Hiatal Interrogation in Sleeve Gastrectomy (HIATUS):a Clinical Trial

The obesity epidemic continues to exist as nearly one third of the adult population in the United States is reported to be obese1. Bariatric surgery remains the most effective method of achieving long-term weight loss among obese individuals. The remarkable success of weight loss surgery in ameliorating obesity and its related comorbid conditions has been tempered by procedure specific side-effect profiles. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), a condition which develops when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome heartburn or regurgitation symptoms greater than twice a week is a known complication of bariatric surgery and remains a controversial topic among bariatric surgeons.2 The prevalence of GERD in the general Western population is between 10 and 20% 3, whereas the incidence of reflux among the obese population has been reported to be as high as 61%. 4 The safety and maintenance of native intestinal anatomy by the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has recently made this surgery the most popular operation for weight loss in America 5. The operation, which was originally described as the first stage of a biliopancreatic diversion - duodenal switch, consists of removing approximately 60% of the native stomach. Specifically, the bulbous greater curvature and a portion of the antrum is removed, leaving behind a long, thin banana shaped reservoir with a capacity between 100 and 150 mL. 6 This new stomach offers excellent weight loss and also minimal anatomic rearrangement when compared to the traditional gastric bypass. Although some authors have reported an improvement in GERD symptoms after SG many studies have demonstrated an increase in GERD symptoms9-14. Particularly concerning is the development of de-novo GERD symptoms after surgery, which has recently been reported to occur in up to 36% of patients when measured objectively.15 In some, GERD symptoms are severe enough, despite medication, that corrective operations are required. The need for further re-operative surgery carries along with it the risk for additional perioperative morbidity from gastrointestinal leaks or bleeding as well as further time off work and rehabilitation. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the development of GERD after SG. Some authors postulate that the new shape of the stomach, increased intra-gastric pressure, decrease in the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure or development of a hiatal hernia may lead to new or worsening GERD. The International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel recommend aggressively inspecting for and repairing an occult hiatal hernia to decrease the incidence of post-operative GERD.17 This call for "aggressive inspection" has led many surgeons to open the phrenoesophageal ligament and, in a sense, create a small hernia defect which is then sutured closed more tightly. Some believe aggressive interrogation of the hiatus may lead to disruption of the integrity of the sling fibers of Helvetius at the esophagogastric junction, thus contributing to the incidence of new or worsening post-operative GERD. Still, others propose that the main mechanism of GERD reduction is weight loss and not the re-creation of the extrinsic anti-reflux valve. Whether one should aggressively interrogate and subsequently repair the hiatus during a SG remains controversial. To our knowledge, there are no randomized studies to demonstrate superiority of either approach. The aim is to compare the rates of GERD (de-novo or worsening) in patients undergoing SG between one group receiving hiatal interrogation and repair and the other not having hiatal interrogation at all. Patient are randomized who either have a small hiatal hernia (<2cm) or do not have a hiatal hernia seen on preoperative testing to either hiatal interrogation with cruroplasty of the hiatus or no interrogation. By the end of the study, the study team will be able to provide a recommendation as to whether patients with no or a small hernia undergoing SG should routinely undergo simultaneous hiatal interrogation and repair with the goal of reducing the incidence of PPI de-novo GERD after surgery.