Completed

ACCORDIntensive vs Standard Glycemic, Blood Pressure, and Lipid Control in Type 2 Diabetes

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
Study Aim

This study aims to compare the effects of intensive versus standard control of blood sugar, blood pressure, and lipid levels in preventing the first occurrence of a major cardiovascular event, such as nonfatal heart attack, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

What is being tested

Anti-hyperglycemic Agents

+ Anti-hyperglycemic Agents

+ Anti-hypertensive Agents

Drug
Who is being recruted

Arterial Occlusive Diseases+16

+ Arteriosclerosis

+ Endocrine System Diseases

From 40 to 79 Years
+4 Eligibility Criteria
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Prevention Study

Placebo-ControlledPhase 3
Interventional
Study Start: September 1999
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Last updated: November 22, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Study start date: September 1, 1999

Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

BACKGROUND: Currently, about 17 million Americans have been diagnosed with diabetes and more than 90 percent of them have type 2 diabetes. The number of people with this form of diabetes, formerly known as adult onset or non-insulin dependent diabetes, is growing rapidly. By 2050, the number of Americans with diagnosed diabetes is projected to increase by 165 percent to 29 million, of whom 27 million will have the type 2 form. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in people with type 2 diabetes; these individuals die of CVD at rates two to four times higher than those who do not have diabetes. They also experience more nonfatal heart attacks and strokes. Type 2 diabetes is associated with older age and is more common in those who are overweight or obese and have a family history of diabetes. Women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy, adults with impaired glucose tolerance, people with a sedentary lifestyle, and members of a minority race/ethnicity are also at a greater risk for developing type 2 diabetes. African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, American Indians, and some Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are at particularly high risk for type 2 diabetes. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The three strategies tested in ACCORD included the following: (1) Blood sugar - ACCORD was designed to determine whether lowering blood glucose to a level closer to normal than called for in current guidelines reduces CVD risk. The study estimated effects on CVD of that level compared with a level that is usually targeted. (2) Blood pressure - many people with type 2 diabetes have high blood pressure. The blood pressure part of the trial was designed to determine the effects of lowering blood pressure in the context of good blood sugar control, that is to determine whether lowering blood pressure to normal (systolic pressure less than 120 mm Hg) will better reduce CVD risk, as compared to a usually-targeted level in current clinical practice (i.e., below the definition of hypertension; systolic pressure less than 140 mm Hg). (3) Blood Fats - Many people with diabetes have high levels of LDL ("bad") cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as low levels of HDL ("good") cholesterol. ACCORD participants who are selected for this part of the trial were assigned to an intervention to improve blood fat levels. This part of the study looked at the effects of lowering LDL cholesterol and blood triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol compared to an intervention that only lowers LDL cholesterol, all in the context of good blood sugar control. A drug from a class of drugs called "fibrates" was used to lower triglycerides and increase HDL cholesterol, whereas a drug from the class of drugs called "statins" was used to lower LDL cholesterol. All ACCORD participants received blood sugar treatment from the study. Based on the second trial (Blood Pressure or Lipid) they were assigned to, participants also received their high blood pressure or cholesterol care from the study. Study participants received all medication and treatments related to the study free of charge. Individuals who selected for and consented to participate in the ACCORD study continued to see their personal physician for all other health care. In summary, the ACCORD Study was a double 2x2 factorial design with factors consisting of: intensive versus standard glycemic control, intensive versus standard blood pressure control, and blinded fenofibrate or placebo in combination with simvastatin to maintain desirable LDL-C levels. All 10,251 participants were randomized to the glycemic interventions; a subgroup of 4,733 participants who met the blood pressure entry criteria were randomized to the blood pressure interventions in one 2x2 trial; and a distinct subgroup of 5,518 participants who met the lipid entry criteria were randomized to the lipid interventions in the second 2x2 trial. All participants had established type 2 diabetes and were recruited from 77 clinical centers in the United States (64 sites) and Canada (13 sites). On February 6, 2008, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) announced that participants in the intensive glycemia treatment would be transitioned to the ACCORD standard glycemic treatment approach due to higher mortality in the intensive treatment group terminating the experimental arm of the Glycemia Trial early. The Blood Pressure and Lipid trials continued as designed to their planned termination in 2009.

NCT00000620NCT00182910
Principal SponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Last updated: November 22, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details

10251 patients to be enrolled

Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.

Prevention Study

Prevention studies aim to stop a disease from developing. They often involve people at risk and test things like vaccines, lifestyle changes, or preventive medications.



Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria

Any sex

Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.

From 40 to 79 Years

Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.

Healthy volunteers not allowed

If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.

Conditions

Pathology

Arterial Occlusive DiseasesArteriosclerosisEndocrine System DiseasesHeart DiseasesHyperlipidemiasMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesVascular DiseasesMyocardial IschemiaGlucose Metabolism DisordersDyslipidemiasLipid Metabolism DisordersCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypercholesterolemiaHypertensionAtherosclerosis

Criteria

4 inclusion criteria required to participate
Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, as determined by the new American Diabetes Association guidelines, which include a fasting plasma glucose level greater than 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), or a 2-hour postload value in the oral glucose tolerance test of greater than 200 mg/dl, with confirmation by a retest

For participants aged 40 years or older, history of CVD (heart attack, stroke, history of coronary revascularization, history of peripheral or carotid revascularization, or demonstrated angina)

For participants aged 55 years or older, a history of CVD is not required, but participant must be considered to be at high risk for experiencing a CVD event due to existing CVD, subclinical disease, or 2+ CVD risk factors

HbA1c 7.5%-9% (if on more drugs) or 7.5%-11% (if on fewer drugs)

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives

6 intervention groups are designated in this study

16.667% chance of being blinded to the placebo group

Treatment Groups

Group I

Experimental
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels <6.0%.

Group II

Active Comparator
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.0 - 7.9%.

Group III

Experimental
Open label administration of anti-hypertensive agents to reduce and maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) level to &lt;120 mmHg.

Group IV

Active Comparator
Open label administration of multiple anti-hypertensive agents to maintain SBP level &lt;140 mm Hg.

Group 5

Experimental
Double blind administration of 160 mg/day of fenofibrate in participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in patients with eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.

Group 6

Placebo
Double blind administration of placebo matching either 160 mg/day in participants with eGFR ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in participants with eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.

Study Objectives

Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.

This study has 7 locations

Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation

Minneapolis, United StatesOpen Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation in Google Maps

Columbia University

New York, United States

Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, United States

Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, United States
Completed7 Study Centers