Terminé

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-Arm, Phase III Study of Oral GW572016 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Subjects Previously Untreated or Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

Paclitaxel

+ GW572016 (Lapatinib)
Médicament
Qui peut participer

Maladies du sein
+2

+ Néoplasmes du sein
+ Néoplasmes par site
À partir de 18 ans
Voir tous les critères d'éligibilité
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude thérapeutique

Groupe Placebo
Phase 3
Interventionnel
Date de début : janvier 2004
Voir le détail du protocole

Résumé

Sponsor principalGlaxoSmithKline
Dernière mise à jour : 13 janvier 2026
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 janvier 2004Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of an oral dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor (GW572016) in combination with paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel alone in first line advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Titre officielA Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-Arm, Phase III Study of Oral GW572016 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Subjects Previously Untreated or Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer 
NCT00085046NCT00075270
Sponsor principalGlaxoSmithKline
Dernière mise à jour : 13 janvier 2026
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
580 participants à inclureNombre total de participants que l'essai clinique vise à recruter.
Traitement
Cette étude teste un ou plusieurs traitements pour évaluer leur efficacité contre une maladie ou un problème de santé spécifique. L'objectif est de voir si un nouveau médicament ou une thérapie fonctionne mieux, ou provoque moins d'effets secondaires que les options existantes.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans cette étude clinique, les participants sont répartis de manière aléatoire, comme lors d'un tirage au sort. Cela garantit l'équité et réduit les biais, rendant les résultats plus fiables. En attribuant les participants au hasard, les chercheurs peuvent comparer les traitements sans influence extérieure.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition non aléatoire : basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.
Aucune (un seul groupe de participants) : tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement, aucune répartition n'est nécessaire.

Comment les traitements sont administrés aux participants
Les participants sont répartis en groupes distincts, chaque groupe recevant un traitement différent en même temps. Cela permet de comparer directement l'efficacité de plusieurs traitements.

Autres façons d'administrer les traitements
Groupe unique : tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement.
Affectation croisée : les participants passent d'un traitement à un autre au cours de l'étude.
Plan factoriel : les participants reçoivent des combinaisons de traitements pour évaluer leurs interactions.
Plan séquentiel : les traitements sont administrés successivement selon un ordre prédéterminé, pouvant varier selon la réaction du participant.
Autre type d'attribution : L'attribution des traitements ne suit pas de schéma standard ni de protocole prédéfini.

Comment l'efficacité du traitement est contrôlée
Un placebo est utilisé pour comparer les effets du traitement expérimental à ceux d’une substance inactive, ce qui permet d’évaluer son efficacité réelle.

Autres options possibles
Non contrôlée par placebo : aucun placebo n'est utilisé. Tous les participants reçoivent un traitement actif, souvent le traitement standard, pour permettre une comparaison directe.

Comment la nature du traitement est tenue confidentielle
Dans une étude en double aveugle, ni les participants ni les chercheurs ne savent quel traitement est administré. C'est la méthode la plus rigoureuse pour éviter tout biais lié aux attentes et garantir des résultats fiables.

Autres méthodes de masquage
En ouvert : tout le monde connaît le traitement administré.
Simple aveugle : les participants ignorent le traitement reçu, mais les chercheurs le connaissent.
Triple aveugle : Les participants, les chercheurs et les personnes qui analysent les résultats ne savent pas quel traitement est administré.
Quadruple aveugle : Les participants, les chercheurs, les personnes qui analysent les résultats et les professionnels de santé en charge du suivi ne savent pas non plus quel traitement est administré.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
FemmeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
À partir de 18 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Maladies du sein
Néoplasmes du sein
Néoplasmes par site
Néoplasmes
Maladies de la peau
Critères

Inclusion criteria: * Signed Informed Consent * Able to swallow an oral medication * Cardiac ejection fraction within the institutional range of normal as measured by echocardiogram * Adequate kidney and liver function * Adequate bone marrow function * Tumor tissue available for testing * Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy is permitted with an anthracycline or anthracenedione-containing regimen however, subjects must have had cumulative doses of less than 360 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, 720 mg/m2 of epirubicin, or 72 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone * No Her2/neu overexpression in tumor tissue tested or status unknown if tissue has never been tested Exclusion criteria: * Prior treatment regimens for advanced or metastatic breast cancer. * Pregnant or lactating * Conditions that would effect the absorption of an oral drug * Active infection * Brain metastases * Treatment with EGFR (Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor) inhibitor. * Known hypersensitivity to Taxol or excipients of Taxol * Peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2 or greater is not permitted * Severe Cardiovascular disease or cardiac disease requiring a device. * Serious medical or psychiatric disorder that would interfere with the patient's safety or informed consent.

Plan de l'étude

Découvrez tous les traitements administrés dans cette étude, leur description détaillée et ce qu'ils impliquent.
Groupes de traitement
Objectifs de l'étude
2 groupes d'intervention 

sont désignés dans cette étude

50% de chances 

d'être dans le groupe placebo en aveugle

Groupes de traitement
Groupe I
Expérimental
Lapatinib 1500 mg, once daily and Paclitaxel 175 mg/m Intravenously over 3 hours ever 3 weeks

Active Comparator

Oral GW572016 Lapatinib
Groupe II
Placebo
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m Intravenously over 3 hours ever 3 weeks and Placebo

Active Comparator
Objectifs de l'étude
Objectifs principaux

Time to progression (TTP) is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of progression of disease (PD) or death due to breast cancer. The investigator assessed PD based on radiological PD (imaging data) and clinical symptomatic progress (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] Criteria: target lesion (TL), at least a 20% increase in the sum of largest diameter (LD) of TLs or the appearance of one or more new lesions; non-TL (NTL), the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs). TTP was assessed in participants who died due to breast cancer or progressed, as assessed by the investigator, as well as in those who were censored and completed follow-up and those who were censored but are still being followed. For censored participants (those without a documented date of disease progression/death due to breast cancer), the date of the last radiographic assessment was used.

Time to progression is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of progression of disease (PD) or death due to breast cancer. The IRC assessed PD based on radiological PD (imaging data) and clinical symptomatic progress (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] Criteria: target lesion (TL), at least a 20% increase in the sum of largest diameter (LD) of TLs or the appearance of one or more new lesions; non-TL (NTL), the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs). TTP was assessed in participants who died due to breast cancer or progressed, as assessed by the independent reviewer, as well as in those who were censored and completed follow-up and those who were censored but are still being followed. For censored participants (those without a documented date of disease progression/death due to breast cancer), the date of the last radiographic assessment was used.
Objectifs secondaires

The percentage of participants with tumor response is defined as those participants with measurable disease who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was used to evaluate the measurability of tumor lesions, to determine target lesion (TLs) and non-target lesion (NTLs). CR (TLs and NTLs): the disappearance of all TLs and NTLs; PR (for TLs): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter (LD) of TLs, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; PR (for NTLs): persistence of one or more lesions.

The percentage of participants with tumor response is defined as those participants with measurable disease who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The RECIST criteria was used to evaluate the measurability of tumor lesions, to determine target lesion (TLs) and non-target lesion (NTLs). CR (TLs and NTLs): the disappearance of all TLs and NTLs; PR (for TLs): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter (LD) of TLs, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; PR (for NTLs): persistence of one or more lesions.

Percentage of participants. with CB is defined as the percentage of participants with evidence of CR (disappearance of all TLs and NTLs), PR (TLs: a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the LD, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; NTLs: persistence of \>=1 lesion), or stable disease (neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD) for \>=6 months based on RECIST criteria. PD for TL: a \>=20% increase in the sum of the LD of TLs or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion. PD for NTLs: the appearance of \>=1 new lesion and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.

Time to response (TTR) is defined as the time from randomization until the first documented evidence of CR (disappearance of all TLs and NTLs) or PR (for TLs: a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the LD of TLs, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; for NTLs: the persistence of \>=1 lesion) (whichever status was recorded first). TTR data are displayed as the number of participants achieving a CR or PR by the indicated week. The investigator evaluated the TTR, and the analysis was based on responses confirmed at a repeat assessment, with the TTR taken as the first time the response was observed.

The investigator evaluated the DOR for the subset of participants who showed a CR (disappearance of all TLs and NTLs) or PR (TLs: a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the LD of TLs, taking as a reference the Baseline sum LD; NTLs: persistence of \>=1 lesion). DOR is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of PR or CR until the first documented sign of PD (TL: a \>=20% increase in the sum of the LD of TLs or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion; NTL: the appearance of \>=1 new lesion and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs) or death due to breast cancer, if sooner.

PFS is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of progression disease (PD) or death due to any cause, if sooner. For TLs, progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of TLs or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For NTLs, progressive disease is defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. par., participants.

The severity of adverse events was graded per the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3. Grades 1 through 5 have unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on the following general guideline: Grade 1, Mild AE; Grade 2, Moderate AE; Grade 3, Severe AE; Grade 4, Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5, death related to AE.

PFS is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. Six months PFS is defined as PFS at six months from the time of randomization. Raw data for 6 months PFS are not available; thus, data are presented as the number of participants who progressed or died at or prior to 6 months. For TLs, progressive disease is defined asat least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of TLs or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For NTLs, progressive disease is defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. PFS was assessed in participants who died or progressed, as well as in those who were censored and completed follow-up and those who were censored but are still being followed. For censored participants (those without a documented date of disease progression/death due to breast cancer), the date of the last radiographic assessment was used.

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause.

The FACT-B questionnaire was designed to measure multidimensional quality of life (QOL) in participants with breast cancer. The physical and functional well-being subscale scores range from 0 to 28, based on 7 questions (each scored from 0 \[not at all\] to 4 \[very much\] for all subscales); the emotional and social/family well-being (1 question optional) subscale scores range from 0 to 24 (based on 6 questions), and the additional concerns subscale score ranges from 0 to 40, based on 10 questions. The FACT-B Total Score (0 \[better QOL\] to 144 \[worse QOL\]) is the sum of the subscale scores.

The FACT-G questionnaire was designed to measure multidimensional QOL in participants with cancer and includes subscales for physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The physical, social/family, and functional well-being subscale scores range from 0 to 28, based on responses to 7 questions (each question scored from 0 \[not at all\] to 4 \[very much\]); the emotional well-being subscale score ranges from 0 to 24, based on responses to 6 questions. The FACT-G Total Score (ranging from 0 \[better QOL\] to 108 \[worse QOL\]) is the sum of the subscale scores.

The TOI questionnaire was designed to measure multidimensional QOL in participants with cancer and includes subscales for physical, functional well-being, and additional cancer concerns. The physical and functional well-being subscale scores range from 0 to 28, based on 7 questions (each question scored from 0 \[not at all\] to 4 \[very much\]); the breast cancer unweighted subscale scores range from 0 to 36, based on 9 questions. The total TOI score (ranging from 0 \[better QOL\] to 92 \[worse QOL\]) is the sum of the TOI subscale scores.

The Press Laboratory collected tumor tissues of participants for ErbB2 testing. ErbB2 testing is done to detect breast cancer and predict its likely outcome. All samples were analyzed by the Press Laboratory. Participants were categorized as ErbB2 positive (overexpression of the ErbB2 gene), ErbB2 negative, and assay not done (which included participants with no available samples and those with inconclusive results). ErbB2 status is determined by immunohistochemistry (ICH) assay and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing. Negative ErbB2 status is defined as 0 or 1+ by IHC, or as 2+ by IHC and FISH.

The Press Laboratory collected tumor tissues of participants for biomarker testing. All samples were analyzed by the Press Laboratory. The ratio of ErbB2 gene signals to chromosome 17 signals, which indicates the progression of breast cancer, was calculated. Low levels of amplification (few copies) may have a ratio of 2-5, whereas high levels of amplification may have a ratio \>10.

The Press Laboratory tested tumor tissue samples (taken at Screening, prior to randomization to study treatment) to determine intra-tumoral expression levels of ErbB1, ErbB2, and other analytes associated with these pathways by IHC, the process of detecting antigens (e.g., proteins) in cells of a tissue section. The IHC assessment is expressed as: 0, no staining (no cancer cells); 1+, faint staining; 2+, weak to moderate complete staining; 3+, strong complete staining (many cancer cells). A status of "Assay not done" was assigned to participants with no available samples and to those with inconclusive results. If strong staining is observed, breast cancer that has high levels of HER2 expression (overexpression) is indicated. If moderate/weak staining is observed (IHC=2+), breast cancer that has low/moderate expression levels is indicated. When no staining is observed (IHC=0), breast cancer HER2 expression may be below the level of detection of the assay.

The Press Laboratory tested participants who were 2+ (weak to moderate complete staining) or 3+ (strong complete staining) for ErbB2 overexpression by IHC for ErbB2 gene amplification using the FISH assay. The results of the FISH assay can be ErbB2 gene "amplification" (increased number of copies of the ErbB2 gene) or "non-amplification" (not many copies of the ErbB2 gene). A status of "Assay not done" was assigned to those participants with no available samples and to those with inconclusive results (e.g., due to hybridization or staining problems).

The Quest Laboratory collected blood samples for quantitative determination of serum ErbB1. The results of serum monitoring were used to compare tumor response rates following randomized therapy.

The Quest Laboratory collected blood samples for quantitative determination of serum ErbB2. The results of serum monitoring were used to compare tumor response rates following randomized therapy.

Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude comporte 177 sites
Suspendu
GSK Investigational SiteTucson, United StatesVoir le site
Suspendu
GSK Investigational SiteHot Springs, United States
Suspendu
GSK Investigational SiteJonesboro, United States
Suspendu
GSK Investigational SiteFountain Valley, United States
Terminé177 Centres d'Étude