Completado
ACCORD

Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)

0 criterios cumplidosConsulta de un vistazo cómo tu perfil cumple con cada criterio de elegibilidad.
Qué se está evaluando

Anti-hyperglycemic Agents

+ Anti-hypertensive Agents
+ Blinded fenofibrate or placebo plus simvastatin
Medicamento
Quiénes están siendo reclutados

Atherosclerosis
+4

+ Cardiovascular Diseases
+ Hypercholesterolemia
De 40 a 79 años
Cómo está diseñado el estudio

Estudio de Prevención

Controlado con Placebo
Fase 3
Intervencional
Inicio del estudio: septiembre de 1999

Resumen

Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 22 de noviembre de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio
Fecha de inicio: 1 de septiembre de 1999Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.

The purpose of this study is to prevent major cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, or cardiovascular death) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus using intensive glycemic control, intensive blood pressure control, and multiple lipid management. BACKGROUND: Currently, about 17 million Americans have been diagnosed with diabetes and more than 90 percent of them have type 2 diabetes. The number of people with this form of diabetes, formerly known as adult onset or non-insulin dependent diabetes, is growing rapidly. By 2050, the number of Americans with diagnosed diabetes is projected to increase by 165 percent to 29 million, of whom 27 million will have the type 2 form. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in people with type 2 diabetes; these individuals die of CVD at rates two to four times higher than those who do not have diabetes. They also experience more nonfatal heart attacks and strokes. Type 2 diabetes is associated with older age and is more common in those who are overweight or obese and have a family history of diabetes. Women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy, adults with impaired glucose tolerance, people with a sedentary lifestyle, and members of a minority race/ethnicity are also at a greater risk for developing type 2 diabetes. African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, American Indians, and some Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are at particularly high risk for type 2 diabetes. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The three strategies tested in ACCORD included the following: (1) Blood sugar - ACCORD was designed to determine whether lowering blood glucose to a level closer to normal than called for in current guidelines reduces CVD risk. The study estimated effects on CVD of that level compared with a level that is usually targeted. (2) Blood pressure - many people with type 2 diabetes have high blood pressure. The blood pressure part of the trial was designed to determine the effects of lowering blood pressure in the context of good blood sugar control, that is to determine whether lowering blood pressure to normal (systolic pressure less than 120 mm Hg) will better reduce CVD risk, as compared to a usually-targeted level in current clinical practice (i.e., below the definition of hypertension; systolic pressure less than 140 mm Hg). (3) Blood Fats - Many people with diabetes have high levels of LDL ("bad") cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as low levels of HDL ("good") cholesterol. ACCORD participants who are selected for this part of the trial were assigned to an intervention to improve blood fat levels. This part of the study looked at the effects of lowering LDL cholesterol and blood triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol compared to an intervention that only lowers LDL cholesterol, all in the context of good blood sugar control. A drug from a class of drugs called "fibrates" was used to lower triglycerides and increase HDL cholesterol, whereas a drug from the class of drugs called "statins" was used to lower LDL cholesterol. All ACCORD participants received blood sugar treatment from the study. Based on the second trial (Blood Pressure or Lipid) they were assigned to, participants also received their high blood pressure or cholesterol care from the study. Study participants received all medication and treatments related to the study free of charge. Individuals who selected for and consented to participate in the ACCORD study continued to see their personal physician for all other health care. In summary, the ACCORD Study was a double 2x2 factorial design with factors consisting of: intensive versus standard glycemic control, intensive versus standard blood pressure control, and blinded fenofibrate or placebo in combination with simvastatin to maintain desirable LDL-C levels. All 10,251 participants were randomized to the glycemic interventions; a subgroup of 4,733 participants who met the blood pressure entry criteria were randomized to the blood pressure interventions in one 2x2 trial; and a distinct subgroup of 5,518 participants who met the lipid entry criteria were randomized to the lipid interventions in the second 2x2 trial. All participants had established type 2 diabetes and were recruited from 77 clinical centers in the United States (64 sites) and Canada (13 sites). On February 6, 2008, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) announced that participants in the intensive glycemia treatment would be transitioned to the ACCORD standard glycemic treatment approach due to higher mortality in the intensive treatment group terminating the experimental arm of the Glycemia Trial early. The Blood Pressure and Lipid trials continued as designed to their planned termination in 2009.

Título OficialAction to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) 
Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 22 de noviembre de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Protocolo

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.
Detalles del Diseño
Se reclutarán 10.251 pacientesNúmero total de participantes que el ensayo clínico espera reclutar.
Estudio de Prevención
Los estudios de prevención buscan evitar que se desarrolle una enfermedad. A menudo incluyen a personas en riesgo y evalúan vacunas, cambios en el estilo de vida o medicamentos preventivos.

Cómo se asignan los participantes a diferentes grupos/brazos
En este estudio clínico, los participantes se colocan en grupos de forma aleatoria, como si se lanzara una moneda. Esto garantiza que el estudio sea justo e imparcial, lo que hace que los resultados sean más confiables. Al asignar a los participantes al azar, los investigadores pueden comparar mejor los tratamientos sin influencias externas.

Otras formas de asignar participantes
Asignación no aleatoria
: Los participantes se asignan en función de factores específicos, como su condición médica o la decisión de un médico.

Ninguna (ensayo de un solo brazo)
: Si el estudio tiene un solo grupo, todos los participantes reciben el mismo tratamiento y no se necesita asignación.

Cómo se administran los tratamientos a los participantes
Los participantes reciben diferentes combinaciones de tratamientos para evaluar cómo funcionan juntos. Este enfoque ayuda a determinar si una combinación es más efectiva que un tratamiento individual.

Otras formas de asignar tratamientos
Asignación a un solo grupo
: Todos reciben el mismo tratamiento.

Asignación paralela
: Los participantes se dividen en grupos separados, y cada grupo recibe un tratamiento diferente.

Asignación cruzada
: Los participantes cambian de tratamiento durante el estudio.

Asignación secuencial
: Los participantes reciben tratamientos uno tras otro en un orden específico, posiblemente según su respuesta individual.

Otra asignación
: La asignación de tratamientos no sigue un diseño estándar o predefinido.

Cómo se controla la efectividad del tratamiento
En un estudio controlado con placebo, algunos participantes reciben el tratamiento experimental, mientras que otros reciben una sustancia inerte (placebo) para comparar los resultados. Este método ayuda a aislar el efecto del tratamiento de los efectos psicológicos de recibir cualquier intervención.

Otras opciones
No controlado con placebo
: No se utiliza placebo. Todos los participantes reciben el tratamiento real o intervenciones alternativas (a menudo el tratamiento estándar), y las comparaciones se realizan entre estos tratamientos.

Cómo se mantiene la confidencialidad de las intervenciones asignadas a los participantes
Todos los involucrados en el estudio saben qué tratamiento se está administrando. Esto se utiliza cuando no es posible o necesario ocultar los detalles del tratamiento a los participantes o investigadores.

Otras formas de enmascarar la información
Simple ciego
: Los participantes no saben qué tratamiento están recibiendo, pero los investigadores sí.

Doble ciego
: Ni los participantes ni los investigadores saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Triple ciego
: Participantes, investigadores y evaluadores de resultados no saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Cuádruple ciego
: Participantes, investigadores, evaluadores de resultados y personal de atención no saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Elegibilidad

Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.
Condiciones
Criterios
Cualquier sexoSexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.
De 40 a 79 añosRango de edades de los participantes que pueden unirse al estudio.
Voluntarios sanos no permitidosIndica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.
Condiciones
Patología
Atherosclerosis
Cardiovascular Diseases
Hypercholesterolemia
Hypertension
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Diabetes Mellitus
Coronary Disease
Criterios

Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, as determined by the new American Diabetes Association guidelines, which include a fasting plasma glucose level greater than 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), or a 2-hour postload value in the oral glucose tolerance test of greater than 200 mg/dl, with confirmation by a retest * For participants aged 40 years or older, history of CVD (heart attack, stroke, history of coronary revascularization, history of peripheral or carotid revascularization, or demonstrated angina) * For participants aged 55 years or older, a history of CVD is not required, but participant must be considered to be at high risk for experiencing a CVD event due to existing CVD, subclinical disease, or 2+ CVD risk factors * HbA1c 7.5%-9% (if on more drugs) or 7.5%-11% (if on fewer drugs)


Plan de Estudio

Conoce todos los tratamientos administrados en este estudio, su descripción detallada y en qué consisten.
Grupos de Tratamiento
Objetivos del Estudio
6 grupos de intervención 

están designados en este estudio

16.666666666666668% de probabilidad 

de ser asignado al grupo placebo

Grupos de Tratamiento
Grupo I
Experimental
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels \<6.0%.
Grupo II
Comparador Activo
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.0 - 7.9%.
Grupo III
Experimental
Open label administration of anti-hypertensive agents to reduce and maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) level to \<120 mmHg.
Grupo IV
Comparador Activo
Open label administration of multiple anti-hypertensive agents to maintain SBP level \<140 mm Hg.
Grupo 5
Experimental
Double blind administration of 160 mg/day of fenofibrate in participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in patients with eGFR \<50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.
Grupo 6
Placebo
Double blind administration of placebo matching either 160 mg/day in participants with eGFR ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in participants with eGFR \<50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.
Objetivos del Estudio
Objetivos Primarios

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. This was the primary outcome measure in all three trials: Glycemia (all participants), Blood Pressure (subgroup of participants not in Lipid Trial), and Lipid (subgroup of participants not in Blood Pressure Trial). In the Glycemia Trial, a finding of higher mortality in the intensive arm group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid) to their planned completion.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Primary outcome for Blood Pressure Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death in Lipid Trial participants.
Objetivos Secundarios

Time to death from any cause. Secondary measure for Glycemia Trial. A finding of higher mortality in the intensive-therapy group led to an early discontinuation of therapy after a mean of 3.5 years of follow-up. Intensive arm participants were transitioned to standard arm strategy over a period of 0.2 year and followed for an additional 1.2 years to the planned end of the Glycemia Trial while participating in one of the other sub-trials (BP or Lipid).

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal or fatal stroke among participants in the BP Trial.

Time to first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death, revascularization procedure or hospitalization for CHF in Lipid Trial participants.

Centros del Estudio

Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.
Este estudio tiene 7 ubicaciones
Suspendido
Minneapolis Medical Research FoundationMinneapolis, United StatesVer ubicación
Suspendido
Columbia UniversityNew York, United States
Suspendido
Wake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem, United States
Suspendido
Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, United States

Completado7 Centros de Estudio