Completado

Standard vs Long IV Catheter Long-Term IV Survival Comparison

0 criterios cumplidosConsulta de un vistazo cómo tu perfil cumple con cada criterio de elegibilidad.
Qué se está evaluando

Standard Long IV 4.78 cm 20 g catheter

+ Ultra-Long IV 6.35 cm 20 g catheter

Dispositivo
Quiénes están siendo reclutados

A partir de 18 años
Ver todos los criterios de elegibilidad
Cómo está diseñado el estudio

Estudio de Tratamiento

Intervencional
Inicio del estudio: octubre de 2018
Ver detalles del protocolo

Resumen

Patrocinador PrincipalCorewell Health East
Última actualización: 28 de enero de 2026
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Fecha de inicio: 29 de octubre de 2018

Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.

Patients with poor intravenous (IV) access present a daily challenge to emergency department (ED) practitioners. Placement of an ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral IV catheter in this patient population is a viable and safe option. Ultrasound-guided IVs are often the last recourse for IV access before resorting to more invasive procedures in patients with difficult access. Successful cannulation with US-guided IV occurs in more than 90% of cases compared with 25-35% with traditional IV placement in patients with difficult vascular access. Once cannulated, however, the failure rate of IV catheters placed under ultrasound guidance is concerning compared with traditional blind IV placement. Overall failure rates after successful IV cannulation for US-guided IVs is 45-56% when compared to traditional IV placement which is 19-25%. Because failure rate is high, it is important to approach insertions methodically to improve survival rates. A variable that may alter the survival of US-guided IVs that has not been studied is the length of catheter that resides in the vein. Currently the general accepted rule is that an "adequate" amount of the catheter should be in the vein to avoid failure of the catheter. Our preliminary data focused on defining this relationship. In our study, 100% of catheters failed in which less than 30% of the catheter was placed within the vein and no failures in those IVs in which at least 65% of the catheter was in the vein. This study was performed by the PI at Beaumont this past year and is published in Emergency Medicine Journal. This study is a prospective randomized controlled study of catheter longevity comparing a 4.78 cm (1.88 in) catheter to a longer 6.35 cm (2.5 in) catheter. Subjects will consist of a convenience sample of patients with difficult IV access presenting to the Beaumont Hospitals emergency department that require US-guided IV access. Standard of care is defined as use of a readily available 1.88 inch IV catheter that is used daily by emergency department personnel. Following consent, patients will be randomized to the control arm using the standard 4.78 cm catheter, or the experimental arm using a 6.35 cm catheter. All catheters are 20 gauge in diameter. After patient enrollment, the insertion tech, nurse or physician who has been credentialed in ultrasound-guided vascular access will place catheters in study subjects. Staff are expected to attempt a minimum of 3 attempts before enlisting another provider for help. After initial assessment, follow-up functionality of the catheter will be assessed every 24 hours by the research team as long as the patient is hospitalized, up to 30 days. Function of the catheter will be assessed daily by research staff. Function is defined by a catheter's ability to draw back 5 ml of blood, flush with 5 ml normal saline without resistance, or if IV fluids or medication are continually infusing through the IV. Other data variables collected include: patient pertinent medical history, vitals, age, sex, cannulation success or failure, vein diameter, length of catheter in vein as well as % length of the catheter in the vein, angle of insertion, number of venous access attempts, time to IV insertion (tourniquet to tegaderm), location of IV insertion, medications infused or use for ionic contrast injection for computed tomography.

Título OficialStandard vs Long IV Catheter Long-Term IV Survival Comparison
NCT03655106
Patrocinador PrincipalCorewell Health East
Última actualización: 28 de enero de 2026
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Protocolo

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.
Detalles del Diseño

Se reclutarán 270 pacientes

Número total de participantes que el ensayo clínico espera reclutar.

Estudio de Tratamiento

Estos estudios prueban nuevas formas de tratar una enfermedad, condición o problema de salud. El objetivo es determinar si un nuevo medicamento, terapia o enfoque funciona mejor o tiene menos efectos secundarios que las opciones existentes.



Elegibilidad

Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.
Criterios

Cualquier sexo

Sexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.

A partir de 18 años

Rango de edades de los participantes que pueden unirse al estudio.

Voluntarios sanos no permitidos

Indica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.

Criterios

Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years or older Self-reported difficult IV Access Patient and any one of the following: * Greater than 2 sticks in previous admission/hospital encounter * History of rescue vascular access device (such as US-guided IV, PICC line, midline, or CVC) * End-stage renal disease on dialysis * History of IV Drug Use * History of Sickle Cell Disease Exclusion Criteria: Age under 18 years old * Voluntary withdrawal or refusal to participate * Previous enrollment into the study

Plan de Estudio

Conoce todos los tratamientos administrados en este estudio, su descripción detallada y en qué consisten.
Grupos de Tratamiento
Objetivos del Estudio

2 grupos de intervención están designados en este estudio

0% de probabilidad de ser asignado al grupo placebo

Grupos de Tratamiento

Grupo I

Comparador Activo
Placement of Standard Long IV 4.78 cm 20 g catheter

Grupo II

Experimental
Placement of Ultra-Long length IV 6.35 cm 20 g catheter

Objetivos del Estudio

Objetivos Primarios

Objetivos Secundarios

Centros del Estudio

Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.

Este estudio tiene una ubicación

Suspendido

Beaumont Hospitals

Royal Oak, United StatesAbrir Beaumont Hospitals en Google Maps
Completado1 Centros de Estudio