A Randonimised Trial Comparing Interrupted to Continuous Suturing Techniques in Radiocephalic Fistulae
Interrupted
+ Continuous
Urogenital Diseases+9
+ Chronic Disease
+ Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Treatment Study
Summary
Study start date: May 1, 2012
Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.The micro-vascular anastamosis required for creation of a radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula, is technically challenging surgery. Primary patency rates for radiocephalic fistula varying between 50-75% in the literature and 60-95% within over own department. It is important to optimise primary patency rates as initial failure subjects the patient to risks of further surgery and often necessiates them commencing dialysis via a tunnelled line (which is less effective and associated with increased risks of infection) whilst a second attempt at creating a fistula is undertaken. Multiple variations of both continuous and interrupted suture technique are described in the vascular literature, both in animal models of arterio-venous fistulae and in clinical studies in other specialities. However no study has compared the two techniques within clinical practice. Evidence from in vivo animal studies is variable. Several authors have shown no difference in primary patency rates achieved with continuous suture versus interrupted suture technique used for anastomosis(Chen & Chen, 2001; Wilasrusmee et al 2007). Others have suggested that using a continuous suture causes a reduced cross-sectional area of the anastomosis compared to an interrupted technique (Tozzi & Hayoz, 2001). Similarly an interrupted suture technique permits expansion of the vessel at physiological pressures where as continuous technique does not (Norbert & Philip, 1996; Gerdisch & Hinkamp, 2003). This loss of compliance at the anastomosis can in turn lead to intimal hyperplasia, causing poor blood flow and failure of the anastamosis (Dorbin, 1994), indicating potential theoretical benefits of interrupted suturing. There are no clinical studies comparing the two techniques and variation in practice varies considerably. The aim of this study therefore is the compare patency rates in radiocephalic fistulae by randomising to one or other anastomotic technique.
Protocol
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.70 patients to be enrolled
Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.Treatment Study
Eligibility
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.Any sex
Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.Over 18 Years
Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.Healthy volunteers not allowed
If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.Conditions
Pathology
Criteria
Study Plan
Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.2 intervention groups are designated in this study
This study does not include a placebo group
Treatment Groups
Group I
ExperimentalGroup II
Active ComparatorStudy Objectives
Primary Objectives
Secondary Objectives
Study Centers
These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.This study has 1 location
Department of Renal Surgery, Western Infirmary
Glasgow, United KingdomOpen Department of Renal Surgery, Western Infirmary in Google Maps