Terminé
ACCORD

Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

Anti-hyperglycemic Agents

+ Anti-hypertensive Agents
+ Blinded fenofibrate or placebo plus simvastatin
Médicament
Qui peut participer

Atherosclerosis
+4

+ Cardiovascular Diseases
+ Hypercholesterolemia
De 40 à 79 ans
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude de prévention

Groupe Placebo
Phase 3
Interventionnel
Date de début : septembre 1999

Résumé

Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 22 novembre 2016
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 septembre 1999Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

The purpose of this study is to prevent major cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, or cardiovascular death) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus using intensive glycemic control, intensive blood pressure control, and multiple lipid management. BACKGROUND: Currently, about 17 million Americans have been diagnosed with diabetes and more than 90 percent of them have type 2 diabetes. The number of people with this form of diabetes, formerly known as adult onset or non-insulin dependent diabetes, is growing rapidly. By 2050, the number of Americans with diagnosed diabetes is projected to increase by 165 percent to 29 million, of whom 27 million will have the type 2 form. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in people with type 2 diabetes; these individuals die of CVD at rates two to four times higher than those who do not have diabetes. They also experience more nonfatal heart attacks and strokes. Type 2 diabetes is associated with older age and is more common in those who are overweight or obese and have a family history of diabetes. Women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy, adults with impaired glucose tolerance, people with a sedentary lifestyle, and members of a minority race/ethnicity are also at a greater risk for developing type 2 diabetes. African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, American Indians, and some Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are at particularly high risk for type 2 diabetes. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The three strategies tested in ACCORD included the following: (1) Blood sugar - ACCORD was designed to determine whether lowering blood glucose to a level closer to normal than called for in current guidelines reduces CVD risk. The study estimated effects on CVD of that level compared with a level that is usually targeted. (2) Blood pressure - many people with type 2 diabetes have high blood pressure. The blood pressure part of the trial was designed to determine the effects of lowering blood pressure in the context of good blood sugar control, that is to determine whether lowering blood pressure to normal (systolic pressure less than 120 mm Hg) will better reduce CVD risk, as compared to a usually-targeted level in current clinical practice (i.e., below the definition of hypertension; systolic pressure less than 140 mm Hg). (3) Blood Fats - Many people with diabetes have high levels of LDL ("bad") cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as low levels of HDL ("good") cholesterol. ACCORD participants who are selected for this part of the trial were assigned to an intervention to improve blood fat levels. This part of the study looked at the effects of lowering LDL cholesterol and blood triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol compared to an intervention that only lowers LDL cholesterol, all in the context of good blood sugar control. A drug from a class of drugs called "fibrates" was used to lower triglycerides and increase HDL cholesterol, whereas a drug from the class of drugs called "statins" was used to lower LDL cholesterol. All ACCORD participants received blood sugar treatment from the study. Based on the second trial (Blood Pressure or Lipid) they were assigned to, participants also received their high blood pressure or cholesterol care from the study. Study participants received all medication and treatments related to the study free of charge. Individuals who selected for and consented to participate in the ACCORD study continued to see their personal physician for all other health care. In summary, the ACCORD Study was a double 2x2 factorial design with factors consisting of: intensive versus standard glycemic control, intensive versus standard blood pressure control, and blinded fenofibrate or placebo in combination with simvastatin to maintain desirable LDL-C levels. All 10,251 participants were randomized to the glycemic interventions; a subgroup of 4,733 participants who met the blood pressure entry criteria were randomized to the blood pressure interventions in one 2x2 trial; and a distinct subgroup of 5,518 participants who met the lipid entry criteria were randomized to the lipid interventions in the second 2x2 trial. All participants had established type 2 diabetes and were recruited from 77 clinical centers in the United States (64 sites) and Canada (13 sites). On February 6, 2008, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) announced that participants in the intensive glycemia treatment would be transitioned to the ACCORD standard glycemic treatment approach due to higher mortality in the intensive treatment group terminating the experimental arm of the Glycemia Trial early. The Blood Pressure and Lipid trials continued as designed to their planned termination in 2009.

Titre officielAction to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) 
Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 22 novembre 2016
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
10251 participants à inclureNombre total de participants que l'essai clinique vise à recruter.
Prévention
Cette étude cherche à prévenir l'apparition d'une maladie ou d'un trouble chez des personnes qui ne l'ont pas encore développé. Elles concernent souvent des personnes à risque et testent des vaccins, des changements de mode de vie ou des traitements préventifs.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans cette étude clinique, les participants sont répartis de manière aléatoire, comme lors d'un tirage au sort. Cela garantit l'équité et réduit les biais, rendant les résultats plus fiables. En attribuant les participants au hasard, les chercheurs peuvent comparer les traitements sans influence extérieure.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition non aléatoire
: basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.

Aucune (un seul groupe de participants)
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement, aucune répartition n'est nécessaire.

Comment les traitements sont administrés aux participants
Les participants reçoivent différentes combinaisons de traitements afin d'évaluer leur interaction. Ce modèle permet de déterminer si une combinaison est plus efficace qu'un traitement pris seul.

Autres façons d'administrer les traitements
Groupe unique
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement.

Affectation parallèle
: les participants sont répartis en groupes recevant chacun un traitement différent.

Affectation croisée
: les participants passent d'un traitement à un autre au cours de l'étude.

Plan séquentiel
: les traitements sont administrés successivement selon un ordre prédéterminé, pouvant varier selon la réaction du participant.

Autre type d'attribution
: L'attribution des traitements ne suit pas de schéma standard ni de protocole prédéfini.

Comment l'efficacité du traitement est contrôlée
Un placebo est utilisé pour comparer les effets du traitement expérimental à ceux d’une substance inactive, ce qui permet d’évaluer son efficacité réelle.

Autres options possibles
Non contrôlée par placebo
: aucun placebo n'est utilisé. Tous les participants reçoivent un traitement actif, souvent le traitement standard, pour permettre une comparaison directe.

Comment la nature du traitement est tenue confidentielle
Dans une étude en ouvert, tous les participants ainsi que les chercheurs savent quel traitement est administré. Ce type de protocole est utilisé lorsqu'il n'est pas nécessaire ou pas possible de masquer les traitements.

Autres méthodes de masquage
Simple aveugle
: les participants ignorent le traitement reçu, mais les chercheurs le connaissent.

Double aveugle
: ni les participants ni les chercheurs ne savent quel traitement est administré.

Triple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs et les personnes qui analysent les résultats ne savent pas quel traitement est administré.

Quadruple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs, les personnes qui analysent les résultats et les professionnels de santé en charge du suivi ne savent pas non plus quel traitement est administré.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
Tout sexeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
De 40 à 79 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Atherosclerosis
Cardiovascular Diseases
Hypercholesterolemia
Hypertension
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Diabetes Mellitus
Coronary Disease
Critères

Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, as determined by the new American Diabetes Association guidelines, which include a fasting plasma glucose level greater than 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), or a 2-hour postload value in the oral glucose tolerance test of greater than 200 mg/dl, with confirmation by a retest * For participants aged 40 years or older, history of CVD (heart attack, stroke, history of coronary revascularization, history of peripheral or carotid revascularization, or demonstrated angina) * For participants aged 55 years or older, a history of CVD is not required, but participant must be considered to be at high risk for experiencing a CVD event due to existing CVD, subclinical disease, or 2+ CVD risk factors * HbA1c 7.5%-9% (if on more drugs) or 7.5%-11% (if on fewer drugs)


Plan de l'étude

Découvrez tous les traitements administrés dans cette étude, leur description détaillée et ce qu'ils impliquent.
Groupes de traitement
Objectifs de l'étude
6 groupes d'intervention 

sont désignés dans cette étude

16,667% de chances 

d'être dans le groupe placebo en aveugle

Groupes de traitement
Groupe I
Expérimental
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels \<6.0%.
Groupe II
Comparateur actif
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.0 - 7.9%.
Groupe III
Expérimental
Open label administration of anti-hypertensive agents to reduce and maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) level to \<120 mmHg.
Groupe IV
Comparateur actif
Open label administration of multiple anti-hypertensive agents to maintain SBP level \<140 mm Hg.
Groupe 5
Expérimental
Double blind administration of 160 mg/day of fenofibrate in participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in patients with eGFR \<50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.
Groupe 6
Placebo
Double blind administration of placebo matching either 160 mg/day in participants with eGFR ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in participants with eGFR \<50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.
Objectifs de l'étude
Objectifs principaux

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. This was the primary outcome measure in all three trials: Glycemia (all participants), Blood Pressure (subgroup of participants not in Lipid Trial), and Lipid (subgroup of participants not in Blood Pressure Trial). In the Glycemia Trial, a finding of higher mortality in the intensive arm group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid) to their planned completion.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Primary outcome for Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death in Lipid Trial participants.
Objectifs secondaires

Time to death from any cause. Secondary measure for Glycemia Trial. A finding of higher mortality in the intensive-therapy group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid).

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal or fatal stroke among participants in the BP Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death, revascularization procedure or hospitalization for CHF in Lipid Trial participants.

Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude comporte 7 sites
Suspendu
Minneapolis Medical Research FoundationMinneapolis, United StatesVoir le site
Suspendu
Columbia UniversityNew York, United States
Suspendu
Wake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem, United States
Suspendu
Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, United States

Terminé7 Centres d'Étude