Platelet Drug Trial in Coronary Disease Progression
aspirin
+ dipyridamole
Cardiovascular Diseases+1
+ Coronary Disease
+ Heart Diseases
See all eligibility criteria
Prevention Study
See protocol details
Summary
To determine the effectiveness of the platelet inhibitor drugs dipyridamole and aspirin in reducing the angiographic progression of coronary artery disease over a five-year period and to test the predictive value of the platelet survival half-life in identifying patients with more rapid progression of coronary disease and development of its complications. BACKGROUND: Coronary atherosclerosis is the leading cause of death in this country and the developed countries of the world. Although modern coronary care units have resulted in a markedly decreased hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction, especially in those patients who enter the hospital early, its overall impact is limited since two-thirds of patients who die from coronary disease do not reach the hospital. When the trial was initiated in 1979, new approaches to the medical treatment of coronary disease and its complications were needed with an effort directed towards prevention of its progression and prevention of its complications through medical therapy. This prevention could save significant health care dollars over the long-term especially if the need for aortocoronary bypass graft surgery and the incidence of myocardial infarction could be reduced. Early identification of the patient at risk of developing coronary disease or of those with early coronary artery lesions would allow a greater impact of any successful intervention therapy. DESIGN NARRATIVE: Randomized, double-blind. The patients in the experimental group were treated with dipyridamole and aspirin for five years. Patients in the control group received a lactose placebo. The primary endpoint was angiographic evidence of progression of coronary artery disease and development of new coronary disease. Secondary endpoints included total mortality, cardiac mortality, mortality due to myocardial infarction, and incidence of new myocardial infarction. Recruitment ended in December 1982. The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the statement immediately above ("Recruitment ended in December 1982") and was confirmed from the Query/View/Report (QVR) System.
Protocol
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.
Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.
None (Single-arm trial): If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.
Neither participants nor researchers know who is receiving which treatment. This is the most rigorous way to reduce bias, ensuring that expectations do not influence the results.
Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.
Single-blind: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.
Triple-blind: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.
Quadruple-blind: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.
Eligibility
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.Conditions
Criteria
