Completado

NHLBI/NICHD Collaborative Studies of Asthma in Pregnancy

0 criterios cumplidosConsulta de un vistazo cómo tu perfil cumple con cada criterio de elegibilidad.
Qué se está evaluando

theophylline

+ beclomethasone
Medicamento
Quiénes están siendo reclutados

Asthma

+ Lung Diseases
De 18 a 40 años
Cómo está diseñado el estudio

Estudio de Tratamiento

Fase 3
Intervencional
Inicio del estudio: abril de 1994

Resumen

Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 12 de julio de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio
Fecha de inicio: 1 de abril de 1994Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.

To conduct a collaborative program of research on asthma and pregnancy consisting of two studies: the Asthma in Pregnancy Study (APS) was an observational study to evaluate relationships between asthma severity and treatment programs and perinatal outcome, and the Asthma Therapy in Pregnancy Trial (ATPT) was a randomized clinical trial of inhaled beclomethasone versus theophylline in the treatment of moderate asthma during pregnancy. Both studies were conducted in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) Network, an ongoing group of participating obstetric centers supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Studies were co-funded by the NHLBI. BACKGROUND: Asthma is one of the most common illnesses that complicates pregnancy. Asthma complicates at least 4 percent of all pregnancies; however, because at least 10 percent of the population appears to have nonspecific airway hyper-responsiveness, the true prevalence may be much higher. Asthma can produce serious maternal and fetal complications. A number of investigators have reported an increased incidence of pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, hyperemesis gravidarum, vaginal hemorrhage, toxemia, and induced and complicated labor. Fetal complications include increased risk of perinatal mortality, prematurity, low birth weight, and neonatal hypoxia. In contrast, several studies have failed to confirm some or all of these previous observations. Patients with severe asthma may have the greatest risk for complications during pregnancy, in addition to the risk of maternal morbidity from the asthma. For example, it has been shown that reduced pulmonary function in asthmatic women is associated with an increased likelihood of intrauterine growth retardation. On the other hand, studies in which asthma was successfully controlled have resulted in pregnancy outcomes similar to the general population. The mechanisms by which asthma may have adverse perinatal effects are not well known. Poor control of asthma leading to chronic or episodic fetal hypoxia is thought to be important. Medications used in asthma treatment may also play a role, although the limited data suggests minimal or no effects. In addition, it is possible that extrapulmonary autonomic nervous system abnormalities, such as uterine muscle hyperreactivity, could contribute to pre-term delivery or gestational hypertension independent of asthma control or therapy. Unfortunately, previous studies have been limited by relatively small numbers. Few studies have controlled for factors known to affect infant birth weight, such as maternal race, height, weight, parity, nutrition, and cigarette smoking. Particularly, race may be an important contributing factor in assessing the relationship between asthma and pregnancy outcomes, since Blacks of both sexes are twice as likely to be hospitalized from asthma and three times as likely to die from asthma as whites. Under the auspices of the National Asthma Education Program (NAEP), a Working Group on Asthma and Pregnancy developed a statement regarding the treatment of asthma during pregnancy. In its deliberations, the Working Group noted the paucity of data on the relative contributions of biological, social, and environmental factors on asthma in pregnant women, as well as the lack of data on the efficacy and safety of commonly used asthma therapies in pregnancy. DESIGN NARRATIVE: The Asthma in Pregnancy Study evaluated the relationship between maternal asthma severity and control. The primary objective was to determine the frequency of preterm delivery <32 weeks among moderate and severe asthmatics compared to non-asthmatic controls. The incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants in women with mild and moderate asthma was a secondary outcome. Other independent variables included type of medications used, race, socioeconomic status, height, weight, parity, nutrition, smoking, other substance abuse, and prenatal care. Secondary outcomes included birth weight and prematurity, maternal pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and asthma morbidity. The study began February 1,1995 and patient recruitment continued for 46 months or less. The Asthma Therapy in Pregnancy Trial was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial which began recruitment in November, 1996, with enrollment lasting 44 months. Patients were randomized to receive either active oral theophylline and a placebo beclomethasone inhaler or an active beclomethasone inhaler and placebo oral theophylline. Albuterol was used for relief of symptoms. The primary outcome measure was incidence of Emergency Department visits or hospitalizations during pregnancy. Secondary outcome measures included birth weight, incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, lung function, daily peak flow, and quality of life. Patients were seen monthly for measurements of fetal growth, morbidity, and lung function. Extensive interviews were conducted with each patient at the first prenatal visit, in the third trimester, and shortly before birth. The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "Completed Date" entered in the Query View Report System (QVR).

Título OficialNHLBI/NICHD Collaborative Studies of Asthma in Pregnancy 
Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 12 de julio de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Protocolo

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.
Detalles del Diseño
Estudio de Tratamiento
Estos estudios prueban nuevas formas de tratar una enfermedad, condición o problema de salud. El objetivo es determinar si un nuevo medicamento, terapia o enfoque funciona mejor o tiene menos efectos secundarios que las opciones existentes.

Cómo se asignan los participantes a diferentes grupos/brazos
En este estudio clínico, los participantes se colocan en grupos de forma aleatoria, como si se lanzara una moneda. Esto garantiza que el estudio sea justo e imparcial, lo que hace que los resultados sean más confiables. Al asignar a los participantes al azar, los investigadores pueden comparar mejor los tratamientos sin influencias externas.

Otras formas de asignar participantes
Asignación no aleatoria
: Los participantes se asignan en función de factores específicos, como su condición médica o la decisión de un médico.

Ninguna (ensayo de un solo brazo)
: Si el estudio tiene un solo grupo, todos los participantes reciben el mismo tratamiento y no se necesita asignación.

Cómo se mantiene la confidencialidad de las intervenciones asignadas a los participantes
Ni los participantes ni los investigadores saben quién está recibiendo qué tratamiento. Esta es la forma más rigurosa de reducir el sesgo, asegurando que las expectativas no influyan en los resultados.

Otras formas de enmascarar la información
Abierto
: Todos saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Simple ciego
: Los participantes no saben qué tratamiento están recibiendo, pero los investigadores sí.

Triple ciego
: Participantes, investigadores y evaluadores de resultados no saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Cuádruple ciego
: Participantes, investigadores, evaluadores de resultados y personal de atención no saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Elegibilidad

Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.
Condiciones
Criterios
MujerSexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.
De 18 a 40 añosRango de edades de los participantes que pueden unirse al estudio.
Voluntarios sanos no permitidosIndica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.
Condiciones
Patología
Asthma
Lung Diseases
Criterios

Asthmatic pregnant women.



Centros del Estudio

Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.
Este estudio no tiene datos de ubicaciónNo hay información disponible sobre las ubicaciones de este estudio. 

CompletadoNingun centro de estudio