Completed

Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (PREVENT)

0 criteria met from your profileSee at a glance how your profile meets each eligibility criteria.
What is being tested

warfarin

Drug
Who is being recruted

Cardiovascular Diseases
+3

+ Heart Diseases
+ Peripheral Vascular Diseases
From 30 to 75 Years
How is the trial designed

Prevention Study

Phase 3
Interventional
Study Start: September 1998

Summary

Principal SponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Last updated: March 16, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner
Study start date: September 1, 1998Actual date on which the first participant was enrolled.

A multicenter randomized, double blind placebo controlled trial to determine the efficacy of long-term, low dose warfarin in the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is associated with more than 300,000 hospitalizations and results in thousands of deaths annually. Conventional therapy consists of intravenous heparin followed by oral anticoagulants usually given for three to six months. The recommended intensity of oral anticoagulants (warfarin) has been derived from clinical trials. Such therapy is usually quite effective. However, some patients develop recurrent disease after the oral anticoagulants are stopped. A recent randomized study evaluated the optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy. After acute treatment with heparin, subjects were treated with oral anticoagulants for either six weeks or six months with a target INR \* of 2 to 2.85. There was no difference in mortality in the two groups. Recurrence was not seen while the patients were under treatment. When anticoagulants were stopped, recurrent thrombosis was documented in 18 percent of the patients treated for six weeks and in 9.5 percent of those treated for six months. The period of greatest risk of recurrence for the six weeks patients was immediately after therapy was stopped. There was a linear increase in cumulative risk of 5 to 6 percent per year for both treatment groups during the following 18 months. For patients who have experienced idiopathic venous thrombosis, the risk of recurrence may continue even after several months of conventional therapy. Further prophylactic therapy might be beneficial for the patients who are at risk for late recurrence. But, because of the presumed risk of bleeding and inconvenience of monitoring standard warfarin therapy, most physicians usually limit treatment to three to six months. In 1997, Simioni showed a cumulative recurrence rate of VTE of 39.7 percent among those with factor V Leiden mutation, with all recurrences occurring within three years, a rate 2.4 times higher than among individuals without the mutation. The factor V Leiden mutation is found in 4 to 6 percent of Caucasians and is the single most important cause of thromboembolism in a variety of conditions. Heterozygous carriers with the mutation have VTE at a younger age than do noncarriers. Among those with first VTE, the prevalence of the mutation is 15 to 40 percent and among those with a family history of VTE, as high as 50 percent. However, in a large study of men participating in the Physicians Health Study, those individuals with the mutation had an increased rate of VTE over time. These age-specific incidence rate differences ranged from 1.23 to 5.97 in those aged 70 or older. These data suggest that confounders other than genetic predisposition are important in the development of VTE. \* The INR or international normalized ratio is the ratio of patient prothrombin to control prothrombin multiplied by the international sensitivity index. The INR was introduced by the World Health Organization to standardize control of anticoagulant therapy internationally. DESIGN NARRATIVE: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled. A total of 253 patients were randomized to usual care plus placebo and a total of 255 patients to usual care plus a three-to-four year regimen of low-dose warfarin (target INR 1.5 to 2.0), which after initial titration required infrequent outpatient monitoring. Double-blind INR assessment and dose adjustment were performed every three months to ensure patient safety and to monitor compliance. Primary endpoints included recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding episodes, and all-cause mortality. Separate analysis was performed of all-cause mortality in the total patient population and in those with factor V Leiden. The study consisted of 52 clinical centers, a laboratory coordinating center, the clinical coordinating center, and the data coordinating center. The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

Official TitlePrevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism (PREVENT) 
Principal SponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Last updated: March 16, 2016
Sourced from a government-validated database.Claim as a partner

Protocol

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
Design Details
Prevention Study
Prevention studies aim to stop a disease from developing. They often involve people at risk and test things like vaccines, lifestyle changes, or preventive medications.

How participants are assigned to different groups/arms
In this clinical study, participants are placed into groups randomly, like flipping a coin. This ensures that the study is fair and unbiased, making the results more reliable. By assigning participants by chance, researchers can better compare treatments without external influences.

Other Ways to Assign Participants
Non-randomized allocation
: Participants are assigned based on specific factors, such as their medical condition or a doctor's decision.

None (Single-arm trial)
: If the study has only one group, all participants receive the same treatment, and no allocation is needed.

How the interventions assigned to participants is kept confidential
Neither participants nor researchers know who is receiving which treatment. This is the most rigorous way to reduce bias, ensuring that expectations do not influence the results.

Other Ways to Mask Information
Open-label
: Everyone knows which treatment is being given.

Single-blind
: Participants do not know which treatment they are receiving, but researchers do.

Triple-blind
: Participants, researchers, and outcome assessors do not know which treatment is given.

Quadruple-blind
: Participants, researchers, outcome assessors, and care providers all do not know which treatment is given.

Eligibility

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria: person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Conditions
Criteria
Any sexBiological sex of participants that are eligible to enroll.
From 30 to 75 YearsRange of ages for which participants are eligible to join.
Healthy volunteers not allowedIf individuals who are healthy and do not have the condition being studied can participate.
Conditions
Pathology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Heart Diseases
Peripheral Vascular Diseases
Thromboembolism
Vascular Diseases
Venous Thromboembolism
Criteria

Patients with venous thromboembolism, including patients with factor V Leiden. Patients had completed prescribed anticoagulation therapy within the last two years before the trial and were not currently on anticoagulation therapy.



Study Centers

These are the hospitals, clinics, or research facilities where the trial is being conducted. You can find the location closest to you and its status.
This study has no location dataSave this study to your profile to know when the location data is available. 

CompletedNo study centers