Suspended

Clinical Trial of Continuous Low-Dose Hormone Replacement Therapy Combined With Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Alendronate

+ Estrogen/progestin therapy

Drug
Who is being recruted

Bone Diseases+3

+ Metabolic Diseases

+ Musculoskeletal Diseases

Over 60 Years
+27 Eligibility Criteria
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Phase 3
Interventional
Study Start: October 1999
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
Last updated: January 4, 2007
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Study start date: October 1, 1999

Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Clinical trials of estrogen/progestin replacement therapy (HRT) and a bisphosphonate, alendronate (ALN), have demonstrated that both are effective in causing gains in bone mass and preventing bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women. The FDA has approved both these drugs for prevention and treatment of fractures, and both are widely used in clinical practice. Because both are approved and effective, and they work by different mechanisms, many patients and their physicians ask whether both should be taken in combination, particularly in cases of severe disease. The question is asked frequently because of the high incidence of osteoporosis among women and the need for long-term prevention and treatments that often last decades. Indeed, physicians are using ALN and HRT together without adequate scientific support for the assumption that the combination is more effective than either given alone. Clinical trials are now underway to test conventional doses of HRT given as conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), 0.625 mg/day or its equivalent, combined with ALN, 10 mg/day. However, researchers are not studying the bone-sparing effectiveness of the combined administration of ALN and low-dose continuous HRT given as CEE, 0.3 mg/d, along with medroxyprogesterone, 2.5 mg/d (MP). This low-dose continuous HRT regimen is attractive because of better convenience, better patient tolerance, and reduced risk of breast cancer and other safety concerns associated with conventional higher doses. Further, we have recently demonstrated that the bone-sparing effect of this regimen is comparable to that of higher doses. The long-term objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the combined therapy shows a greater bone effect than does either treatment given alone. Our specific aim is to conduct a 3.5 year, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of low-dose, continuous HRT combined with alendronate, 10 mg/d (ALN), in three groups (72 people per group) of estrogen-deprived postmenopausal women over age 60. We will give Group 1 low-dose HRT, Group 2 ALN, and Group 3 both low-dose HRT and ALN. We will give calcium and vitamin D supplements to people in all three groups. The primary outcome measures will be spine bone mineral density (SpBMD) and total hip bone mineral density (HipBMD) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcome measures will be total body bone mineral content and forearm bone mineral content. In addition, we will perform studies to characterize the mechanism of the effects of these regimens. These studies will consist of measurements of urinary bone resorption markers, serum bone formation markers, calcium excretion, calcium absorption, and application of a model developed in our laboratory to estimate and compare the magnitudes of the anabolic effects (if any) of all three interventions on SpBMD and HipBMD. We have reported data showing that both agents have an anabolic effect on bone in humans, meaning that they cause an increase in bone mass beyond that explained by a remodeling transient brought about by reduction in bone remodeling rates. Further, research has shown that HRT and ALN affect bone by different mechanisms. Thus, this combination may have an additive effect on bone resulting in bone gain beyond that previously seen with other interventions. This project will provide much-needed information to physicians and their patients on the benefits and safety of this combination regimen so that they can make "evidence-based" decisions on the choice of interventions to prevent and treat osteoporosis.

NCT00000430
Principal SponsorNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
Last updated: January 4, 2007
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details

240 patients to be enrolled

Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.

Treatment Study

These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.


Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria

Female

Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.

Over 60 Years

Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.

Healthy volunteers allowed

If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.

Conditions

Pathology

Bone DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBone Diseases, MetabolicOsteoporosis

Criteria

6 inclusion criteria required to participate
Ability to give informed consent

Ability to live independently and travel to the research center for visits (we will provide transportation on a limited basis)

Good general health

Spine bone mineral density (BMD) (L1-4) T-score between -1.0 and -2.5, or a hip T-score between -1.0 and -2.5. A T-score of -1.0 is equal to a bone mass of one standard deviation below the mean peak bone mass in healthy young adult women

Show More Criteria

21 exclusion criteria prevent from participating
Abnormal transvaginal ultrasound that has not been investigated and cleared by endometrial biopsy

Active rheumatoid arthritis or collagen disease

Any corticosteroid therapy within the previous 6 months

Any history of cancer except the following: (a) superficial basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin which has been completely resected or resolved by a topical chemotherapeutic agent, and (b) other malignancies treated curatively at least 10 years previously, without any evidence of recurrence

Show More Criteria

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.

This study has 1 location

Creighton University Osteoporosis Research Center

Omaha, United StatesOpen Creighton University Osteoporosis Research Center in Google Maps
SuspendedOne Study Center