mDEA Comparison of a Modified Deep Extubation to Standard Awake Extubation for Decreasing Operating Room Time: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This clinical trial aims to compare two different methods of removing a breathing tube from patients after surgery, known as extubation. The study focuses on patients who are considered low-risk for airway complications and are scheduled for laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia. The trial seeks to determine which method, the standard awake extubation or a modified deep extubation, is more efficient in terms of reducing time spent in the operating room while ensuring patient safety and comfort. The findings could help improve surgical recovery processes and optimize anesthesia practices for this specific group of patients. Participants in the study are randomly assigned to one of the two extubation methods. In the standard awake extubation group, patients are gradually brought out of anesthesia and extubated once they can follow simple verbal commands. In the modified deep extubation group, patients are extubated while still under light anesthesia, allowing for spontaneous breathing. Throughout the process, researchers closely monitor the patients and record various outcomes, such as the time taken for extubation and any complications. Participants provide feedback on their recovery experience once fully awake, contributing valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of both techniques. The study ensures patient safety by excluding those with certain risk factors and by having anesthesiologists available to manage any unforeseen issues during extubation.