Completado

BTI-RADS MMulticentric Study for the Validation and Improvement of a Structured Report Tool for the Imaging Characterization of Bone Tumors - Bone Tumor Imaging Report and Data System (BTI-RADS)

0 criterios cumplidosConsulta de un vistazo cómo tu perfil cumple con cada criterio de elegibilidad.
Qué se está recopilando

Colección de datos

Recopilados a partir de historiales médicos y datos pasados - Retrospectivo
Quiénes están siendo reclutados

Enfermedades de los Huesos+2

+ Neoplasias Óseas

+ Enfermedades del sistema musculoesquelético

+7 Criterios de eligibilidad
Ver todos los criterios de elegibilidad
Cómo está diseñado el estudio

Casos y Controles

Examen de las características de personas con una enfermedad para identificar factores genéticos o ambientales que contribuyen a la condición.
Observacional
Inicio del estudio: mayo de 2021
Ver detalles del protocolo

Resumen

Patrocinador PrincipalCentral Hospital, Nancy, France
Última actualización: 28 de enero de 2026
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Fecha de inicio: 1 de mayo de 2021

Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.

The characterization of focal bone lesions by imaging can be difficult. Primary bone sarcomas are rare, accounting for 0.2% of all malignant tumors occurring at an estimated rate of one tenth that of soft tissue sarcomas. Focal bone lesions have a wide differential diagnosis, including benign and malignant neoplasms, metabolic disorders, degenerative changes, and tumor-like conditions. The precise differentiation between benign and malignant bone tumors is essential for optimal patient management, with a considerable impact on prognosis and survival rates. The relapse-free survival of patients with sarcoma is significantly better when treatment is guided by a multidisciplinary oncology committee. In addition, surgical treatment in referral centers reduces the risk of recurrence and death. Due to the rarity of primary malignant bone neoplasms and the varied imaging presentation of focal bone lesions, radiologists outside of cancer centers tend to have little experience with this type of abnormality. Thus, imaging reports can be unclear and misleading, increasing the risk of misdiagnosis and suboptimal patient management. Previous studies have largely addressed the specific imaging features of bone tumors, and a systematic approach to the assessment of bone tumors has been recommended. However, there is little information on how to combine these imaging results and which are most relevant for characterization of lesions. Various studies have demonstrated the value of structured analysis of medical information in clinical decision making and such an approach is currently used for the assessment of malignancy in various organs and systems. For bone tumors, this approach requires the combined analysis of several demographic, clinical and imaging characteristics. Of the large number of features described, 16 (seven benign and nine malignant) were considered relevant for the differentiation between benign and malignant tumors. Three signs (Lodwick-Madewell grade III, aggressive periosteal reaction and suspected or confirmed metastatic disease) had a mean frequency of associated malignancy greater than 80%. Thus, lesions showing any of these signs should be considered malignant until proven otherwise. It should be noted that these 3 signs are CT or standard radiography criteria, confirming the essential role of X-ray-based methods for the characterization of bone tumors. On the contrary, certain signs classically suggestive of malignancy, such as a history of pain, pathological fracture and endosteal scalloping, have been identified as non-determining indicators for the characterization of these lesions. These data could contribute to a more precise assessment of the aggressive potential of a bone tumor. Finally, on the basis of these results, an evidence-based classification of solitary bone lesions (BTI-RADS) was proposed, allowing the stratification of bone tumors into four classes with an average frequency of malignancy of 0%; 2.2% (1.1 - 3.1%), 20.1% (17 - 24.4%) and 71% (65.6 - 75%) for each class. This system was applicable for readers with different levels of expertise, including a general radiologist, with acceptable interobserver reproducibility (Kappa = 0.67). BTI-RADS could be particularly beneficial outside of specialized oncology centers. However, the BTI-RADS was established based on a single-center analysis of a relatively small patient population. The application of this system in a larger population in multicentric study is necessary to validate this tool and potentially refine it through the identification of additional pertinent criteria for lesion characterization.

Título OficialMulticentric Study for the Validation and Improvement of a Structured Report Tool for the Imaging Characterization of Bone Tumors - Bone Tumor Imaging Report and Data System (BTI-RADS)
NCT04884048
Patrocinador PrincipalCentral Hospital, Nancy, France
Última actualización: 28 de enero de 2026
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Protocolo

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.
Detalles del Diseño

Se reclutarán 1100 pacientes

Número total de participantes que el ensayo clínico espera reclutar.

Casos y Controles

Estos estudios comparan personas que tienen una enfermedad (casos) con quienes no la tienen (controles), analizando exposiciones o factores de riesgo pasados para identificar posibles causas.

Elegibilidad

Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.
Condiciones
Criterios

Cualquier sexo

Sexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.

Voluntarios sanos no permitidos

Indica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.

Condiciones

Patología

Enfermedades de los HuesosNeoplasias ÓseasEnfermedades del sistema musculoesqueléticoNeoplasiasNeoplasias por Sitio

Criterios

3 criterios de inclusión requeridos para participar
Patient evaluated for the initial imaging characterization of a focal bone lesion.

Availability of conventional radiographs or a CT study for patients with lesions in the spine, pelvis or calvarium.

Availability of a contrast enhanced MRI study.

4 criterios de exclusión impiden participar
Prio surgery

History of neoadjuvant threatment

Contra-indications to contrast enhanced MRI

Diffuse bone pathology

Plan de Estudio

Conoce todos los tratamientos administrados en este estudio, su descripción detallada y en qué consisten.
Objetivos del Estudio

Objetivos del Estudio

Objetivos Primarios

Centros del Estudio

Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.

Este estudio tiene 9 ubicaciones

Suspendido

University hospital of Nancy

Nancy, FranceAbrir University hospital of Nancy en Google Maps
Suspendido

Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre site Cochin APHP

Paris, France
Suspendido

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, France
Suspendido

Groupement des Hopitaux de l'institut catholique de Lille

Lille, France
Completado9 Centros de Estudio