Suspended

A Study of Two Methods of Determining When to Begin or Change Anti-HIV Treatment

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being collected

Data Collection

Who is being recruted

HIV Infections

Over 13 Years
How is the trial designed

Natural History

Observing the progression of a disease in untreated individuals in order to understand its typical course and outcomes.
Observational

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Last updated: June 24, 2005
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

PRIMARY: To compare the clinical efficacy of two decision making strategies for initiating or changing antiretroviral therapy: decision making based on current clinical practice alone (i.e., initiating or changing therapy based on CD4 count decline and/or clinical progression) versus decision making based on plasma HIV RNA quantitation in addition to current clinical practice. SECONDARY: To evaluate toxicity, biological markers, and patient management in the two arms. Although changing therapies is a common strategy in the treatment of HIV disease, guidelines are needed to help clinicians and patients decide when a change in antiretroviral therapy is indicated. The technology of measuring HIV RNA in plasma has been suggested as a tool for monitoring clinical drug efficacy. However, uncertainty remains about whether aggressive antiretroviral treatment to lower HIV RNA and maintain low levels for as long as possible will confer clinical benefit in comparison with management based on monitoring CD4 counts and HIV-related symptoms. Although changing therapies is a common strategy in the treatment of HIV disease, guidelines are needed to help clinicians and patients decide when a change in antiretroviral therapy is indicated. The technology of measuring HIV RNA in plasma has been suggested as a tool for monitoring clinical drug efficacy. However, uncertainty remains about whether aggressive antiretroviral treatment to lower HIV RNA and maintain low levels for as long as possible will confer clinical benefit in comparison with management based on monitoring CD4 counts and HIV-related symptoms. Patients are randomized to a decision making strategy for initiating or changing therapy based on current clinical practice alone vs. decision making based on plasma HIV RNA quantitation in addition to current clinical practice in patients with <= 300 CD4+ cells/mm3. All patients in the RNA arm as well as a subset (n = 183) of those in the CCP arm will have a plasma HIV RNA quantitation drawn every 4 months. The results of these quantitations will be blinded until the end of the study. CD4 counts will be obtained at least every 4 months if the previous count was > 20 cells/mm3. The remaining patients in the CCP arm will have CD4 counts obtained according to their clinicians' current clinical practices. Medications, clinical status, and changes in antiretroviral therapy will be recorded for all patients in the study. Patients are stratified by CD4+ cell count (<100 cells/mm3 \[200 patients\] vs. 100-300 cells/mm3 \[900 patients\]).

Official TitleA Randomized Study of the Clinical Effects of Initiating or Changing Antiretroviral Therapy Based on Plasma HIV RNA Quantitation Compared With Initiating or Changing Therapy Based on Current Clinical Practice Alone 
Principal SponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Last updated: June 24, 2005
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
1100 patients to be enrolledTotal number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.
Natural History
These studies observe how a disease progresses over time without active treatment. They help researchers understand how conditions typically develop, change, and impact quality of life.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
Over 13 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
HIV Infections
Criteria
No eligibility criteria are available at this time.Please check with the study contact for more details. 
Anonymus Profile Image
Ensure optimum compatibilityAdd your profile to know your probability eligibility score.


Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has 17 locations
Suspended
Community Consortium of San FranciscoSan Francisco, United StatesSee the location
Suspended
Denver CPCRA / Denver Public HlthDenver, United States
Suspended
Veterans Administration Med Ctr / Regional AIDS ProgramWashington, United States
Suspended
AIDS Research Consortium of AtlantaAtlanta, United States

Suspended17 Study Centers
A Study of Two Methods of Determining When to Begin or Change Anti-HIV Treatment | PatLynk