Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Intraoperative Nerve Infiltration During Anterior Hip Replacement Surgery
Pre-operative Ultrasound FICB Group
+ Intra-operative FICB Group
Manifestations Neurologiques+4
+ Douleur
+ Processus pathologiques
Étude thérapeutique
Résumé
Date de début de l'étude : 1 août 2012
Date à laquelle le premier participant a commencé l'étude.Though still uncommonly used in the United States, the popularity of the anterior approach for total hip replacement is rapidly growing because of its clinical advantages. Rehabilitation is simplified and accelerated, dislocation risk is reduced, leg length is more accurately controlled, and incision is smaller than with traditional approaches (GOEBEL). Nevertheless, although pain is lessened, it is still considerable, and new techniques have been developed to improve postoperative pain control for this procedure. Surgical incision and tissue trauma result in postoperative pain. Regional pain blocks, especially when done under ultrasound guidance, have proven to be extremely effective at reducing postoperative pain and improving patient satisfaction. One such block, the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), has been shown to be effective in controlling pain associated with surgery involving the hip and femur. Although possible without ultrasound guidance, using this technique allows for identification of specific tissue planes and precise placement of medication near the nerves responsible for postoperative pain. Using ultrasound, the superficial fascial layer of the iliopsoas muscle is identified at the anterior edge of the ilium, and a needle is placed just beneath that fascia. A high volume of local anesthetic is then injected under ultrasound guidance, ensuring cephalad spread of medication, in an attempt to provide anesthesia of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves. Unlike other approaches to hip replacement, anterior repair allows for direct visualization of the fascial layers described above. This allows for direct injection of local anesthetic beneath this fascia, potentially obviating the need for preoperatively performed, ultrasound guided, FICB. The primary differences in approach (ultrasound guided preop versus direct visualization intraop) is the timing of injection, and it is unclear if nerve block prior to or after tissue damage affects postoperative pain in these patients. Surgical trauma causes nerve sensitization leading to amplification and prolongation of postoperative pain. In experimental studies, pre-injury neural blockade using local anesthetics has been shown to reduce post-injury sensitization of the central nervous system, while similar techniques applied after the injury had less or no effect (FILOS). Investigators have therefore designed this study to examine the timing of FICB (pre-operatively versus intra-operatively) on postoperative pain in patients undergoing anterior hip replacement surgery.
Protocole
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan de l'étude, y compris la manière dont l'étude est conçue et ce qu'elle évalue.50 participants à inclure
Nombre total de participants que l'essai clinique vise à recruter.Traitement
Éligibilité
Les chercheurs recherchent des patients correspondant à une certaine description appelée critères d'éligibilité : état de santé général ou traitements antérieurs du patient.Tout sexe
Le sexe biologique des participants éligibles à s'inscrire.De 18 à 65 ans
Tranche d'âge des participants éligibles à participer.Volontaires sains non autorisés
Indique si les individus en bonne santé et ne présentant pas la condition étudiée peuvent participer.Conditions
Pathologie
Critères
Plan de l'étude
Découvrez tous les traitements administrés dans cette étude, leur description détaillée et ce qu'ils impliquent.2 groupes d'intervention sont désignés dans cette étude
Cette étude ne comporte pas de groupe placebo.
Groupes de traitement
Groupe I
ExpérimentalGroupe II
Comparateur actifObjectifs de l'étude
Objectifs principaux
Objectifs secondaires
Centres d'étude
Ce sont les hôpitaux, cliniques ou centres de recherche où l'essai est conduit. Vous pouvez trouver le site le plus proche de vous ainsi que son statut.Cette étude comporte 1 site