Terminé

Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI)

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

estrogens, conjugated

+ medroxyprogesterone
+ progesterone
Médicament
Qui peut participer

Bone Diseases
+8

+ Cardiovascular Diseases
+ Coronary Disease
De 45 à 64 ans
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude de prévention

Phase 3
Interventionnel
Date de début : septembre 1987

Résumé

Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 13 mai 2016
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 septembre 1987Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

To assess the effects of various postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapies on selected cardiovascular risk factors, including high density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, fibrinogen, and insulin and on osteoporosis risk factors. Conducted in collaboration with the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and the National Institute on Aging. The extended follow-up is for 3 years focusing on endometrium and breast evaluation. BACKGROUND: The life expectancy of American women is 78 years. More than one-third of those years are postmenopausal, during which time the risk of coronary heart disease is increased. The current United States estimate of more than 40 million women over the age of 50 indicates a large segment of the population at increased risk for coronary heart disease. Heart disease accounts for a third of all deaths in 50-69 year old women. In 1978, for example, approximately 66,000 of the 210,000 deaths in women 50-69 were attributed to heart disease. Premenopausal women have a lower rate of ischemic heart disease compared to men of similar age. Surgically induced or natural early menopause increases the risk of ischemic heart disease. These facts have focused interest on estrogens as possible mediators of the beneficial effects, and pointed to the need for further study of their relationship to atherosclerosis risk factors. Estimates from the Lipid Research Clinics Program indicate estrogen use in approximately one third of postmenopausal women. Analysis of Lipid Research Clinics data confirmed that administration of estrogens results in lower plasma low density lipoprotein levels and elevated plasma high density lipoprotein levels. Thus, the ratio of high density lipoprotein/low density lipoprotein levels is substantially increased. Given the inverse relationship between high density lipoprotein levels and coronary heart disease risk, this effect of estrogens on the plasma lipoproteins could be expected to further reduce coronary heart disease risk in women. Although the bulk of currently available evidence suggests benefit, some controversy concerning the effects of postmenopausal estrogens on morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease persists. Analysis of the Lipid Research Clinics Follow-up Study population indicated a potentially profound beneficial effect of postmenopausal estrogen use. Mortality from all causes decreased considerably in postmenopausal estrogen users, and the effect was most pronounced in hysterectomized and oophorectomized women. Similar results have been observed for cardiovascular deaths. These benefits appeared to be mediated by the higher high density lipoprotein levels associated with postmenopausal estrogen use. Framingham data are the primary sources reporting possible detrimental effects of postmenopausal estrogen use on cardiovascular morbidity; mortality from all cause and cardiovascular disease was not reported to vary by use. NHLBI convened a Trans-NIH Estrogen Working Group to make recommendations to NHLBI on the feasibility of undertaking a clinical trial of the effects of postmenopausal estrogen use on cardiovascular disease mortality. The Working Group identified a number of important research questions which needed to be answered to elucidate the effects of postmenopausal estrogen use on risk factors for cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. This initiative was the result of the Working Group's deliberations and recommendations. DESIGN NARRATIVE: There were seven clinical centers and a coordinating center in this randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The women were allocated to one of five treatment arms: placebo; conjugated equine estrogen (CEE), 0.625 milligrams per day; conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 milligrams per day plus cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 10 milligrams per day for 12 days per month; CEE, 0.625 milligrams per day plus consecutive MPA, 2.5 milligrams per day; CEE, 0.625 milligrams per day plus cyclic micronized progesterone (MP), 200 milligrams per day for 12 days a month. The four primary endpoints were chosen to represent four biological systems related to the risk of cardiovascular disease and included high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), systolic blood pressure, serum insulin, and fibrinogen. Recruitment began in October 1989 and ended in February 1991. Baseline data collected included blood pressure, resting heart rate, weight, waist/hip ratios and endometrial biopsy. Laboratory evaluations included lipid panel, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, insulin and glucose, bone density, fibrinogen, and in three clinics, additional hemostasis factors, renin substrate, plasma renin activity, aldosterone, and oral post-heparin lipase activity. All women underwent an endometrial aspiration biopsy at baseline and annually thereafter. Additional biopsy specimens were obtained if there was noncyclic endometrial bleeding. All women also had baseline and annual mammograms. Other data were collected on quality of life, exercise, diet, alcohol use, and smoking. Participants were followed at three, six and twelve months post-randomization, and at six month intervals thereafter for three years. Post-trial analyses of existing data sets were funded for three years by the cooperative agreement mechanism beginning August 1, 1994. A three-year safety follow-up funded through the contract mechanism began in 1994. It included three annual visits at which endometrial biopsies, mammograms, and some limited health information were obtained. The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Titre officielPostmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) 
Sponsor principalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Dernière mise à jour : 13 mai 2016
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
Prévention
Cette étude cherche à prévenir l'apparition d'une maladie ou d'un trouble chez des personnes qui ne l'ont pas encore développé. Elles concernent souvent des personnes à risque et testent des vaccins, des changements de mode de vie ou des traitements préventifs.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans cette étude clinique, les participants sont répartis de manière aléatoire, comme lors d'un tirage au sort. Cela garantit l'équité et réduit les biais, rendant les résultats plus fiables. En attribuant les participants au hasard, les chercheurs peuvent comparer les traitements sans influence extérieure.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition non aléatoire
: basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.

Aucune (un seul groupe de participants)
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement, aucune répartition n'est nécessaire.

Comment la nature du traitement est tenue confidentielle
Dans une étude en double aveugle, ni les participants ni les chercheurs ne savent quel traitement est administré. C'est la méthode la plus rigoureuse pour éviter tout biais lié aux attentes et garantir des résultats fiables.

Autres méthodes de masquage
En ouvert
: tout le monde connaît le traitement administré.

Simple aveugle
: les participants ignorent le traitement reçu, mais les chercheurs le connaissent.

Triple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs et les personnes qui analysent les résultats ne savent pas quel traitement est administré.

Quadruple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs, les personnes qui analysent les résultats et les professionnels de santé en charge du suivi ne savent pas non plus quel traitement est administré.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
FemmeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
De 45 à 64 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Bone Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Coronary Disease
Diabetes Mellitus
Heart Diseases
Hypercholesterolemia
Hypertension
Myocardial Ischemia
Osteoporosis
Thrombosis
Postmenopause
Critères

Postmenopausal women, ages 45 to 64. One third of the subjects had had a hysterectomy.



Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude n'a pas de données de localisationAjoutez cette étude à vos favoris pour savoir quand les données de localisation seront disponibles. 

TerminéAucun centre d'étude