Suspendu

Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS)

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

Argon Blue-Green Laser Photocoagulation

Procédure
Qui peut participer

Choroidal Neovascularization

+ Macular Degeneration
+ Histoplasmosis
À partir de 18 ans
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude thérapeutique

Phase 3
Interventionnel
Date de début : février 1979

Résumé

Sponsor principalNational Eye Institute (NEI)
Dernière mise à jour : 24 juin 2005
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 février 1979Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

To evaluate laser treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) through randomized, controlled clinical trials. The Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS) consisted of three sets of randomized, controlled clinical trials. Change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline was the primary outcome for all MPS trials. Other measures of vision are evaluated in each set of trials. The purpose of each is described below. Argon Study: To determine whether argon blue-green laser photocoagulation of leaking abnormal blood vessels in choroidal neovascular membranes outside the fovea (200 to 2,500 microns from the center of the foveal avascular zone \[FAZ\]) is of benefit in preventing or delaying loss of central vision in patients with age-related (senile) macular degeneration (AMD), presumed ocular histoplasmosis (POH), and idiopathic neovascular membranes (INVM). A separate trial was conducted for each of the three underlying conditions. Krypton Study: To determine whether krypton red laser photocoagulation of choroidal neovascular lesions with the posterior border 1 to 199 microns from the center of the FAZ is of benefit in preventing or delaying large losses of visual acuity in patients with AMD, POH, and INVM. A separate trial was conducted for each of the three underlying conditions. Foveal Study: To determine whether laser photocoagulation is of benefit in preventing or delaying further visual acuity loss in patients with new (never treated) or recurrent (previously treated with laser photocoagulation) choroidal neovascularization under the center of the FAZ. Two separate trials, one for each type of lesion, were carried out. In each randomized trial conducted by the MPS Group, focal laser photocoagulation was compared to observation without treatment. Patients were assigned to laser treatment or to observation with equal probability. The first set of MPS randomized trials, the Argon Study, focused on the effectiveness of photocoagulation with argon blue-green laser in eyes with discrete extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization. The study investigators, who began recruiting patients in 1979, estimated that 550 patients with AMD and 750 with POH would be required. Follow-up was to continue for 5 years to determine whether argon laser photocoagulation treatment could prevent or delay visual acuity loss in these patients. After the initiation of the Argon Study, a new krypton red laser became available. The new wavelength offered theoretical advantages over the argon laser for treating CNV that extended inside the FAZ of the macula. The Krypton Study design was analogous to the Argon Study, with the investigation of three underlying conditions, except that CNV was closer to the FAZ center. The third set of MPS clinical trials, the Foveal Study, was designed to determine whether laser photocoagulation was effective for delaying or preventing further visual acuity loss in AMD patients who have subfoveal CNV. Among patients assigned to laser treatment in the Foveal Study, argon laser treatment was compared with krypton red laser treatment of these lesions. The investigators originally projected that about 350 patients would be required for each clinical trial of the Foveal Study.

Titre officielMacular Photocoagulation Study (MPS) 
Sponsor principalNational Eye Institute (NEI)
Dernière mise à jour : 24 juin 2005
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
Traitement
Cette étude teste un ou plusieurs traitements pour évaluer leur efficacité contre une maladie ou un problème de santé spécifique. L'objectif est de voir si un nouveau médicament ou une thérapie fonctionne mieux, ou provoque moins d'effets secondaires que les options existantes.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans cette étude clinique, les participants sont répartis de manière aléatoire, comme lors d'un tirage au sort. Cela garantit l'équité et réduit les biais, rendant les résultats plus fiables. En attribuant les participants au hasard, les chercheurs peuvent comparer les traitements sans influence extérieure.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition non aléatoire
: basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.

Aucune (un seul groupe de participants)
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement, aucune répartition n'est nécessaire.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
Tout sexeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
À partir de 18 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Volontaires sains non autorisésIndique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Choroidal Neovascularization
Macular Degeneration
Histoplasmosis
Critères

Common Eligibility Criteria for the Argon, Krypton, and Foveal Studies: To be eligible, men and women must have been experiencing visual symptoms attributable to the macular lesion, such as decreased visual acuity or Amsler grid distortion, at the time of entry into the study. They also must have had visible, well-demarcated hyperfluorescence characteristic of classic choroidal neovascularization on fluorescein angiography. AMD patients were 50 years of age or older and had drusen visible in the macula of at least one eye. POH patients were at least 18 years old and had at least one characteristic histo spot in one or both eyes. INVM patients were at least 18 years old and had no evidence of AMD, POH, angioid streaks, high myopia, diabetic retinopathy, or any other condition that could be the cause of the neovascularization. In particular, INVM patients had neither drusen greater than MPS Standard Photograph No. 1.1 nor histo spots in either eye. Additional Patient Eligibility Criteria for the Argon Study: Each patient had a visible serous detachment of the sensory retina with a diffuse area of leakage, discrete choroidal neovascularization outside the fovea (200-2,500 microns from the center of the FAZ), and visual acuity of 20/100 or better in the study eye. Additional Patient Eligibility Criteria for the Krypton Study: All patients had a neovascular lesion consisting of neovascularization and possibly blood and/or pigment that extended into the FAZ. The posterior border of CNV could extend as close as 1 micron to the FAZ center. Visual acuity of the study eye was 20/400 or better. Additional Patient Eligibility Criteria for the Foveal Study: Only patients with AMD were eligible for this study. Fluorescein angiography of the eligible eye had to show evidence of a leaking choroidal neovascular membrane, some part of which extended under the center of the FAZ, or a neovascular lesion consisting of an old laser treatment scar and contiguous leaking neovascularization within 150 microns of the center of the FAZ. New, never-treated subfoveal lesions were less than four disc areas in size. Recurrent lesions were less than six disc areas in size, including the old treatment scar and new neovascularization. Best-corrected visual acuity was no better than 20/40 and no worse than 20/320.



Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude n'a pas de données de localisationAjoutez cette étude à vos favoris pour savoir quand les données de localisation seront disponibles. 

SuspenduAucun centre d'étude