrupt antiretroviral therapy. Ability to sign informed consent (no later than W-2). EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Previous treatment with IL-2. Combined treatment with interferon, other interleukins, anti-HIV vaccines, systemic (not topical or inhaled) corticosteroids and hydroxyurea within the previous 12 weeks. Diagnosis of AIDS. Acute infection in the 14 days preceding inclusion. Pregnant, lactating woman desiring conception or not using contraception. Hemoglobin less than 10 g/dl; neutrophils less than 1,000/mm(3); platelets less than 50,000/mm(3); creatinine greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (N); bilirubin greater than 3N; AST or ALT greater than 3 N. Progressive disease of malignant, psychiatric, cardiac, pulmonary, thyroid, renal or neurological (peripheral or central) origin or severe disorders of hemostasis. Severe uncontrolled hypertension. Previous or progressive pathology contraindicating the administration of IL-2. History of extensive psoriasis, Crohn's disease or auto-immune disease involving severe complications. HTLV-1 infection (ELISA positive). Hepatitis B virus co-infection treated with lamivudine or tenofovir or adefovir. Since atazanavir use can be associated with higher bilirubin levels (mostly indirect) in the absence of clinical consequences, subjects on atazanavir with bilirubin up to 4.5 times N may be allowed to participate if the levels have been stable and after approval by the PI or the PI designated covering physician.


Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives
2 intervention groups 

are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups
Group I
Active Comparator
HAART (standard of care) and three cycles of IL-2

Three cycles of IL-2 (6 MUI bid during 5 days = one cycle)

HAART from week 0 to week 24

HAART is interrupted from week 24 in both arms
Group II
Active Comparator
HAART alone

HAART from week 0 to week 24

HAART is interrupted from week 24 in both arms
Study Objectives
Primary Objectives

A failure of strategy is defined on the first occurrence of one of the following events: * CD4 T-lymphocyte count becomes \< 350 cells/mm3 between Wk0 and Wk72 (count confirmed by a 2nd measurement after 2-4 weeks * Planned interruption of therapy at Wk24 cannot be done for any reason; * Anti-retroviral treatment is restarted between Wk24 and Wk72 for any reason * Subject experiences clinical progression of HIV infection to a stage C AIDS diagnosis (appendix I) * Subject expires between Wk0 and Wk72 (whatever the cause of death) * Subject is lost to follow up
Secondary Objectives

AIDS defined events according to CDC classification

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 2 locations
Suspended
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville PikeBethesda, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Hospital Henri MondorCréteil, France

Completed2 Study Centers
;