Completado

Lung Health Study (LHS) I and III

0 criterios cumplidosConsulta de un vistazo cómo tu perfil cumple con cada criterio de elegibilidad.
Qué se está evaluando

smoking cessation

+ ipratropium
Conductual
Medicamento
Quiénes están siendo reclutados

Lung Diseases

+ Lung Diseases, Obstructive
+ Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
De 35 a 60 años
Cómo está diseñado el estudio

Estudio de Prevención

Fase 3
Intervencional
Inicio del estudio: septiembre de 1984

Resumen

Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 14 de abril de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio
Fecha de inicio: 1 de septiembre de 1984Fecha en la que se inscribió al primer participante.

In the Lung Health Study I, to determine the effects of Special Care, compared to Usual Care, on rate of decline in pulmonary function in a group of cigarette smokers identified as having mild abnormalities in pulmonary function. In the Lung Health Study III, to determine the long-term effects of smoking cessation and continued smoking, on cardiopulmonary morbidity, mortality, and the rate of decline in the one second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in men and women with early chronic obstructive lung disease who have been followed prospectively for 12 to 15 years. BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States, affecting nearly 10 million persons. COPD accounts for 60,000 deaths yearly and ranks as the fourth leading cause of death. If current trends continue, it may become the nation's fourth or even third leading cause of death by the year 2000. Epidemiological studies consistently indicated that smoking was the over-whelming risk factor for accelerated decline in pulmonary function and subsequent development of COPD. Furthermore, evidence from several studies indicated that the rate of decline in pulmonary function approached a more normal rate of decline upon cessation of cigarette smoking. Another presumed risk factor for accelerated decline in pulmonary function was the presence of hyperreactive airways, although it was not clear whether the mere presence of hyperreactive airways contributed to the accelerated decline, or whether the decline resulted from the reaction of the airways to various irritants over a long period of time. It is possible that if the hyperreactive airway was kept non-reactive by pharmacological means over a period of years, the expected abnormal decline might be lessened. This effect might be enhanced by the cessation of cigarette smoking. Although the evidence was strong that smoking and hyperreactive airways were risk factors for COPD, it had not been demonstrated whether removal of risk factors at a stage when mild dysfunction had already occurred would effectively modify the course of COPD. DESIGN NARRATIVE: Lung Health Study I Randomized and controlled. Cigarette smokers with evidence of airways obstruction underwent baseline testing that included spirometric responses to isoproterenol and methacholine and were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: a no intervention or usual care group; a group receiving a smoking cessation program and bronchodilator therapy; a group receiving a smoking cessation program and a placebo bronchodilator. The placebo/bronchodilator therapy was double-blind. The smoking intervention consisted of an intensive 12-session smoking cessation program combining behavior modification and use of nicotine gum, with a continuing five-year maintenance program to minimize relapse. The bronchodilator consisted of ipratropium bromide prescribed three times daily, two puffs per time, from a metered-dose inhaler. All groups were followed yearly for five years. The primary endpoint was the rate of change of FEV1. Respiratory morbidity was a secondary endpoint. Recruitment began in November 1986 and was completed in January 1989. The clinical phase of the trial ended in April 1994. The study continues under contract N01-HR-46002 through September, 2004 for data analysis and dissemination of research results. Lung Health Study III Beginning in fiscal year 1998, all surviving participants of LHS I are invited to participate in the long-term followup. The study will determine, using an intent-to-treat analysis, whether the LHS I smoking intervention significantly reduces the incidence of clinically important respiratory and cardiovascular disease over a 12- to 15-year period following study enrollment. The study will also estimate the magnitude of the effects of FEV1 and FVC on the risks of cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality, after controlling for smoking history. Studies will be conducted on the role of other factors such as gender, airways reactivity, weight gain, and co-morbidities in determining the rate of decline in pulmonary function and the risks of cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality. A determination will also be made as to whether the improvement in lung function and reduction in respiratory symptoms associated with smoking cessation result in improved health-related quality of life (HRQL) and less depression over an extended follow-up period. The LHS III, an investigator initiated long-term follow-up study, is not an NIH- defined clinical trial.

Título OficialLung Health Study (LHS) I and III 
Patrocinador PrincipalNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Última actualización: 14 de abril de 2016
Extraido de una base de datos validada por el gobierno.Reclamar como socio

Protocolo

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan del estudio, incluyendo cómo está diseñado y qué se está evaluando.
Detalles del Diseño
Estudio de Prevención
Los estudios de prevención buscan evitar que se desarrolle una enfermedad. A menudo incluyen a personas en riesgo y evalúan vacunas, cambios en el estilo de vida o medicamentos preventivos.

Cómo se asignan los participantes a diferentes grupos/brazos
En este estudio clínico, los participantes se colocan en grupos de forma aleatoria, como si se lanzara una moneda. Esto garantiza que el estudio sea justo e imparcial, lo que hace que los resultados sean más confiables. Al asignar a los participantes al azar, los investigadores pueden comparar mejor los tratamientos sin influencias externas.

Otras formas de asignar participantes
Asignación no aleatoria
: Los participantes se asignan en función de factores específicos, como su condición médica o la decisión de un médico.

Ninguna (ensayo de un solo brazo)
: Si el estudio tiene un solo grupo, todos los participantes reciben el mismo tratamiento y no se necesita asignación.

Cómo se mantiene la confidencialidad de las intervenciones asignadas a los participantes
Ni los participantes ni los investigadores saben quién está recibiendo qué tratamiento. Esta es la forma más rigurosa de reducir el sesgo, asegurando que las expectativas no influyan en los resultados.

Otras formas de enmascarar la información
Abierto
: Todos saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Simple ciego
: Los participantes no saben qué tratamiento están recibiendo, pero los investigadores sí.

Triple ciego
: Participantes, investigadores y evaluadores de resultados no saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Cuádruple ciego
: Participantes, investigadores, evaluadores de resultados y personal de atención no saben qué tratamiento se está administrando.

Elegibilidad

Los investigadores buscan pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, conocidos como criterios de elegibilidad: estado general de salud o tratamientos previos.
Condiciones
Criterios
Cualquier sexoSexo biológico de los participantes elegibles para inscribirse.
De 35 a 60 añosRango de edades de los participantes que pueden unirse al estudio.
Voluntarios sanos no permitidosIndica si personas sanas, sin la condición que se estudia, pueden participar.
Condiciones
Patología
Lung Diseases
Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Criterios

Men and women who were cigarette smokers and between the ages of 35 and 60.



Centros del Estudio

Estos son los hospitales, clínicas o centros de investigación donde se lleva a cabo el estudio. Puedes encontrar la ubicación más cercana a ti y su estado de reclutamiento.
Este estudio no tiene datos de ubicaciónNo hay información disponible sobre las ubicaciones de este estudio. 

CompletadoNingun centro de estudio