NonEndoscopy Assisted Probing Versus Simple Probing in Patients With Primary Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Endoscopy Assisted Probing procedure
Étude thérapeutique
Résumé
Date de début de l'étude : 20 juillet 2017
Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is the most common cause of epiphora in infancy that can occur in 5% of newborn infants. It may resolve spontaneously in 95% of patients during the first year of life.(1) After that time surgical intervention is justified. Epiphora after birth is most commonly secondary to a developmental anomaly of imperforated membrane (Hasner valve) in distal part of nasolacrimal duct. Patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) may show epiphora, eye discharge, acute dacryocystitis and cellulitis and dacryocele. Currently the management of primary CNLDO includes conservative treatment including lacrimal sac massage and topical antibiotics until 12 months of age. The standard intervention for non-complicated, unresolved cases is simple blind probing of nasolacrimal duct. The overall success rate of one time simple probing is 75%-95 %. Simple probing is performed through a blind passage of a malleable metallic probe through punctum to nasolacrimal duct and inferior meatal space in nasal cavity.Although effective, probing may be associated with traumatic nasal bleeding, nasal mucosal damage,punctal and canalicular injury and false passage. The trauma is further concerned during stent insertion.In the past decade improvement in endoscopic instruments and techniques enabled us to visualize and smoothly manipulate anomalies in the nasal cavity and especially in the inferior meatus. Endoscopic assisted probing has been proposed as a measure to increase accuracy, efficacy and safety of nasolacrimal probing. Furthermore, by this method intranasal pathologies associated with failure of probing could be accurately diagnosed and specifically treated. To the best of our knowledge literature addressing this issue is limited to few limited case series. The aim of this study is to compare results of endoscopy assisted nasolacrimal probing with the standard simple probing in cases with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction . Furthermore, investigators will identify associated anatomical anomalies. Investigators believe results of this study can be valuable in better understanding of this disease and provide a high evidence level necessary to propose a classification and management algorithm. Children with symptoms of unilateral or bilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, no past surgical management, with one or more of the below criteria will be included: 1. Non-resolving symptoms of epiphora and/or discharge. 2. Congenital dacryocele not resolved after 1 week of lacrimal sac massage, and topical antibiotics. 3. As soon as subsidence of acute dacryocystitis. Parents will be asked about symptoms and patients will undergo lacrimal tests before and after operation in one week, one month and 3months based on a special record form. Patients will be randomly assigned to "simple probing" group or "endoscopy assisted probing" group. All operations will be performed in operative theater and under general anesthesia. Pre- and post-operative examinations will be performed in plastic clinic in Farabi hospital.
Protocole
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.320 participants à inclure
Nombre total de participants que l'essai clinique vise à recruter.Traitement
Éligibilité
Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.Tout sexe
Le sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.Volontaires sains autorisés
Indique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.Critères
Plan de l'étude
Découvrez tous les traitements administrés dans cette étude, leur description détaillée et ce qu'ils impliquent.2 groupes d'intervention sont désignés dans cette étude
Cette étude ne comporte pas de groupe placebo.
Groupes de traitement
Groupe I
ExpérimentalGroupe II
Comparateur actifObjectifs de l'étude
Objectifs principaux
Objectifs secondaires
Centres d'étude
Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.Cette étude comporte 1 site