Terminé

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Optic Neuritis

0 critères remplis à partir de votre profilVoyez en un coup d'œil comment votre profil répond à chaque critère d'éligibilité.
Ce qui est testé

Immunoglobulin

Médicament
Qui peut participer

Optic Neuritis

Jusqu'à 50 ans
Comment se déroule l'étude

Étude thérapeutique

Phase 3
Interventionnel
Date de début : août 1995

Résumé

Sponsor principalNational Eye Institute (NEI)
Dernière mise à jour : 17 septembre 2009
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude
Date de début de l'étude : 1 août 1995Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.

To determine whether high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is more effective than placebo in restoring lost visual function (visual acuity) in optic neuritis (ON). To determine the time course of recovery following IVIg administration. If the reports of IVIg-associated clinical improvement occurring within 3 to 6 months following treatment can be confirmed, this would provide indirect evidence that IVIg may promote central nervous system (CNS) remyelination in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis (MS). Optic neuritis is the leading cause of transient, spontaneous, reversible visual loss in young adults. Characteristically, patients present with central visual loss that peaks within a few days and is often associated with eye pain. Visual loss may be complete. Spontaneous recovery usually begins within 4 weeks, and marked recovery occurs within 1 to 3 months in most patients. Although clinical improvement is the rule, not all patients recover fully, and many are left with residual symptoms. Although there are limited pathological studies in inflammatory ON, the pathological changes are thought to be virtually identical with those seen in MS, with disruption of the blood-nerve (brain) barrier; primary demyelination with axonal sparing; variable degrees of lymphocytic infiltration; an abundance of macrophages around the inflammatory demyelination lesion; various degrees of remyelination; and, later, oligodendrocyte loss, axonal loss, and gliosis. Remyelination by oligodendrocytes occurs early in the MS lesion, as documented by myelin sheaths that are abnormally thin relative to axon diameter. These thin myelin sheaths are often seen prominently at the edge of demyelinated plaques. A recent series of studies has shown that within weeks of the initial event, there is extensive oligodendrocyte regeneration and remyelination. These immature oligodendrocytes express a series of developmentally restricted antigens. This finding has been interpreted to suggest that the cells that repopulate the acute plaque and that affect remyelination are newly generated and not residual, mature oligodendrocytes. These observations support the possibility that factors that promote remyelination could be used to improve clinical recovery in ON and MS. Work at the Mayo Clinic, has shown that both immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed against spinal cord antigens and purified polyclonal mouse IgG administered systemically promote extensive remyelination in SJL mice chronically infected with Theiler's virus. In addition, tissue culture studies suggest that IgG directed against CNS components may promote oligodendroglial proliferation and differentiation. Thus, experimental evidence exists for the concept that immunoglobulins may stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of oligodendrocytes. It is possible that myelin components on the surface of oligodendrocytes could function as receptors or components of receptors. Antibodies could mimic endogenous ligands, thereby inducing the proliferation or differentiation of these cells. In a preliminary, open-label pilot study of patients with chronic, steroid-unresponsive ON, Drs. van Engelen, Hommes, and colleagues suggested that improvement in visual recovery could be seen following IgG treatment in patients with chronic, stable ON. These encouraging but preliminary basic and clinical studies have prompted us to design a double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial of IVIg in patients with recently acquired but apparently permanent muscle paralysis from MS (NS31506) and to develop this NEI-funded ON study (U10EY1096301). In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, 60 patients were assigned to receive either IVIg or a placebo over a period of 3 months. In order to be eligible, patients who meet the inclusion criteria needed to have a stable loss of visual function (unchanged between the pre-enrollment screening visit and the enrollment visit). All patients wre re-examined at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, with the primary outcome being the impact of treatment on visual acuity at 6 months as determined by measurements on a retroilluminated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart at 4 meters. One group of patients received 0.4 g/kg Gammimmune N intravenously daily for 5 days, and thereafter once a month for 3 months (total: eight infusions). The other group of patients received infusions of 0.1 percent human serum albumin in 10 percent maltose (placebo) according to the identical protocol used for Gammimmune N. The primary outcome measure was improvement in Logmar visual acuity by an average of 0.2 at 6 months. The secondary outcome measures included change in visual acuity at 3, 9, and 12 months, as determined on a retroilluminated ETDRS chart at 4 meters; change in visual fields at 6 and 12 months; change in visual evoked responses at 3, 6, and 12 months; and change in neurological examination (EDSS, FS, AI) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Titre officielIntravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Optic Neuritis 
Sponsor principalNational Eye Institute (NEI)
Dernière mise à jour : 17 septembre 2009
Issu d'une base de données validée par les autorités. Revendiquer cette étude

Protocole

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.
Détails du design
Traitement
Cette étude teste un ou plusieurs traitements pour évaluer leur efficacité contre une maladie ou un problème de santé spécifique. L'objectif est de voir si un nouveau médicament ou une thérapie fonctionne mieux, ou provoque moins d'effets secondaires que les options existantes.

Comment les participants sont répartis entre les groupes de l'étude
Dans cette étude clinique, les participants sont répartis de manière aléatoire, comme lors d'un tirage au sort. Cela garantit l'équité et réduit les biais, rendant les résultats plus fiables. En attribuant les participants au hasard, les chercheurs peuvent comparer les traitements sans influence extérieure.

Autres méthodes de répartition
Répartition non aléatoire
: basée sur des critères spécifiques comme l'état de santé ou la décision du médecin.

Aucune (un seul groupe de participants)
: tous les participants reçoivent le même traitement, aucune répartition n'est nécessaire.

Comment la nature du traitement est tenue confidentielle
Dans une étude en double aveugle, ni les participants ni les chercheurs ne savent quel traitement est administré. C'est la méthode la plus rigoureuse pour éviter tout biais lié aux attentes et garantir des résultats fiables.

Autres méthodes de masquage
En ouvert
: tout le monde connaît le traitement administré.

Simple aveugle
: les participants ignorent le traitement reçu, mais les chercheurs le connaissent.

Triple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs et les personnes qui analysent les résultats ne savent pas quel traitement est administré.

Quadruple aveugle
: Les participants, les chercheurs, les personnes qui analysent les résultats et les professionnels de santé en charge du suivi ne savent pas non plus quel traitement est administré.

Éligibilité

Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.
Conditions
Critères
Tout sexeLe sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.
Jusqu'à 50 ansTranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.
Conditions
Pathologie
Optic Neuritis
Critères

To be eligible, patients must have a history of one or more episodes of previous demyelinating optic neuritis occurring in the setting of classic, adult-onset definite MS (clinically definite or laboratory-supported definite MS, or cranial MRI changes consistent with MS). In most cases, onset of MS will have occurred between the ages of 18 and 45. Patients must be younger than 50 years and must have apparently irreversible loss of visual acuity that meets the following criteria: Visual acuity must be worse than 20/40 for at least 6 months. Patients must be able to read at least one letter on the 1-meter eye chart. Patients with no light perception or hand movement vision only are not eligible. The above level of visual dysfunction must be observed on at least two serial examinations (separated by at least 1 month) in the Department of Ophthalmology at the Mayo Clinic. Optic disc pallor must be present. Patients must have impairment in the affected eye(s) on perimetry consistent with optic nerve dysfunction and must have a visual field mean deviation of less than -4.00. Patients must not have received ACTH or corticosteroids within the preceding 2 months.



Centres d'étude

Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.
Cette étude comporte 2 sites
Suspendu
Mayo Clinic, Department of NeurologyRochester, United StatesVoir le site
Suspendu
Mayo ClinicRochester, United States

Terminé2 Centres d'Étude