Suspended

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial, Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Resection For Rectal Adenocarcinoma

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

extralevator APR

+ APR

Procedure
Who is being recruted

Digestive System Diseases+8

+ Digestive System Neoplasms

+ Gastrointestinal Diseases

Over 18 Years
See all eligibility criteria
How is the trial designed

Treatment Study

Interventional
Study Start: July 2011
See protocol details

Summary

Principal SponsorStony Brook University
Study ContactRoberto Bergamaschi, MD, PhDMore contacts
Last updated: April 25, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Study start date: July 1, 2011

Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

This is a study that compares two types of surgery for rectal cancer. There are two procedures that can be used during this surgery, conventional abdominal resection (APR) and extended (or extralevator) APR. The investigators are doing this research to see whether the extralevator APR increases the likelihood that the edge of the tissue that is removed will be more likely to be free from cancer cells compared with the conventional APR surgery. At this time there is no evidence that one type of procedure is better at this than the other. The objective of this research is to determine whether extralevator APR is more likely to have clean margins (free of cancer) compared to the standard APR surgery.

Principal SponsorStony Brook University
Study ContactRoberto Bergamaschi, MD, PhDMore contacts
Last updated: April 25, 2013
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details

34 patients to be enrolled

Total number of participants that the clinical trial aims to recruit.

Treatment Study

These studies test new ways to treat a disease, condition, or health issue. The goal is to see if a new drug, therapy, or approach works better or has fewer side effects than existing options.



Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria

Any sex

Biological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.

Over 18 Years

Range of ages for which participants are eligible to join.

Healthy volunteers not allowed

If individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.

Conditions

Pathology

Digestive System DiseasesDigestive System NeoplasmsGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsIntestinal DiseasesIntestinal NeoplasmsNeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteRectal DiseasesColorectal NeoplasmsRectal Neoplasms

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Resectable, histologically proven primary adenocarcinoma of the low rectum with internal and/or external sphincter muscle involvement. Staged as follows prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Stage T3 or T4 at MRI N0-2 at MRI M0 at CT scan Patient must undergo long term neoadjuvant chemoradiation: 20 fractions of radiation over ≥5 weeks: total of 50-60 Gy, and chemotherapeutic agents Exclusion Criteria: Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma Stage T1-2, any N T4 with one of the following: with pelvic side wall involvement requiring sacrectomy requiring prostatectomy (partial or total) Distant metastasis (M1) Unresectable primary rectal cancer or Inability to complete R0 resection. Recurrent rectal cancer Previous pelvic malignancy Inability to sign informed consent Pregnancy

Study Plan

Find out more about all the medication administered in this study, their detailed description and what they involve.
Treatment Groups
Study Objectives

2 intervention groups are designated in this study

This study does not include a placebo group 

Treatment Groups

Group I

Experimental
This is a modified and more extensive procedure that is used to remove the levator muscle en bloc with the anal canal and the mesorectum, creating a more "cylindrical" specimen, so that the amount of tissue removed around the tumor will be larger, thereby reducing the probability that the CRM will be positive.

Group II

Active Comparator
conventional abdominoperineal resection (APR)

Study Objectives

Primary Objectives

Secondary Objectives

Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.

This study has 4 locations

Recruiting

State University Hospital Medical Center

Stony Brook, United StatesOpen State University Hospital Medical Center in Google Maps
Recruiting

Stony Broook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, United States
Recruiting

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, United States
Recruiting

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, United States
Suspended4 Study Centers