Terminé

NHLBI/NICHD Collaborative Studies of Asthma in Pregnancy

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

theophylline

+ beclomethasone
Médicament
Qui peut participer

Asthma

+ Lung Diseases
De 18 à 40 ans
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude thérapeutique

Phase 3
Interventionnel
Date de début : avril 1994

Résumé

Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 12 juillet 2016
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 avril 1994Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

To conduct a collaborative program of research on asthma and pregnancy consisting of two studies: the Asthma in Pregnancy Study (APS) was an observational study to evaluate relationships between asthma severity and treatment programs and perinatal outcome, and the Asthma Therapy in Pregnancy Trial (ATPT) was a randomized clinical trial of inhaled beclomethasone versus theophylline in the treatment of moderate asthma during pregnancy. Both studies were conducted in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) Network, an ongoing group of participating obstetric centers supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Studies were co-funded by the NHLBI. BACKGROUND: Asthma is one of the most common illnesses that complicates pregnancy. Asthma complicates at least 4 percent of all pregnancies; however, because at least 10 percent of the population appears to have nonspecific airway hyper-responsiveness, the true prevalence may be much higher. Asthma can produce serious maternal and fetal complications. A number of investigators have reported an increased incidence of pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, hyperemesis gravidarum, vaginal hemorrhage, toxemia, and induced and complicated labor. Fetal complications include increased risk of perinatal mortality, prematurity, low birth weight, and neonatal hypoxia. In contrast, several studies have failed to confirm some or all of these previous observations. Patients with severe asthma may have the greatest risk for complications during pregnancy, in addition to the risk of maternal morbidity from the asthma. For example, it has been shown that reduced pulmonary function in asthmatic women is associated with an increased likelihood of intrauterine growth retardation. On the other hand, studies in which asthma was successfully controlled have resulted in pregnancy outcomes similar to the general population. The mechanisms by which asthma may have adverse perinatal effects are not well known. Poor control of asthma leading to chronic or episodic fetal hypoxia is thought to be important. Medications used in asthma treatment may also play a role, although the limited data suggests minimal or no effects. In addition, it is possible that extrapulmonary autonomic nervous system abnormalities, such as uterine muscle hyperreactivity, could contribute to pre-term delivery or gestational hypertension independent of asthma control or therapy. Unfortunately, previous studies have been limited by relatively small numbers. Few studies have controlled for factors known to affect infant birth weight, such as maternal race, height, weight, parity, nutrition, and cigarette smoking. Particularly, race may be an important contributing factor in assessing the relationship between asthma and pregnancy outcomes, since Blacks of both sexes are twice as likely to be hospitalized from asthma and three times as likely to die from asthma as whites. Under the auspices of the National Asthma Education Program (NAEP), a Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy developed a statement regarding the treatment of asthma during pregnancy. In its deliberations, the Working Group noted the paucity of data on the relative contributions of biological, social, and environmental factors on asthma in pregnant women, as well as the lack of data on the efficacy and safety of commonly used asthma therapies in pregnancy. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The Asthma in Pregnancy Study evaluated the relationship between maternal asthma severity and control. The primary objective was to determine the frequency of preterm delivery <32 weeks among moderate and severe asthmatics compared to non-asthmatic controls. The incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants in women with mild and moderate asthma was a secondary outcome. Other independent variables included type of medications used, race, socioeconomic status, height, weight, parity, nutrition, smoking, other substance abuse, and prenatal care. Secondary outcomes included birth weight and prematurity, maternal pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and asthma morbidity. The study began February 1,1995 and patient recruitment continued for 46 months or less. The Asthma Therapy in Pregnancy Trial was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial which began recruitment in November, 1996, with enrollment lasting 44 months. Patients were randomized to receive either active oral theophylline and a placebo beclomethasone inhaler or an active beclomethasone inhaler and placebo oral theophylline. Albuterol was used for relief of symptoms. The primary outcome measure was incidence of Emergency Department visits or hospitalizations during pregnancy. Secondary outcome measures included birth weight, incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, lung function, daily peak flow, and quality of life. Patients were seen monthly for measurements of fetal growth, morbidity, and lung function. Extensive interviews were conducted with each patient at the first prenatal visit, in the third trimester, and shortly before birth. The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "Completed Date" entered in the Query View Report System (QVR).

Titre officielNHLBI/NICHD Collaborative Studies of Asthma in Pregnancy 
Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 12 juillet 2016
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
Traitement
Cette étude teste un ou plusieurs traitements pour évaluer leur efficacité contre une maladie ou un problème de santé spécifique. L'objectif est de voir si un nouveau médicament ou une thérapie fonctionne mieux, ou provoque moins d'effets secondaires que les options existantes.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans cette étude clinique, les participants sont répartis de manière aléatoire, comme lors d'un tirage au sort. Cela garantit l'équité et réduit les biais, rendant les résultats plus fiables. En attribuant les participants au hasard, les chercheurs peuvent comparer les traitements sans influence extérieure.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition non aléatoire
: basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.

Aucune (un seul groupe de participants)
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement, aucune répartition n'est nécessaire.

Comment la nature du traitement est tenue confidentielle
Dans une étude en double aveugle, ni les participants ni les chercheurs ne savent quel traitement est administré. C'est la méthode la plus rigoureuse pour éviter tout biais lié aux attentes et garantir des résultats fiables.

Autres méthodes de masquage
En ouvert
: tout le monde connaît le traitement administré.

Simple aveugle
: les participants ignorent le traitement reçu, mais les chercheurs le connaissent.

Triple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs et les personnes qui analysent les résultats ne savent pas quel traitement est administré.

Quadruple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs, les personnes qui analysent les résultats et les professionnels de santé en charge du suivi ne savent pas non plus quel traitement est administré.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
FemmeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
De 18 à 40 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Asthma
Lung Diseases
Critères

Asthmatic pregnant women.



Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude n'a pas de données de localisationAjoutez cette étude à vos favoris pour savoir quand les données de localisation seront disponibles. 

TerminéAucun centre d'étude