ACCORDControl Glucémico, de Presión Arterial y de Lípidos Intensivo vs Estándar en Diabetes Tipo 2
Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar los efectos de un control intensivo versus un control estándar de los niveles de azúcar en la sangre, presión arterial y lípidos en la prevención de la primera ocurrencia de un evento cardiovascular mayor, como un ataque cardíaco no fatal, un accidente cerebrovascular no fatal, o muerte cardiovascular en individuos con diabetes tipo 2.
Anti-hyperglycemic Agents
+ Anti-hyperglycemic Agents
+ Anti-hypertensive Agents
Enfermedades Oclusivas Arteriales+11
+ Arteriosclerosis
+ Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino
Estudio de Prevención
Resumen
Fecha de inicio: 1 de septiembre de 1999
Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.BACKGROUND: Currently, about 17 million Americans have been diagnosed with diabetes and more than 90 percent of them have type 2 diabetes. The number of people with this form of diabetes, formerly known as adult onset or non-insulin dependent diabetes, is growing rapidly. By 2050, the number of Americans with diagnosed diabetes is projected to increase by 165 percent to 29 million, of whom 27 million will have the type 2 form. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in people with type 2 diabetes; these individuals die of CVD at rates two to four times higher than those who do not have diabetes. They also experience more nonfatal heart attacks and strokes. Type 2 diabetes is associated with older age and is more common in those who are overweight or obese and have a family history of diabetes. Women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy, adults with impaired glucose tolerance, people with a sedentary lifestyle, and members of a minority race/ethnicity are also at a greater risk for developing type 2 diabetes. African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, American Indians, and some Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are at particularly high risk for type 2 diabetes. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The three strategies tested in ACCORD included the following: (1) Blood sugar - ACCORD was designed to determine whether lowering blood glucose to a level closer to normal than called for in current guidelines reduces CVD risk. The study estimated effects on CVD of that level compared with a level that is usually targeted. (2) Blood pressure - many people with type 2 diabetes have high blood pressure. The blood pressure part of the trial was designed to determine the effects of lowering blood pressure in the context of good blood sugar control, that is to determine whether lowering blood pressure to normal (systolic pressure less than 120 mm Hg) will better reduce CVD risk, as compared to a usually-targeted level in current clinical practice (i.e., below the definition of hypertension; systolic pressure less than 140 mm Hg). (3) Blood Fats - Many people with diabetes have high levels of LDL ("bad") cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as low levels of HDL ("good") cholesterol. ACCORD participants who are selected for this part of the trial were assigned to an intervention to improve blood fat levels. This part of the study looked at the effects of lowering LDL cholesterol and blood triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol compared to an intervention that only lowers LDL cholesterol, all in the context of good blood sugar control. A drug from a class of drugs called "fibrates" was used to lower triglycerides and increase HDL cholesterol, whereas a drug from the class of drugs called "statins" was used to lower LDL cholesterol. All ACCORD participants received blood sugar treatment from the study. Based on the second trial (Blood Pressure or Lipid) they were assigned to, participants also received their high blood pressure or cholesterol care from the study. Study participants received all medication and treatments related to the study free of charge. Individuals who selected for and consented to participate in the ACCORD study continued to see their personal physician for all other health care. In summary, the ACCORD Study was a double 2x2 factorial design with factors consisting of: intensive versus standard glycemic control, intensive versus standard blood pressure control, and blinded fenofibrate or placebo in combination with simvastatin to maintain desirable LDL-C levels. All 10,251 participants were randomized to the glycemic interventions; a subgroup of 4,733 participants who met the blood pressure entry criteria were randomized to the blood pressure interventions in one 2x2 trial; and a distinct subgroup of 5,518 participants who met the lipid entry criteria were randomized to the lipid interventions in the second 2x2 trial. All participants had established type 2 diabetes and were recruited from 77 clinical centers in the United States (64 sites) and Canada (13 sites). On February 6, 2008, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) announced that participants in the intensive glycemia treatment would be transitioned to the ACCORD standard glycemic treatment approach due to higher mortality in the intensive treatment group terminating the experimental arm of the Glycemia Trial early. The Blood Pressure and Lipid trials continued as designed to their planned termination in 2009.
Protocolo
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.Se reclutarán 10.251 pacientes
Número total de participantes que el ensayo clínico espera reclutar.Estudio de Prevención
Elegibilidad
Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.Cualquier sexo
Sexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.De 40 a 79 años
Rango de edades de los participantes que pueden unirse al estudio.Voluntarios sanos no permitidos
Indica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.Condiciones
Patología
Criterios
Plan de Estudio
Conoce todos los tratamientos administrados en este estudio, su descripción detallada y en qué consisten.6 grupos de intervención están designados en este estudio
16.666666666666668% de probabilidad de ser asignado al grupo placebo
Grupos de Tratamiento
Grupo I
ExperimentalGrupo II
Comparador ActivoGrupo III
ExperimentalGrupo IV
Comparador ActivoGrupo 5
ExperimentalGrupo 6
PlaceboObjetivos del Estudio
Objetivos Primarios
Objetivos Secundarios
Centros del Estudio
Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.Este estudio tiene 7 ubicaciones
Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation
Minneapolis, United StatesAbrir Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation en Google MapsColumbia University
New York, United StatesWake Forest University
Winston-Salem, United StatesCase Western Reserve University
Cleveland, United States