Completado

ACCORDControl Glucémico, de Presión Arterial y de Lípidos Intensivo vs Estándar en Diabetes Tipo 2

0 criterios cumplidosConsulta de un vistazo cómo tu perfil cumple con cada criterio de elegibilidad.
Objetivo del estudio

Este estudio tiene como objetivo comparar los efectos de un control intensivo versus un control estándar de los niveles de azúcar en la sangre, presión arterial y lípidos en la prevención de la primera ocurrencia de un evento cardiovascular mayor, como un ataque cardíaco no fatal, un accidente cerebrovascular no fatal, o muerte cardiovascular en individuos con diabetes tipo 2.

Qué se está evaluando

Anti-hyperglycemic Agents

+ Anti-hyperglycemic Agents

+ Anti-hypertensive Agents

Medicamento
Quiénes están siendo reclutados

Enfermedades Oclusivas Arteriales+11

+ Arteriosclerosis

+ Enfermedades del Sistema Endocrino

De 40 a 79 años
+4 Criterios de eligibilidad
Ver todos los criterios de elegibilidad
Cómo está diseñado el estudio

Estudio de Prevención

Controlado con PlaceboFase 3
Intervencional
Inicio del estudio: septiembre de 1999
Ver detalles del protocolo

Resumen

Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 22 de noviembre de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Fecha de inicio: 1 de septiembre de 1999

Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.

BACKGROUND: Currently, about 17 million Americans have been diagnosed with diabetes and more than 90 percent of them have type 2 diabetes. The number of people with this form of diabetes, formerly known as adult onset or non-insulin dependent diabetes, is growing rapidly. By 2050, the number of Americans with diagnosed diabetes is projected to increase by 165 percent to 29 million, of whom 27 million will have the type 2 form. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in people with type 2 diabetes; these individuals die of CVD at rates two to four times higher than those who do not have diabetes. They also experience more nonfatal heart attacks and strokes. Type 2 diabetes is associated with older age and is more common in those who are overweight or obese and have a family history of diabetes. Women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy, adults with impaired glucose tolerance, people with a sedentary lifestyle, and members of a minority race/ethnicity are also at a greater risk for developing type 2 diabetes. African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, American Indians, and some Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are at particularly high risk for type 2 diabetes. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The three strategies tested in ACCORD included the following: (1) Blood sugar - ACCORD was designed to determine whether lowering blood glucose to a level closer to normal than called for in current guidelines reduces CVD risk. The study estimated effects on CVD of that level compared with a level that is usually targeted. (2) Blood pressure - many people with type 2 diabetes have high blood pressure. The blood pressure part of the trial was designed to determine the effects of lowering blood pressure in the context of good blood sugar control, that is to determine whether lowering blood pressure to normal (systolic pressure less than 120 mm Hg) will better reduce CVD risk, as compared to a usually-targeted level in current clinical practice (i.e., below the definition of hypertension; systolic pressure less than 140 mm Hg). (3) Blood Fats - Many people with diabetes have high levels of LDL ("bad") cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as low levels of HDL ("good") cholesterol. ACCORD participants who are selected for this part of the trial were assigned to an intervention to improve blood fat levels. This part of the study looked at the effects of lowering LDL cholesterol and blood triglycerides and increasing HDL cholesterol compared to an intervention that only lowers LDL cholesterol, all in the context of good blood sugar control. A drug from a class of drugs called "fibrates" was used to lower triglycerides and increase HDL cholesterol, whereas a drug from the class of drugs called "statins" was used to lower LDL cholesterol. All ACCORD participants received blood sugar treatment from the study. Based on the second trial (Blood Pressure or Lipid) they were assigned to, participants also received their high blood pressure or cholesterol care from the study. Study participants received all medication and treatments related to the study free of charge. Individuals who selected for and consented to participate in the ACCORD study continued to see their personal physician for all other health care. In summary, the ACCORD Study was a double 2x2 factorial design with factors consisting of: intensive versus standard glycemic control, intensive versus standard blood pressure control, and blinded fenofibrate or placebo in combination with simvastatin to maintain desirable LDL-C levels. All 10,251 participants were randomized to the glycemic interventions; a subgroup of 4,733 participants who met the blood pressure entry criteria were randomized to the blood pressure interventions in one 2x2 trial; and a distinct subgroup of 5,518 participants who met the lipid entry criteria were randomized to the lipid interventions in the second 2x2 trial. All participants had established type 2 diabetes and were recruited from 77 clinical centers in the United States (64 sites) and Canada (13 sites). On February 6, 2008, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) announced that participants in the intensive glycemia treatment would be transitioned to the ACCORD standard glycemic treatment approach due to higher mortality in the intensive treatment group terminating the experimental arm of the Glycemia Trial early. The Blood Pressure and Lipid trials continued as designed to their planned termination in 2009.

NCT00000620NCT00182910
Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 22 de noviembre de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Protocolo

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.
Detalles del Diseño

Se reclutarán 10.251 pacientes

Número total de participantes que el ensayo clínico espera reclutar.

Estudio de Prevención

Los estudios de prevención buscan evitar que se desarrolle una enfermedad. A menudo incluyen a personas en riesgo y evalúan vacunas, cambios en el estilo de vida o medicamentos preventivos.



Elegibilidad

Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.
Condiciones
Criterios

Cualquier sexo

Sexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.

De 40 a 79 años

Rango de edades de los participantes que pueden unirse al estudio.

Voluntarios sanos no permitidos

Indica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.

Condiciones

Patología

Enfermedades Oclusivas ArterialesArteriosclerosisEnfermedades del Sistema EndocrinoEnfermedades del CorazónHiperlipidemiasEnfermedades metabólicasEnfermedades Nutricionales y MetabólicasEnfermedades VascularesEnfermedades CardiovascularesEnfermedad CoronariaDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus Tipo 2HipercolesterolemiaHipertensión

Criterios

4 criterios de inclusión requeridos para participar
Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, as determined by the new American Diabetes Association guidelines, which include a fasting plasma glucose level greater than 126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l), or a 2-hour postload value in the oral glucose tolerance test of greater than 200 mg/dl, with confirmation by a retest

For participants aged 55 years or older, a history of CVD is not required, but participant must be considered to be at high risk for experiencing a CVD event due to existing CVD, subclinical disease, or 2+ CVD risk factors

For participants aged 40 years or older, history of CVD (heart attack, stroke, history of coronary revascularization, history of peripheral or carotid revascularization, or demonstrated angina)

HbA1c 7.5%-9% (if on more drugs) or 7.5%-11% (if on fewer drugs)

Plan de Estudio

Conoce todos los tratamientos administrados en este estudio, su descripción detallada y en qué consisten.
Grupos de Tratamiento
Objetivos del Estudio

6 grupos de intervención están designados en este estudio

16.666666666666668% de probabilidad de ser asignado al grupo placebo

Grupos de Tratamiento

Grupo I

Experimental
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels <6.0%.

Grupo II

Comparador Activo
Open label administration of oral anti-hyperglycemic agents and/or insulin in combination with dietary/lifestyle advice as needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.0 - 7.9%.

Grupo III

Experimental
Open label administration of anti-hypertensive agents to reduce and maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) level to &lt;120 mmHg.

Grupo IV

Comparador Activo
Open label administration of multiple anti-hypertensive agents to maintain SBP level &lt;140 mm Hg.

Grupo 5

Experimental
Double blind administration of 160 mg/day of fenofibrate in participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in patients with eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.

Grupo 6

Placebo
Double blind administration of placebo matching either 160 mg/day in participants with eGFR ≥50 mL/min/1.73m2 or 54 mg/day in participants with eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73m2 in combination with open label simvastatin.

Objetivos del Estudio

Objetivos Primarios

Objetivos Secundarios

Centros del Estudio

Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.

Este estudio tiene 7 ubicaciones

Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation

Minneapolis, United StatesAbrir Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation en Google Maps

Columbia University

New York, United States

Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, United States

Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, United States
Completado7 Centros de Estudio