Completed

CBEHPPHealth Impact Evaluation of the "Community-Based Environmental Health Promotion Programme" in Rwanda

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

Classic Intervention

+ Minimum Intervention

Behavioral
Who is being recruted

Vector Borne Diseases+7

+ Mosquito-Borne Diseases

+ Infections

See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Prevention Study

Interventional
Study Start: April 2013
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorGeorgetown University
Last updated: July 14, 2017
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Study start date: April 1, 2013

Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

Preventable diseases such as respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases and malaria account for a large share of mortality in low income economies. For example, diarrheal diseases kill nearly 2.5 million people worldwide and account for a considerable share of under five mortality in low income countries. Broad-based economic development that includes improvements in infrastructure and service delivery can address the challenges associated with the infectious disease burden. But for many countries, these improvements are far in the future and/or very costly. Behavior change of individuals can also address these challenges and more importantly can be done now and relatively cheaply. Understanding how to produce this behavior change in needy contexts is crucial to the short and medium term response to the high costs imposed by these diseases. This protocol outlines an evaluation of an intervention aimed at producing sustainable behavior change around health, hygiene and sanitation. The evaluation consists of two parts: firstly to evaluate the health and socio-economic effects of a well-designed and supported community health club intervention. Secondly to examine whether the intervention can deliver health and other benefits utilizing the resource base available in this context. The answer to this latter question informs the scalability of the intervention. The overall objective of the study is to evaluate whether and how community hygiene/health clubs are an effective and sustainable response to addressing broad health, sanitation and hygiene needs in low-income countries. A particular challenge associated with health interventions, is the extent to which free-rider problems mediate the adoption of improved behaviors. The community health club approach with regular meetings, is well placed to address these collective action challenges. Community health clubs provide a vehicle to inform and incentivize households to change their behavior in relation to a range of health outcomes. The information component arises from the six month long weekly courses covering a wide range of health, hygiene and sanitary subjects and facilitated by a community health worker. The incentives for sustainable behavior change follow from the social sanctions and rewards that club members can impose/bestow on members accordingly. As with other behavior change programs that have incorporated information components that emphasize the benefits of better health behavior, the evidence base for what works in this domain remains thin. The community health club approach is appealing largely because it mobilizes local resources and is plausibly cheaper and more sustainable than other top-down interventions. To evaluate the impact of the program on health, other socio-economic conditions and community functioning, a single district has been chosen where communities will be randomly assigned to receive the intervention immediately or 18 months later. The evaluation is led by US-based Innovation for Poverty Action (IPA) through researchers based at the National University of Rwanda, Georgetown University, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and New York University. The research team will work in close collaboration with the implementing team, which consists of the Ministry of Health, Rwanda and Africa AHEAD. The evaluation will measure impact heterogeneity with respect to key inputs that predict success of CHCs, including training and competence of CHWs, the quality of training materials, and community functioning. The evaluation will also document in detail the cost structure of the low- and high-resource versions of CHCs in order to inform the MOH about the most effective strategies for successful scale up of CHCs nationwide. More broadly, other governments, donor organizations and foundations will benefit from rigorous evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using health clubs to address health and sanitation challenges.

Principal SponsorGeorgetown University
Last updated: July 14, 2017
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details

8718 patients to be enrolled

Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.

Prevention Study

Prevention studies aim to stop a disease from developing. They often involve people at risk and test things like vaccines, lifestyle changes, or preventive medications.



Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria

Any sex

Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.

Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.

Healthy volunteers not allowed

If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.

Conditions

Pathology

Vector Borne DiseasesMosquito-Borne DiseasesInfectionsParasitic DiseasesProtozoan InfectionsSigns and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms, DigestivePathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDiarrheaMalaria

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: -All households with children under 5 years in the study communities are eligible for socio-economic and health outcome evaluation. Exclusion Criteria: -All households are eligible to participate in the intervention. However, for the purposes of the study, households with no children under the age of 5 will not be selected for data collection purposes.

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives

3 intervention groups are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups

Group I

Experimental
The standard "classic" approach will implement a total of 20 community health club sessions delivered through weekly education programs in the target communities as per the training manual. Community health workers (CHW) will receive careful training in the delivery of the CBEHPP instruction. High quality instructional materials (in color) will be used. Club members will each receive a membership card to be used to track attendance and compliance. Finally model home competitions and a graduation ceremony will be held. Monitoring of the clubs will be conducted by community health workers using mobile phones.

Group II

Experimental
The "lite" trial arm will only implement 8 sessions covering all the WASH topics. It will be facilitated by CHWs receiving minimal training and using black/white photocopies of instructional materials. Members will not be issued with membership cards and will not have a graduation ceremony or home garden competitions. Minimal monitoring of this arm will be carried out by environmental health officers.

Group III

No Intervention
The control group is not enrolled in the CBEHPP. Because of the government's commitment for the national roll out to the CBEHPP, the control population will receive the intervention as soon as possible following the conclusion of the trial phase. Nevertheless, we will continue to evaluate the sustained impact of the intervention for two additional years by monitoring various behavioural outcomes and indicators and their impact on exposure outcomes (drinking water, hand hygiene, consumption, schooling and labour market participation etc.). We will use data from the RCT phase and clinical records to estimate the effect of any sustained impact on health. Long term impacts can be inferred by using data from the trial as well as data on long term behavioural outcomes.

Study Objectives

Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.

This study has 2 locations

IPA Rwanda District Office

Kamembe, RwandaOpen IPA Rwanda District Office in Google Maps

Innovations for Poverty Action

Kigali, Rwanda
Completed2 Study Centers